Yes, the homepage has a new article....

[Packnut]

Articles

I visit PackerRats for the articles about as much as I buy Playboy for the articles. To me, the articles here are just posts without the chance of any discussion. Unless Patler starts a State of the Salary Cap weekly, every article is just someone's opinion. They add little insite other than into what that person's opinion is. And for an article to call out others' opinions just because they have an uncontested forum to say so is pure crap.

Mad, you've created one of the best areas for a good group of people. The training camp material here is off the charts good. We are lucky enough to have great people attending the events and then come back to report to those of us who can't get there. However, you should kill the articles. Keep the opinions to the forum. Let people feel self rightous somewhere else. If I want to hear how wrong I am and how right someone else is, I'll go back and chat with Tex.

Most of the stuff on JSO and Packernews.com is just the writer's opinion. They through in a few quotes but writers are seldom objective. You stated the articles give no chance for discussion, yet you can do so in this thread. I see no harm in ANYONE writing an article or opinion and have it open for discussion. I thought that was the purpose for this forum- to share, discuss, debate, argue and inform about anything Packer and football related?

If I want hard facts, I'll read ESPN or SI. I for one appreciate anyone who voices their opinion here. (well almost anyone).

[Cheesehead Craig]

And we all appreciate it when you post Packnut. Yes, your beautiful.. topless posts... GAH! lost another keyboard to the drool! Damn you Packnut, you and your topless... breathtaking... posts

[Packnut]

Girls

And we all appreciate it when you post Packnut. Yes, your beautiful.. topless posts... GAH! lost another keyboard to the drool! Damn you Packnut, you and your topless... breathtaking... posts

My friend, nothing I post makes any sense or means anything. I know nothing about football. I just post as an excuse to see my fantasy wives!

[Charles Woodson]

Re: Girls

And we all appreciate it when you post Packnut. Yes, your beautiful.. topless posts... GAH! lost another keyboard to the drool! Damn you Packnut, you and your topless... breathtaking... posts

My friend, nothing I post makes any sense or means anything. I know nothing about football. I just post as an excuse to see my fantasy wives!

wait so im still lost, are they all one person??

[MJZiggy]

Re: Girls

And we all appreciate it when you post Packnut. Yes, your beautiful.. topless posts... GAH! lost another keyboard to the drool! Damn you Packnut, you and your topless... breathtaking... posts

My friend, nothing I post makes any sense or means anything. I know nothing about football. I just post as an excuse to see my fantasy wives!

So noted....

[Bretsky]

For the most part nearly all good points; nice to see Merlin backing off on his Woodson tirade of a while back. IMO that article was overwhelmingly negative and not fair. Bottom line is Woodson is put in a position to be a playmaker since he's covering the #2 WR every week, and at bare minimum he had a very very solid second half of the season.

I'm not quite as high on the OL though; MM covered that group up way too often by keeping extra blockers in. That, along with TT not providing Favre with sufficient receiving help resulted in most of the offensive struggles.

I'm still down the middle on that group.

But overall, again a good read and nice points.


B

[Scott Campbell]

.........no one gives a rats ass what I feel.........

Clever use of the site theme - kudos!

[Merlin]

.........no one gives a rats ass what I feel.........

Clever use of the site theme - kudos!

LOL......someone got it? I can't believe it!

[pittstang5]

Merlin, I applaud you for a good article, not to mention something different to read in this slow time of year. You bring up some good opinions, I agree with most of them.

One part of your article I'd like to add to or express my opinion on concerned the Marquad Manuel situation. I too believe that TT messed up with this guy and he should just bite the bullet and let him go. I don't think he fits this system, he's just too slow. (I do like the way he hits, when he's actually there to hit someone) Anyway, you mentioned Culver as Collins' partner at the safety postion in the near future. I, on the other hand, think Underwood will be the guy next year. Granted, he was hurt early this year, but the guy was tearing it up in practice and pre-season prior to the injury. True, that doesn't mean didly squat, but I look forward to seeing him rebound and hoping he pushes Manuel out the door.

Thanks again for a good read.

[Packnut]

Re: Girls

And we all appreciate it when you post Packnut. Yes, your beautiful.. topless posts... GAH! lost another keyboard to the drool! Damn you Packnut, you and your topless... breathtaking... posts

My friend, nothing I post makes any sense or means anything. I know nothing about football. I just post as an excuse to see my fantasy wives!

wait so im still lost, are they all one person??

Their names are Rachel Hunter, Rebecca Romijn and Daniela Pestova. In my fantasy world I'm married to all 3.

[Merlin]

Merlin, I applaud you for a good article, not to mention something different to read in this slow time of year. You bring up some good opinions, I agree with most of them.

One part of your article I'd like to add to or express my opinion on concerned the Marquad Manuel situation. I too believe that TT messed up with this guy and he should just bite the bullet and let him go. I don't think he fits this system, he's just too slow. (I do like the way he hits, when he's actually there to hit someone) Anyway, you mentioned Culver as Collins' partner at the safety postion in the near future. I, on the other hand, think Underwood will be the guy next year. Granted, he was hurt early this year, but the guy was tearing it up in practice and pre-season prior to the injury. True, that doesn't mean didly squat, but I look forward to seeing him rebound and hoping he pushes Manuel out the door.

Thanks again for a good read.

Opps, my bad. I forgot all about Underwood. However, He does have a problem staying healthy. I think between him and Culver it could be a good battle.

[Charles Woodson]

Merlin, I applaud you for a good article, not to mention something different to read in this slow time of year. You bring up some good opinions, I agree with most of them.

One part of your article I'd like to add to or express my opinion on concerned the Marquad Manuel situation. I too believe that TT messed up with this guy and he should just bite the bullet and let him go. I don't think he fits this system, he's just too slow. (I do like the way he hits, when he's actually there to hit someone) Anyway, you mentioned Culver as Collins' partner at the safety postion in the near future. I, on the other hand, think Underwood will be the guy next year. Granted, he was hurt early this year, but the guy was tearing it up in practice and pre-season prior to the injury. True, that doesn't mean didly squat, but I look forward to seeing him rebound and hoping he pushes Manuel out the door.

Thanks again for a good read.

Opps, my bad. I forgot all about Underwood. However, He does have a problem staying healthy. I think between him and Culver it could be a good battle.

yes merlin i really dissagreed with your article on CW, but it this was a good article none the less, its always nice to see it from someone elses point of view, and on the underwood and collins thing, im really hoping we get Reggie nelson or brandon Merriweather. Nelson is a hawk imo and he could get us some turnovers