Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers Releasing Sammy Watkins

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Packers Releasing Sammy Watkins

    I guess with all their WR's healthy, no need for him. A guy whose body just gave out on him.
    I can't run no more
    With that lawless crowd
    While the killers in high places
    Say their prayers out loud
    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
    A thundercloud
    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

  • #2
    Well he wasn't going to be back, and he wasn't going to get a lot of snaps (if they are smart and get the rookies the snaps) so it's a nice gesture to let him try to possibly latch on with a contender... at worst he gets out of the cold a little early.

    Not a horrible career for the guy (roughly 360 catches 5600 yds, etc.) but he's past his expiration date. Wish him the best going forward.

    Comment


    • #3
      Run pretty much nailed it. Wish him well. I kind of thought this was a foolish signing from the start and I'm surprised he made it through camp. Never the less, the youths got their shot and are the future so let's greet it.

      Comment


      • #4
        He had good per-catch numbers, but never had more than 3 catches per game. Is this to make room, to save money, or to give him a chance for a few checks somewhere else?

        I was afraid between extrauniversal consciousness or his family's legal problems that he would be a distraction, but I guess he served his purpose, and we're moving on.
        I believe in God, family, Baylor University, and the Green Bay Packers.

        Comment


        • #5
          I had high hopes. He probably did too. None of that happened. Surprised by the timing.
          "Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher

          Comment


          • #6
            Brought Taylor up from PS / because Jones is banged up??
            The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
            Vince Lombardi

            "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

            Comment


            • #7
              he's ben done for awhile now

              the idea that he would be the vet WR that this team needed shows how delusional our GM is

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by red View Post
                he's ben done for awhile now

                the idea that he would be the vet WR that this team needed shows how delusional our fans are
                There you go.
                "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                KYPack

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by red View Post
                  he's ben done for awhile now

                  the idea that he would be the vet WR that this team needed shows how delusional our GM is
                  And our fan base who argued with me that KC WR were better than ours a couple years back because they had Sammy Watkiins......
                  The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It's not just his body that was giving out. His poor route running was a big factor in the loss to Detroit. He did make a good block of two defenders on a Watson end around against the Bears.
                    2025 Ratpickers champion.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Wonder how he does w/ Ravens
                      The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
                      Vince Lombardi

                      "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I think they were hoping he'd be able to get on the same page with Rodgers quickly and that didn't seem to happen. Agree it was obvious there were some bad routes or miscommunications.
                        Well he got picked up by BAL because Duvernay and Bateman and everyone else in that WR room is hurt or on IR. They have no depth left and he'll get a shot to play.

                        Good for him, and good luck to him. Sounded like MLF was not thrilled to lose him for Patrick Taylor, but I think it's a good move for GB. They probably need Taylor more than they do Watkins with Jones and Dillon taking lumps recently.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by run pMc View Post
                          I think they were hoping he'd be able to get on the same page with Rodgers quickly and that didn't seem to happen. Agree it was obvious there were some bad routes or miscommunications.
                          Well he got picked up by BAL because Duvernay and Bateman and everyone else in that WR room is hurt or on IR. They have no depth left and he'll get a shot to play.

                          Good for him, and good luck to him. Sounded like MLF was not thrilled to lose him for Patrick Taylor, but I think it's a good move for GB. They probably need Taylor more than they do Watkins with Jones and Dillon taking lumps recently.
                          He didn’t have a chance to get on the same page with Rodgers

                          Pft posted a couple articles in the last couple of days showing just how fucked up things have gotten under Rodgers

                          Position groups not watching practice film together because as leafleting said “ certain vets took us away from that”

                          And then the other article talking about the hand signals and Jordan live saying that Rodgers will just pull out random signals during games that he hasn’t used in 5 or 6 seasons that non of the young guys or new guys have ever seen. And as live puts it. If they don’t know those old signals, they just have to figure it out.

                          This lines up very well with Rodgers throwing the ball everywhere but where the receiver is, then bitching out the WR for not running the route he wanted

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Didn’t Rodgers say that Atlantic article was horseshit?

                            And lafleur clarified his statement and said the qv/wr’s meet multiple times a week to install offense and signals.

                            Red - your criticism of a 1st ballot hof doesn’t hold water.
                            The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
                            Vince Lombardi

                            "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Personally, I don't go to Florio and his folks for Packer analysis. But maybe that's just me.

                              MLF talked about it yesterday. https://madison.com/sports/football/...r_MadisonSport
                              I can't run no more
                              With that lawless crowd
                              While the killers in high places
                              Say their prayers out loud
                              But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                              A thundercloud
                              They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X