Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Predict the new money on Jordan Love’s new deal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Predict the new money on Jordan Love’s new deal

    He’s got a year left on his current deal, so whatever he signs for, this last year will average in and it will be slightly more friendly. But just new money, what’s he going to get?
    17
    3yr 30-35M per
    0%
    0
    3yr 35-40M per
    0%
    0
    3yr 40-45M per
    0%
    1
    3yr 45M+ per
    0%
    0
    4yr 30-35M per
    0%
    1
    4yr 35-40M per
    0%
    1
    4yr 40-45M per
    0%
    4
    4yr 45M+ per
    0%
    3
    5+ 30-35M per
    0%
    1
    5+ 35-40M per
    0%
    0
    5+ 40-45M per
    0%
    3
    5+ 45+M per
    0%
    3
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  • #2
    I went big. It will be too much, but its what the market bears.
    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

    Comment


    • #3
      I would love to see a longer term high incentive contract.

      I voted based on hope.

      I bet it will be in that 3 year 38 to 42 mill range
      All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

      George Orwell

      Comment


      • #4
        Twitter saying it’s gonna be 50 per in new money. Seems a little high to me.
        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

        Comment


        • #5
          We’ll see if Love cares about short term cash OR rings and fame.
          The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
          Vince Lombardi

          "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
            Twitter saying it’s gonna be 50 per in new money. Seems a little high to me.
            And Twitter is never wrong. I said 40-45. We'll see. 50 per year would put him at #5 right now. 45 at #8. 40 at #10. 50 per on an extension can't be ruled out since he's set to make less than 10 in 2024.
            I can't run no more
            With that lawless crowd
            While the killers in high places
            Say their prayers out loud
            But they've summoned, they've summoned up
            A thundercloud
            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
              And Twitter is never wrong. I said 40-45. We'll see. 50 per year would put him at #5 right now. 45 at #8. 40 at #10. 50 per on an extension can't be ruled out since he's set to make less than 10 in 2024.
              I said 40-45 too. Didn’t realize 50 was #5. Damn. They have the last year of his deal 10M. And then two years of franchise tags (40 per) So they already have him on a 3 year 90 deal, practically speaking. That puts him at a disadvantage in negotiations and motivates his side to want to get a deal done.

              50 is fair…. With the way the leverage is in the teams favor, 42.5 seems doable….. But there is the matter of being disrespectful… 47.5M per in new money is my new guess.
              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

              Comment


              • #8
                4 years 47.5M per year in new money
                Add in his one year 10M existing deal

                That brings us to 5 years, 200M. A nice even number. And it’s that magic number where 200M really feels substantial. We can stop the discussion. This is the contract. Write it down in pen because it’s not changing.
                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I want to see him signed long term - as many as 8 or 10 years for more - with a healthy bonus and a strongly backloaded contract that on paper is way up there - $40-50 million per season on average, maybe even more. On the slim chance (IMO) that he turns to shit, this is the NFL, not MLB - they could always cut him before the backloaded part. And if he trends upward from very good now to great in the future, which I see as likely, then we have him signed for the prime of his career.
                  What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Neither side would likely want to do an 8-10 year deal unless the numbers were really in their favor. Reason being is the uncertainty of what the market for a top QB will be that far into the future.
                    I can't run no more
                    With that lawless crowd
                    While the killers in high places
                    Say their prayers out loud
                    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                    A thundercloud
                    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Keep in mind his agent is the same as Danny Dimes. NO WAY it's less than the 4 year 160MIL he signed.

                      I think it's going to in the 45 to 50 range; maybe we REDO his deal for next year and he gives us a bargain to it averages the 40-45 range
                      TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        That's why it would be good for the team - it certainly isn't gonna go down over time. I didn't say I predicted it, I said I WANTED 8 or 10 or more years. The team will likely be pushing for as long as possible. Love and his agent probably won't want quite that much.
                        What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I think it's 4; it gives GB time and Love time to get a bigger deal if he excels. Keep him hungry
                          TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            i'll put this here

                            i got this idea off of some podcast yesterday

                            IF, lefleur doesn't shit the bed by sticking with his good buddy at DC instead had hired an even average DC, we are probably looking at a 10-12 win team that is for sure a solid playoff team

                            in his first year as a starter with targets made up of nothing but rookies and 2nd year guys (one who seems to be always injured), an o-line that is OK at best, and a top weapon RB who has missed about half the year. Love has put up numbers just as good as anyone else

                            the question is. if we had a competent defense (and not one of the worst in the NFL) and were making a solid playoff run, would jordan love, in his first year starting, actually be in the running for the MVP?

                            i think yes. and it blows my mind

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Red, I would argue that if we squeak into the playoffs Love WILL get MVP votes. There was an article on it from one of the packer sites and his numbers are comparable to the contenders. Let me look it up quick.

                              Green Bay Packers QB Jordan Love won't win NFL MVP, but the numbers show why he should at least be in contention.


                              Love: 3,587 passing yards
                              27 passing touchdowns
                              11 interceptions
                              91.8 passer rating
                              3 rushing touchdowns

                              Brock Purdy: 4,050 yards, 29 TDs, 11 INTs, 112.2 rating, 2 rushing TDs
                              Jalen Hurts: 3,636 yards, 20 TDs, 13 INTs, 89.6 rating, 14 rushing TDs
                              Lamar Jackson: 3,357 yards, 19 TDs, 7 INTs, 97.2 rating, 5 rushing TDs
                              Patrick Mahomes: 3,938 yards, 26 TDs, 14 INTs, 91.7 rating
                              Josh Allen: 3,778 yards, 27 TDs, 15 INTs, 93.7 rating, 13 rushing TDs
                              Tua Tagovailoa: 4,214 yards, 26 TDs, 10 INTs, 105.5 rating
                              Dak Prescott: 3,892 yards, 30 TDs, 7 INTs, 104.2 rating, 2 rushing TDs

                              If you factor in what he is working with, he deserves to be in the conversation. Now I'm speculating, but I bet if you looked at late season results he is better than most of that list. I think he only has one pick in the last 5 games.
                              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X