Tweet
Predict the Packers Win/Loss Record.
Poll to follow.
Poll to follow.
-
2817-00%116-10%015-20%214-30%113-40%1112-50%811-60%310-70%29-80%08-90%07-100%06-110%05-120%04-130%03-140%02-150%01-160%00-170%00-0-170%0Other0%0The poll is expired.
I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen -
13-4. Matt always wins 13 games.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen -
Boo! Nothing about Coldplay.Comment
-
I debate between 11-13 wins so I'm just choosing the middle one.TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWERComment
-
I'll say 15-2, but as always, I honestly don't see any likely losses. We'll probably slip up a couple of times and lose games we shouldn't.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?Comment
-
I usually would have gone 18 - 0 (winning in the off week also).
This season I have a bit of a queasy feeling.
Good enough to win the north.
After that things, much like my alleged mind, get foggy.Comment
-
Ah fuck ..
10 - 7
(I was told math wouldn’t be required)Comment
-
13-4
Losses to KC, Bucs, Bills, Vikes.
All away games.Comment
-
Packers don't play KC in regular season.Originally posted by George Cumby View PostI can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard CohenComment
-
13-4 seems likely
Losses: at Minnesota, at Buffalo, at Detroit, Rams.Comment
-
Minnesota? Sheeeeeesh. I could see maybe losing to Buffalo at their place, but even that would take a letdown. Is that Lions game the end of season game that might be meaningless? Yeah, if so, that could be a loss.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?Comment
-
-
By “KC,” Cumby meant that he is expecting the Packers to lay an egg against the New York Football Giants in London, birthplace of the greatest band of all time, Coldplay.
In my place, in my place were lines that I couldn’t change…
Comment
-
Agreed.Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
If the Pack D is as good as advertised, week 1 against the Queens should be a walk in the park for our beloved Pack. On paper, the Packers are superior matchup-wise. Theoretically, J-Alex should be more than capable of shutting down Jefferson. Ditto, Douglas/Stokes vs Theilen. Campbell, Q-Walk and Harrell’s favorite Yokozuna, Cletidus Clark, should form an impregnable wall against Cook. Doubs should have little problems catching daylight against the Queen’s milksop corners, assuming the over-the-hill Peterson lines up against the worst numero uno rock catcher in the league, Lazard. Jones and Dillon should be licking their chops at the opportunities to run at “Z.” Butte should be Butte.
Packers 72
Queens 0
I just wrote the official week 1 gameday thread. Sorry, y’all won’t get further reads on my miserable existence flipping burgers.
Comment
-
Yeah, that's my kind of analysis.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?Comment
Comment