Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Idiotic Internet Articles about The Packers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    As Bugs Bunny would say, “What a maroon.”
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #32
      I haven't seen too many idiotic articles about the Packers...but the amount I have seen about the Bears and how they won the draft, will go 12-5, 13-4, win the NFC North are crazy.
      If you can accept losing, you can't win. - Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by The Weasel View Post
        I haven't seen too many idiotic articles about the Packers...but the amount I have seen about the Bears and how they won the draft, will go 12-5, 13-4, win the NFC North are crazy.
        This is the season for optimism but that they must have gone on AR's psychedelic journey to become this delusional.
        2025 Ratpickers champion.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by The Weasel View Post
          I haven't seen too many idiotic articles about the Packers...but the amount I have seen about the Bears and how they won the draft, will go 12-5, 13-4, win the NFC North are crazy.
          Welcome. I actually think there’s starting to be a resurgence of message boards because Twitter and other social media is so polluted with algorithms that bring up the most negative stuff. Where here we have madtown Hitler whipping us when we drag negative shit into the football forum.
          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

          Comment


          • #35


            Another stupid packer related article. Bak will never take another snap. I said so last year. I stand by it. Its simple. He isn't signing for less than 15 million and no one in their right mind will give him 15 million. Also I'm not sure he even wants to put more stress on that knee for any price given he is already rich beyond anything he can spend.
            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
              https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...e9348c3&ei=181

              Another stupid packer related article. Bak will never take another snap. I said so last year. I stand by it. Its simple. He isn't signing for less than 15 million and no one in their right mind will give him 15 million. Also I'm not sure he even wants to put more stress on that knee for any price given he is already rich beyond anything he can spend.
              My feed on my work machine, using Microsoft Edge or whatever the fuck they call it now, is the absolute worst.

              I open a tab and it's a never-ending scroll of made up or clickbait articles on subjects the algorithms have concluded I am interested in. Whether it's world events, the Packers, scout rifles or hiking, it's all a load of dreck, to put it in polite terms.

              Out of curiosity, I kept scrolling the other day. It just keeps going and going and going.

              It's just gross.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by George Cumby View Post
                My feed on my work machine, using Microsoft Edge or whatever the fuck they call it now, is the absolute worst.

                I open a tab and it's a never-ending scroll of made up or clickbait articles on subjects the algorithms have concluded I am interested in. Whether it's world events, the Packers, scout rifles or hiking, it's all a load of dreck, to put it in polite terms.

                Out of curiosity, I kept scrolling the other day. It just keeps going and going and going.

                It's just gross.
                You can turn that shit off. You don't have to be a slave to the idiotic algorithm.
                2025 Ratpickers champion.

                Comment


                • #38
                  About former Packer Alan Lazard, and the Jets' predicament with his contract:

                  The former undrafted free agent out of Iowa State signed a big four-year, $44M contract to follow his quarterback from Green Bay to New York last year.
                  To "follow" his qb to NY? Really?

                  Lazard signed with the Jets on March 17.
                  Rodgers was traded to the Jets on April 26.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Patler View Post
                    About former Packer Alan Lazard, and the Jets' predicament with his contract:



                    To "follow" his qb to NY? Really?

                    Lazard signed with the Jets on March 17.
                    Rodgers was traded to the Jets on April 26.
                    I think by March 17 it was pretty clear where Rodgers was going. Rodgers announced on March 15 his desire was to play for the Jets.
                    I can't run no more
                    With that lawless crowd
                    While the killers in high places
                    Say their prayers out loud
                    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                    A thundercloud
                    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                      I think by March 17 it was pretty clear where Rodgers was going. Rodgers announced on March 15 his desire was to play for the Jets.
                      You still can't follow someone who hasn't gone yet. Besides, Rodgers' desire was only a factor. GB and another trade partner could have convinced him to go somewhere else, or GB could have just kept him if the Jets offered too little.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        March 15, 2023: The Rodgers era in Green Bay unofficially ends after he reveals his desire to go to the Jets, telling McAfee: "I made it clear my intention was to play and to play for the Jets, and I haven't been holding anything up." Rodgers says the holdup in the deal is the Packers' trade demands. A Packers team source says negotiations are "ongoing" but that the team will trade him.
                        It was clear where Rodgers was going. The Jets were the only team interested, which is why there was all the debate over who had "leverage". On paper, did Lazard follow Rodgers to the Jets? No. But in his mind, and that of the Jets, he certainly did.
                        I can't run no more
                        With that lawless crowd
                        While the killers in high places
                        Say their prayers out loud
                        But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                        A thundercloud
                        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Patler View Post
                          About former Packer Alan Lazard, and the Jets' predicament with his contract:



                          To "follow" his qb to NY? Really?

                          Lazard signed with the Jets on March 17.
                          Rodgers was traded to the Jets on April 26.
                          Do you believe Lazard ends up taking all that money from the Jets irrespective of Rodgers direct involvement brokering the deal?

                          Rodgers hadn't yet technically been traded to the Jets in much the same way a lead of 40-3 in the 4th quarter isn't yet technically a win. In my opinion.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Patler View Post
                            You still can't follow someone who hasn't gone yet. Besides, Rodgers' desire was only a factor. GB and another trade partner could have convinced him to go somewhere else, or GB could have just kept him if the Jets offered too little.
                            Technically correct. Lazard doesn't get offered that contract if the Jets aren't working hard to get Rodgers and pretty sure they can get it done. That being said, I am pretty confident that was the best deal Lizard had and was ever going to get. So Lazard was probably taking the deal on it's face value and not just following Rodgers.

                            It's really semantics of what you consider following. I don't think there's a disagreement as to what really happened. The article was technically false, but taken in context, it also probably wasn't completely irrelevant to the point being made.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I believed at the time that Lazard's contract was just further enticement to or comfort for Rodgers. I mean $44M for 4 to Lazard????

                              I wonder what his second-best offer was?

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Patler View Post
                                I believed at the time that Lazard's contract was just further enticement to or comfort for Rodgers. I mean $44M for 4 to Lazard????

                                I wonder what his second-best offer was?
                                He had a sweet offer from footlocker as a shoe salesman - profit sharing, bonuses for meeting sales quotas, even free shoes every three months.
                                "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                                KYPack

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X