Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

One positive thing I see...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by b bulldog
    DD is a pro's pro.
    I love it when the "experts" go on and on about how Favre has no weapons. No help whatsoever. Meanwhile The Donald just gets it done over and over and over again. Now lets get him involved in the redzone offense so we can score some damn points!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by red
      Originally posted by Fritz
      Well, often the secondary's play depends on the pass rush. It's a hardworking bunch but there's no one who provides that constant threat of a sack.

      There are other positives, though. We have a young kicker and punter who are developing. Nick Collins played well in stretches. Jennings caught a TD.

      The young guard Colledge supposedly played okay.

      It's a work in progress.
      the problem is that today, we did get a decent pass rush

      harris and woodson played better today. but collins does look like he's gone backwards in his development, manuel looked pretty solid. bush got burned once that i saw, i think for a td. and Grabby McGoo, is still up to his old tricks and is a liability whenever he's on the field because he can be called for holding or pass interference on almost every single play
      the packers play too much zone coverage, something these players obviously aren't very good at.

      at least i HOPE they're supposed to be playing zone.

      either way, the defensive backfield coach needs to be fired. hasn't he been here since donatell?

      i'm talking about squattenhimer...
      Always respect your opponent, even when you're kicking the crap outta him.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by red

        the problem is that today, we did get a decent pass rush
        I will agree with you up to maybe a 1/4 the way into the 2nd quarter. After that, we allowed Brees to look pretty good and drive his team at will against us. When you are getting pressure, things like the first quarter are going to happen. We could have had Carrol and his clones out there in coverage in the first quarter. The only reason I see squawking on the board about our terrible pass coverage in the secondary is because of our pedestrian defensive line. We really shouldn't be surprised as this is a similar line as last year. Same song, different season.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Chester Marcol
          Originally posted by red

          the problem is that today, we did get a decent pass rush
          I will agree with you up to maybe a 1/4 the way into the 2nd quarter. After that, we allowed Brees to look pretty good and drive his team at will against us. When you are getting pressure, things like the first quarter are going to happen. We could have had Carrol and his clones out there in coverage in the first quarter. The only reason I see squawking on the board about our terrible pass coverage in the secondary is because of our pedestrian defensive line. We really shouldn't be surprised as this is a similar line as last year. Same song, different season.
          Huh? What 4 sacks 2 fumbles and a pick in the first half! CMON we should have dominated this game but the offense couldnt get us up quick enough and far rnough then the secondary failed us.
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Tony Oday
            Originally posted by Chester Marcol
            Originally posted by red

            the problem is that today, we did get a decent pass rush
            I will agree with you up to maybe a 1/4 the way into the 2nd quarter. After that, we allowed Brees to look pretty good and drive his team at will against us. When you are getting pressure, things like the first quarter are going to happen. We could have had Carrol and his clones out there in coverage in the first quarter. The only reason I see squawking on the board about our terrible pass coverage in the secondary is because of our pedestrian defensive line. We really shouldn't be surprised as this is a similar line as last year. Same song, different season.
            Huh? What 4 sacks 2 fumbles and a pick in the first half! CMON we should have dominated this game but the offense couldnt get us up quick enough and far rnough then the secondary failed us.
            Unfortunatley most of that was 1st quarter. Starting in the second quarter I didn't see much of anything as far as pressure from our line, once in awhile doesn't cut it. I really don't think Drew Brees is that good. I'm sorry, but pressure has to come all game long. If an adjustment can be made and we stop getting steady pressure, that just means they figured out our couple moves. Good D-lines dominate all game long. Peppers dominated all game long and the Vikes D-line looked good all game long whenever I switched over to that game. Brees put up some serious numbers and sadly most of it was over 3 quarters.

            Comment


            • #21
              The question is with as bad as the D has looked playing average QB's, what will happen when faced with a good QB(Brady, Donovan,ect). How many yards for Kitna?

              Comment


              • #22
                The one positive is: expectations are so low that it will seem like a minor miracle if we finish with more than last year's 4 wins. The losses aren't quite as depressing as a few years ago. I'd say there are some parts of the team that are playing quite well. The secondary has been the biggest disappointment. At this rate, Schottenheimer will be out of a job next year. Maybe Sanders also.
                "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                Comment

                Working...
                X