Serious Question: Love vs Clifford

[RashanGary]

It’s been a roller coaster.

They were prepared for the Bears game. And the Bears pass rush was non existent. The Bears also had no clue what an offense designed around Love would look like. Love played really good.

And then the next couple games he was still alright.


I was feeling optimistic at that point. I liked his chances….



And then defenses seemed to adjust and it slowly got worse as the Packers young offense didn’t seem to have answers. Mistakes were everywhere, not just with Love. But I started to doubt.


And now after some improvement, I’m liking his chances more.



He’s done enough to have some hope. But he’s done enough to have doubt too. I’m hoping for the best. He’s still got a shot!

[MadtownPacker]

Fuck this. We don't need a racist poster obviously looking for attention. Go troll somewhere else.

I was thinking SB is complaining about Love NOT being 100% Black and equating that to lack of athleticism. Why he was saying Herbert was killing Pack with his runs, which that Fabio looking mofo was. Everything else was just kardashian-level attention whore mongering.

[sharpe1027]

I was thinking SB is complaining about Love NOT being 100% Black and equating that to lack of athleticism. Why he was saying Herbert was killing Pack with his runs, which that Fabio looking mofo was. Everything else was just kardashian-level attention whore mongering.

He called Love more of a disappointment in his running ability because he's not a pure white person. That's not the same as saying super derogatory shit, but it's still bullshit. I suspect I'm not the only one thinking he's bringing up race in a way to preserve some of half-assed explanation, and yet he is intentionally doing it to get a reaction. It's not adding anything to the discussion and it's just going to continue one way or another.

Not my call, but that's how I see it .

[bobblehead]

He called Love more of a disappointment in his running ability because he's not a pure white person. That's not the same as saying super derogatory shit, but it's still bullshit. I suspect I'm not the only one thinking he's bringing up race in a way to preserve some of half-assed explanation, and yet he is intentionally doing it to get a reaction. It's not adding anything to the discussion and it's just going to continue one way or another.

Not my call, but that's how I see it .

So you're saying skin ate glue in grade school to impress the other kids??

[run pMc]

Twenty years ago Rush Limbaugh made comments about Donovan McNabb being a black QB that cost him a job.

I'm not sure why the race of a player should be relevant, bringing it up seems problematic at best.
I don't care what race Love is, I only care if he's a good player and at least a not-shitty person.

[sharpe1027]

So you're saying skin ate glue in grade school to impress the other kids??

More likely lead paint chips.

[bobblehead]

Twenty years ago Rush Limbaugh made comments about Donovan McNabb being a black QB that cost him a job.

I'm not sure why the race of a player should be relevant, bringing it up seems problematic at best.
I don't care what race Love is, I only care if he's a good player and at least a not-shitty person.

Times were different. Today there are several good black QBs and the best in the game is biracial. The NFL is no longer invested in proving they are giving black QBs a chance. At that time, every Lamaar Jackson that came along was pushed into becoming a WR.

It shouldn't matter. To most it doesn't matter. To some, they need attention desperately so they make it an issue.

[MadtownPacker]

I’m going all Madden on Thursdays game. If Love can lead this team to a win, I will forgive the rest of his obvious deficiencies for the rest of the season. I believe in heroic miracles, but I’m not counting on one. If the bell tolls Thursday, mark my words, I will forgive. Even if, like Sunday, the WRs do most of the heavy lifting. At least the pansy motherfucker threw the football like he intended someone to catch it half the time this week.

Ive been waiting for this.

[QBME]

Ive been waiting for this.

[bobblehead]

I’m going all Madden on Thursdays game. If Love can lead this team to a win, I will forgive the rest of his obvious deficiencies for the rest of the season. I believe in heroic miracles, but I’m not counting on one. If the bell tolls Thursday, mark my words, I will forgive. Even if, like Sunday, the WRs do most of the heavy lifting. At least the pansy motherfucker threw the football like he intended someone to catch it half the time this week.

The mark of character is to own up to your promises. The mark of a troll is to hide when you are looking wrong. The mark of diplomacy is to acknowledge you over stated your position and Love may still end up flopping, but is showing that the jury is still out.

[bobblehead]

Serious Question? Should we just keep bumping this thread until Love has a bad game at which point Skin will bump it for us??

[texaspackerbacker]

It makes more sense than bumping up that idiotic "tank" thread.

The original question was Love or Clifford. As damn near great as Love has been, Clifford probably would be an outstanding back up too if needed.

[run pMc]

We should not, even though we are. I don't think Clifford 's ceiling is more than a backup QB.
Love may not be a 15 year franchise HOF QB but he's the better QB of the two. At this point of the season I think the question has been answered.

[Joemailman]

Serious Question? Should we just keep bumping this thread until Love has a bad game at which point Skin will bump it for us??

Is Skin actually Adam Schein? https://twitter.com/i/status/1687591893402558464

[Joemailman]

Don't think Clifford could have done this:

Zach Kruse
@zachkruse2

Between Weeks 9-12, #Packers QB Jordan Love is...
2nd in EPA/play
7th in success rate
6th in yards per attempt
5th in adj. completion %
7th in CPOE
3rd in TD passes
4th in passer rating
7th in air yards
5th in PFF passing grade
3rd in big time throws 3rd in completions 20+