Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nate Clements on trade block

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #1

    Nate Clements on trade block

    we're pretty thin at cb right now, even with blackmon coming back

    from pft.com



    CLEMENTS ON THE BLOCK

    Glazer also reports that players on the trading block include Bills cornerback Nate Clements, Jets running back Derrick Blaylock, Rams defensive end Anthony Hargove, and Cardinals offensive lineman Leonard Davis.

    Glazer reports that the Cardinals are looking for "a pick or a player," and one G.M. got the impression that the Cardinals are simply trying to unload him.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Anyone know anything about the Cardinals O-Linemen Davis? Is he worth getting?

    Comment

    • #3
      Originally posted by Brando19
      Anyone know anything about the Cardinals O-Linemen Davis? Is he worth getting?
      Well, if you look at the Cardinals O-Line over the past few years, and you consider that Arizona is apparently actively trying to get rid of him, that says a lot.
      </delurk>

      Comment

      • #4
        Davis isn't bad, but he's huge. I believe he runs close to 370 pounds. Not really a good fit for the zone blocking scheme. I like our OTs more.
        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

        Comment

        • #5
          Id take clements
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment

          • #6
            Originally posted by Tony Oday
            Id take clements
            Yes, about Clements. He'd be a help for our secondary.

            Davis from AZ currently has a $9 million/year salary. Even at 370, that's a pretty large cost per pound!
            -digital dean

            No "TROLLS" allowed!

            Comment

            • #7
              If Sherman were here, Davis would be a perfect fit at Tackle or Guard...but not in a zone blocking scheme. He's too large. He's also too "slow"...he's not real quick, which you need in a zone scheme.

              Clements....if there was a way, YES.
              "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

              Comment

              • #8
                I think Clements is gonna be a free agent at years end. So if we were to trade for him, we better be ready to lock him up. He's a pretty solid CB.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Get him!

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Who else needs a CB? Who's the competition to get him? I know NE...
                    "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      i'm down with nate, too.
                      Always respect your opponent, even when you're kicking the crap outta him.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        just thought i'd post this, its from the official nate clements website:

                        http://www.nateclements.com/ssp/bio/


                        dude looks a lo like busta rhymes, don't he?
                        Always respect your opponent, even when you're kicking the crap outta him.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Nate's a solid player.

                          The only problem is you only get 1 or 2 high ticket FA's. Do we wanna make our two Woodson and Clements?

                          Two aging CB's?

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Originally posted by KYPack
                            Nate's a solid player.

                            The only problem is you only get 1 or 2 high ticket FA's. Do we wanna make our two Woodson and Clements?

                            Two aging CB's?
                            Drafted in 2001 is hardly aging. Woodsons cap # after this season is relatively small for the remainder of the contract. Harris might be gone by the end of the year. Clements seems like a good idea. Giving up a 1st this season might be too much. We might be drafting top 5.
                            Originally posted by 3irty1
                            This is museum quality stupidity.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              He's listed as born in 1979 which would make him 27 this year.
                              "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X