More Banjo - Packers vs Lions - Part 1

[SudsMcBucky]

Hats off to Detroit, they completely outplayed the Pack in every phase, I am hoping that they are for real and this isn't the norm for the Packers going forward. 2 games in a row of this shit so I don't know if this team is really just trash, i had really high hopes and they are quickly coming apart

I don't think you need to wonder if DET is for real. As you know, they beat KC on the road, too.

[bobblehead]

https://lombardiave.com/posts/packers-matt-lafleur-throws-joe-barry-bus-week-4-lions-01hbfgp8x1vd?utm_source=RSS

Maybe there is hope.

edit: better link

[call_me_ishmael]

Btw, that was a great catch by Reed. He had beat his man and the ball was a little under thrown. So he slowed down to use his body as a shield to keep the DB from being able to knock down the ball.

I wasn’t sure of the Reed pick when it happened. But I think he is going to have a really good career. Maybe James Jones type numbers. 60 catches, 800 yards, 5-10 TDs a year.

Dude I totally agree. He looks really good to me. I can't remember a rookie wideout impressing me so much.

[Guiness]

I was at the game and was wondering why the Lions didn’t challenge the long completion to Reed at the end of the 3rd quarter.

It clearly looked to be after the clock was at zero live at the game. I know the NBA looks at all of those plays. Did the broadcast say anything about it?

It was brought up a couple of times and they mentioned that the game clock is different than the play clock - it's not a matter of judgment on the part of the referee (the 'long zero' seen all the time), the play should be dead.

They also pointed out it could not be challenged and not re-viewable.

If the Pack had completed their comeback, the Lions fans would've quite rightfully lost their minds!

[jklowan]

I don't think you need to wonder if DET is for real. As you know, they beat KC on the road, too.

KC had no receivers in that game so I am just not sure about how good the Lions actually are. The Packers gacked up a 12 point lead to the Falcons with 12 minutes left in the game, posted a big lead to the Saints and got lucky with the missed field goal & now this beatdown by Lions, it is starting to feel like this Packer team is not very good, just my opinion. Jordan Love looks promising and the past 2 drafts look decent so there is hope for the future, I guess I thought this might be a surprise year, not any more. My hope now is a DC fire and finally a decent defense hire, might not take long if we suffer threw a few more of games like this.

[Fritz]

https://lombardiave.com/posts/packer...utm_source=RSS

Maybe there is hope.

edit: better link

I just watched about six minutes of The Flower's presser after the game. One of the reporters - Pete Dogherty - was trying to ask a question, and I couldn't quite catch it. I THINK it was something like "what the hell happened that you started so badly?" - not in those words, but that question. The Flower just ripped his head off, said it was a BS question, if he knew the answer it wouldn't have happened. I know he just saw his team get beat up, but I thought he was unneccesarily pissy about it. Don't we all want to ask The Flower why the hell his team wasn't ready to play again for the second week in a row?? Maybe the answer is "I don't know." But it's not a BS question.

I also saw The Flower, when asked about the run defense, put his head down for a moment, as if trying to gather his thoughts, or bite his tongue. His comment about it being insane to do the same thing over and over again, and following that with the comment about at least take one phase away - wow, he really was pissed. He tried to redirect it back a bit onto himself, but it's clear he's really angry at Joe Barely. I expect to see a lot more base defense against the Raiders, and probably Jaire on Davante.

I've never seen LeFleur that pissed off. Though he did say he was proud that they at least competed in the second half and didn't fold.

Me, I'd like to know who kidnapped Rich Bisaccia and replaced him with Maurice Drayton in a Rich Bisaccia costume. The team has devoted significant resources to ST, and they looked like their old selves last night. And it wasn't the rookie punter and kicker that were the problem. It was the penalties.

[run pMc]

MLF was pretty pissed after the ATL game at the run defense as well. I think he's feeling some heat about that and rightfully so.

This is going to sound like both an excuse and a broken record, but young players are going to make great athletic plays and also stupid boneheaded ones. I think that's a contributing factor to their uneven performance.
There is a certain amount of this that is on the coaches - in terms of the game plan, the development of young players, the teaching of scheme and making sure they are following the rules of the scheme and playing with good fundamentals.
Beyond that, the players have to execute and if they are being sloppy, playing hero-ball/guessing, or just not playing with proper technique they will look bad.

I think Joe Barry should take some blame for this -- they often played with 2 DL when DET was running and didn't adapt. They played better in the second half and forced some punts, but by then they spotted Detroit 27 points.
More often I thought the player execution was not good enough. Quay was both good and bad (mostly good, but he's still not showing the instincts and reaction speed I'd like to see). McDuffie is a backup and replacement level guy pushed into action. GB's DL lost more than it won at the LOS, and the team that is winning there and resetting the LOS should be able to do what the Lions did, namely, run 40+ times for over 200 yards. Colby Wooden might be a nice player in Year 3, but right now he's probably 275 and can't hold up against 2 DET OL running Duo at him. Davonte Wyatt is still not great at run defense. Slaton and Clark are their best guys but you can't play them 80% of the snaps. Savage is tackling better but he and Rasul gambled a few times and guessed wrong. They didn't have Jaire and even Valentine is banged up. I could go on and on, but I saw a DL that struggled to get off blocks and ILBs that struggled to read the hole and fill it by meeting the RB there at full speed.

Offensively they didn't have a smart plan but they struggled to run the ball anyway. Short/quick passing game might have helped, or more screen or plays to work the defense laterally. Love was holding the ball and on a few sacks had players open and didn't see them, so maybe it was a bad game for him or maybe he got flustered by the rush ... or disguised coverage. Either way, I didn't think the offense looked competent in the first half, and I wonder if that's on MLF or on Stenovich.

I don't see a scenario where they bring Barry next year. Maybe Brandon Staley gets cut loose from LAC and decides he wants to coach this defense instead of sitting around and getting paid...but it won't happen until end of year when Barry is gone.

This won't be the last stinker we see this year...it's a young team playing .500 ball, which is about what I expected.

[MadScientist]

I just watched about six minutes of The Flower's presser after the game. One of the reporters - Pete Dogherty - was trying to ask a question, and I couldn't quite catch it. I THINK it was something like "what the hell happened that you started so badly?" - not in those words, but that question. The Flower just ripped his head off, said it was a BS question, if he knew the answer it wouldn't have happened. I know he just saw his team get beat up, but I thought he was unnecessarily pissy about it. Don't we all want to ask The Flower why the hell his team wasn't ready to play again for the second week in a row?? Maybe the answer is "I don't know." But it's not a BS question.

The Packers have not been good in any first half this season. MLF should be pissed, not at the question, but at the team and the preparation. They pick up after the half, but they can't come out this pathetic. They have to start better and more prepared. They looked lost on defense and were not dictating anything on offense.

[Sparkey]

MLF says ..."It is insane to try the same things over and expect different results."

MLF retains JB as his DC.

Irony, eh!?

[ThunderDan]

We played a lot of nickel with 2 big DL in the game. On a couple of the TD runs, I knew Det was going to run up the middle. 3 on 2 for an easy score.

[Fritz]

MLF was pretty pissed after the ATL game at the run defense as well. I think he's feeling some heat about that and rightfully so.

This is going to sound like both an excuse and a broken record, but young players are going to make great athletic plays and also stupid boneheaded ones. I think that's a contributing factor to their uneven performance.
There is a certain amount of this that is on the coaches - in terms of the game plan, the development of young players, the teaching of scheme and making sure they are following the rules of the scheme and playing with good fundamentals.
Beyond that, the players have to execute and if they are being sloppy, playing hero-ball/guessing, or just not playing with proper technique they will look bad.

I think Joe Barry should take some blame for this -- they often played with 2 DL when DET was running and didn't adapt. They played better in the second half and forced some punts, but by then they spotted Detroit 27 points.
More often I thought the player execution was not good enough. Quay was both good and bad (mostly good, but he's still not showing the instincts and reaction speed I'd like to see). McDuffie is a backup and replacement level guy pushed into action. GB's DL lost more than it won at the LOS, and the team that is winning there and resetting the LOS should be able to do what the Lions did, namely, run 40+ times for over 200 yards. Colby Wooden might be a nice player in Year 3, but right now he's probably 275 and can't hold up against 2 DET OL running Duo at him. Davonte Wyatt is still not great at run defense. Slaton and Clark are their best guys but you can't play them 80% of the snaps. Savage is tackling better but he and Rasul gambled a few times and guessed wrong. They didn't have Jaire and even Valentine is banged up. I could go on and on, but I saw a DL that struggled to get off blocks and ILBs that struggled to read the hole and fill it by meeting the RB there at full speed.

Offensively they didn't have a smart plan but they struggled to run the ball anyway. Short/quick passing game might have helped, or more screen or plays to work the defense laterally. Love was holding the ball and on a few sacks had players open and didn't see them, so maybe it was a bad game for him or maybe he got flustered by the rush ... or disguised coverage. Either way, I didn't think the offense looked competent in the first half, and I wonder if that's on MLF or on Stenovich.

I don't see a scenario where they bring Barry next year. Maybe Brandon Staley gets cut loose from LAC and decides he wants to coach this defense instead of sitting around and getting paid...but it won't happen until end of year when Barry is gone.

This won't be the last stinker we see this year...it's a young team playing .500 ball, which is about what I expected.

I've been wondering if instead of this all being on Joe Barely or on MLF for hiring him, it's also a function of Guter not drafting super great on defense. He's got Rashan Gary and Jaire Alexander to his credit; Quay Walker looks like he will be very good, and he found (or his scouts found and he signed) Rasul Douglas, and he got one really good year out of Campbell (but only one). But Devonte Wyatt's big "second year leap" has turned into a tiny little step sideways. TJ SLaton is serviceable but no stud, Savage is a disappointment for the #21 overall pick, Adrian Amos was good for a couple years but there's no replacement. I mean, it's not a horrible track record, but maybe they're not as good as I thought?

Ah, I tried. But hell, mostly Guter seems to have done well enough. Plus there's Kenny Clark from the Thompson years. Joe Barely just sucks ass, that's all. You can talk about injuries to Alexander and Campbell, but every team has those. And it's only two.

As I have said, I've got more patience for the offense, which has a new starting QB and lots of young receivers and tight ends, plus the entire left side of the line missing. But the defense - I have no patience for them sucking. They're not as young as the offense, experience-wise. The two preferred starting corners are experienced. One safety is. (The other's a retread.) The top two preferred defensive linemen are experienced. The linebackers are experienced. So in answer to Jimi Hendrix's question, yes, they are experienced.

[call_me_ishmael]

I think Detroit is a very good team that is creative at running. I'm not surprised they ran it down our throat. Our DC sucks. I would like to see them find a better one. Maybe the Saints coach if he gets shit canned.

[texaspackerbacker]

It's kinda weird how so many are panicking here. Ya'all were going crazy about how good Detroit is - I'd still say probably overrated even after the ass-kicking of Thursday night. Then you want to have it both ways - that team you puffed up beat the Packers bad on a bad night, and now it's all doom and gloom. Sheeeesh

LaFleur didn't have the team prepared ...... some guy named McCarthy was guilty of the same thing with a super talented team last Sunday too (as if we never saw that with the Packers). That lack of preparation hasn't happened often for LaFleur - I don't recall ever seeing it before. I think it's safe to say he and the team will bounce back.

Barry needs to be GONE, but we've won a helluva lot of games with his shoddy D before, and we likely will again.

Love didn't do much to diminish the high hopes that we have for him. I may have been a little late to the party on that, but I'm there now.

Things are gonna be all right - all right being the low end of expectations. Any pathetic anti-homer dumbshits thinking otherwise go root for the damn Lions or whatever. I'd still bet that the Packers have a better record than the Lions by the end of the season - there, you ignorant shitheads, retain that to throw back at me if I'm wrong - and fuck anybody that applies to.

[sharpe1027]

In the world of blame for this loss, the blame for the offense is the size of Texas and the defense blame is the size of maybe Vermont.

[Fritz]

In the world of blame for this loss, the blame for the offense is the size of Texas and the defense blame is the size of maybe Vermont.

I would disagree. I’d say the offense’s blame is Texas-size and the defense’s is California-sized.

But Joe Barely’s is Alaska-sized.

And MLF agreed with my post that the defense has enough talent - he said things could be fixed “schematically.” Joe Barely better be all “fluid” and “adaptable” as they say in the business world.