Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who Will Aaron Rodgers Play For In 2023 (Or Will He Play)?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Joemailman
    Vegas now favoring Raiders. So who will Rodgers play for?

    Poll to follow.
    Himself.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #17
      I’ve had friends do retreats where no one speaks. To each is own.

      Most here probably couldn’t stand the boredom or face their thoughts for that long.
      The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
      Vince Lombardi

      "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

      Comment


      • #18
        Four days of ayahuasca.

        Comment


        • #19
          Rodgers is not turning down all the money; he's coming back. He'll be back to GB and have a improved year, we'll make the playoffs, and then he'll shit on himself in the second half of another playoff loss....kinda like San Fran and Tampa
          TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
            Rodgers is not turning down all the money; he's coming back. He'll be back to GB and have a improved year, we'll make the playoffs, and then he'll shit on himself in the second half of another playoff loss....kinda like San Fran and Tampa
            This is the most likely scenario IMO...and then we repeat this drama same time next year.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by run pMc View Post
              This is the most likely scenario IMO...and then we repeat this drama same time next year.
              So trade him before it all starts again.

              Please.

              Looking like, IF he is traded - and I don't think he will be - the Raiders are the most likely destination.

              But I think he'll come back and play for GB next year. And what Bretsky outlined is probably the best-(realistic) case scenario.
              "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

              KYPack

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by George Cumby View Post
                I voted 'Jets' because the cosmic symmetry is just too perfect.
                Jets for a year then on to the Vikes. Has to happen.
                C.H.U.D.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                  If LaFleur or Gutekunst or Murphy - anybody with inside knowledge on the Packers ever read the crap in this forum, they'd be laughing their asses off.
                  You realize you post on this forum. And probably would be the main source of said laughter right? You get that right?
                  The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                  Comment


                  • #24


                    LOL!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Bobblehead, I'm completely confident that I'm aligned with the thinking of the Packer brass on this topic - unlike the various haters and dumbasses. They are the ones who did that glorious Rodgers contract - which many in here stupidly hate, and IMO, they did it with eyes wide open and are still glad they did - as am I, (OBVIOUSLY).
                      What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                        Bobblehead, I'm completely confident that I'm aligned with the thinking of the Packer brass on this topic - unlike the various haters and dumbasses. They are the ones who did that glorious Rodgers contract - which many in here stupidly hate, and IMO, they did it with eyes wide open and are still glad they did - as am I, (OBVIOUSLY).
                        Rodgers contract promotes a trade.
                        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
                          Rodgers contract promotes a trade.
                          I wouldn't say that. But I think the contract makes clear that if you're going to trade Rodgers, it is basically now or never.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
                            I wouldn't say that. But I think the contract makes clear that if you're going to trade Rodgers, it is basically now or never.
                            Yeah, that too.
                            Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I think it's the Jets or Colts

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
                                I wouldn't say that. But I think the contract makes clear that if you're going to trade Rodgers, it is basically now or never.
                                Isn't the fact that if they don't trade now, they will not have options in the future part of why the contract promotes a trade?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X