If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It's nice that you prop him up while bashing Barnett. Nick comes to play every Sunday and as much, if not more, effort then any guy out there. I just don't get the constant Barnett bashing. I'll stick with Nick. At least HE CAN STAY ON THE FIELD!!!!
I'll take Barnett. Morgan might be a little better when he's healthy, but he seldom stays healthy. I think #56 is really coming into his own the last 1 1/2 years. I'll take a guy who is above average and has played 52 out of a possible 53 games in his career--over a guy who is slightly better that will have played 56 out of a possible 96 games in his career. The dude has never missed less than 3 games in a season, he's out pretty much all of this year, and he missed most of another season in his career. He's the definition of injury prone.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Now Shefter is saying that he will see a specialist in Pittsburgh and this could be the end of his career. He wants to come back next season, but it could be over depending on what the doc says.
"Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
The guy is a good player and I don't see why we had to have one or the other!! They came out a few years apart....Morgan was a site better than Reynolds who we drafted the year he came out!!
Comment