Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lets see some real analysis of Jordan Love.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lets see some real analysis of Jordan Love.



    Enjoy.

  • #2
    JT is awesome. My favorite analyst. Love is a big post season performance away from being crowned.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

    Comment


    • #3
      I have gone through every episode on love this season. Good and bad.
      Last 3 have felt great
      All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

      George Orwell

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Upnorth View Post
        I have gone through every episode on love this season. Good and bad.
        Last 3 have felt great
        Me too. He’s so interesting. The best out there at teaching the game.
        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

        Comment


        • #5
          Very good stuff. Thanks for sharing.
          C.H.U.D.

          Comment


          • #6
            In Bobble’s glorious GameDay thread, thunderdan, among others, thought it was dumb for Love to take a sack prior to Carlson’s last FG. If you’re gonna take a sack, why not just pound the rock, they burted.

            I was like, yo, Love taking a sack is smart as fuck. Gotta go for the metaphor kill. Incompletion stops clock; turnover is dumb. If nobody’s open, take sack to milk clock further!

            Ole JT agrees with moi. Nobody was open.

            Btw, Welcome back, Cumby. I was sure you were marooned on that desert you love to visit. What’s it called again? Joey’s Tree?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
              In Bobble’s glorious GameDay thread, thunderdan, among others, thought it was dumb for Love to take a sack prior to Carlson’s last FG. If you’re gonna take a sack, why not just pound the rock, they burted.

              I was like, yo, Love taking a sack is smart as fuck. Gotta go for the metaphor kill. Incompletion stops clock; turnover is dumb. If nobody’s open, take sack to milk clock further!

              Ole JT agrees with moi. Nobody was open.

              Btw, Welcome back, Cumby. I was sure you were marooned on that desert you love to visit. What’s it called again? Joey’s Tree?
              Love was trying to get back to the line of scrimmage or at least get every yard he could. Throwing an incomplete pass was the worse outcome.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                In Bobble’s glorious GameDay thread, thunderdan, among others, thought it was dumb for Love to take a sack prior to Carlson’s last FG. If you’re gonna take a sack, why not just pound the rock, they burted.

                I was like, yo, Love taking a sack is smart as fuck. Gotta go for the metaphor kill. Incompletion stops clock; turnover is dumb. If nobody’s open, take sack to milk clock further!

                Ole JT agrees with moi. Nobody was open.

                Btw, Welcome back, Cumby. I was sure you were marooned on that desert you love to visit. What’s it called again? Joey’s Tree?
                And I stand by what I said which isn't what you are inferring. We could absolutely not have an incompletion. We should not have taken a sack or at least not a 10 yard sack.

                The Pack if they were going to throw needed a quick hitter and if it wasn't there Love needed to take off up the middle to save or gain as many yards as possible.

                There was no reason to run a play where the QB need to take a 7 step drop and lose 10 yards. If that was the play call, I would have rather run the ball.
                But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                -Tim Harmston

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                  And I stand by what I said which isn't what you are inferring. We could absolutely not have an incompletion. We should not have taken a sack or at least not a 10 yard sack.

                  The Pack if they were going to throw needed a quick hitter and if it wasn't there Love needed to take off up the middle to save or gain as many yards as possible.

                  There was no reason to run a play where the QB need to take a 7 step drop and lose 10 yards. If that was the play call, I would have rather run the ball.
                  They were aggressive. They probably thought they would catch KC playing the quick hitter and decided the risk reward was worth it. Had they completed a long pass and most everyone would be saying how great it was that they stayed aggressive.

                  Next time we're in a similar situation, the opposing team seeing this might respect the deep ball and the quick pass may be open.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by sharpe1027 View Post
                    Love was trying to get back to the line of scrimmage or at least get every yard he could. Throwing an incomplete pass was the worse outcome.
                    The all-22 seems to say that Love was seeking “John” Wicks for a short out route. DB covering Wicks was in the “pistol force” with outside leverage, blanketing said route. Love had time to throw a 50-50 rock to Doubs outside on a go route. Wisely waved the white flag with 95 of the Chefs zooming in after dominating the double team blocks of Runyan and Tom.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                      And I stand by what I said which isn't what you are inferring. We could absolutely not have an incompletion. We should not have taken a sack or at least not a 10 yard sack.

                      The Pack if they were going to throw needed a quick hitter and if it wasn't there Love needed to take off up the middle to save or gain as many yards as possible.

                      There was no reason to run a play where the QB need to take a 7 step drop and lose 10 yards. If that was the play call, I would have rather run the ball.
                      The playcall might suck, but going for the kill and subsequently taking the sack in that situation do not. As ole JT mentioned, the 48 yarder or so that Carlson made is something any NFL kicker is expected to make.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                        In Bobble’s glorious GameDay thread, thunderdan, among others, thought it was dumb for Love to take a sack prior to Carlson’s last FG. If you’re gonna take a sack, why not just pound the rock, they burted.

                        I was like, yo, Love taking a sack is smart as fuck. Gotta go for the metaphor kill. Incompletion stops clock; turnover is dumb. If nobody’s open, take sack to milk clock further!

                        Ole JT agrees with moi. Nobody was open.

                        Btw, Welcome back, Cumby. I was sure you were marooned on that desert you love to visit. What’s it called again? Joey’s Tree?
                        JT said he should have committed to running as soon as the 1st option was covered. A little more nuanced than what you said, but sure. You called it.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The QB School is a great watch/listen.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                            The playcall might suck, but going for the kill and subsequently taking the sack in that situation do not. As ole JT mentioned, the 48 yarder or so that Carlson made is something any NFL kicker is expected to make.
                            Except Anders has been anything but money as of late.
                            But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                            -Tim Harmston

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Taking the sack was the best option after the play broke down. Seems they tried to go for the endzone to put the game away. Im good with that.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X