The Packers need an actual safety. I doubt Branch was the highest safety on their board.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Day 2 (Rounds 2&3) Of NFL Draft Thread
Collapse
X
-
AgreedOriginally posted by MadScientist View PostWe can get one of the Illinois safeties and be fine. Need a WR with our next pick.The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.
Comment
-
I wonder if the Packers are going back to back TEs. It would make sense to move down there because Washington, Kraft, and Schoonmaker are still on the board. Kraft is my favorite of the three, but Washington might be a better fit with Musgrave."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
-
I evaluated them myself. I had Musgrave as TE3–mainly because of the injury. He likely would have been TE2 otherwise. Greg Olsen was my comp.Originally posted by red View Postwell, lets hope your guys better at evaluating talent then some of the other guys out there"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment


Comment