Wow, what a sloppy article on details. As a Monday morning game, try to identify as many factual errors in it as you can:
Note: If you are coming to this thread late, and read the article sometime after about noon on Monday, you may wonder where some of the comments that follow came from. They won't match with the article. Well, the article was revised several times throughout the morning to correct some of the most obvious errors. You still might find this thread interesting, to understand how poorly the article was first written, and even what errors still remain. You might even find more errors that we have not yet found!
Note: If you are coming to this thread late, and read the article sometime after about noon on Monday, you may wonder where some of the comments that follow came from. They won't match with the article. Well, the article was revised several times throughout the morning to correct some of the most obvious errors. You still might find this thread interesting, to understand how poorly the article was first written, and even what errors still remain. You might even find more errors that we have not yet found!


Comment