Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sporting News 99 Top Free Agents

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
    Funny that they have Kenderick Allen rated higher than Darrion Scott. Scott isn't a star or anything, but how can he not be ranked higher than Allen?
    I was thinking the same thing considering Allen didn't play half the season. I also thought if Allen is there both Cory Williams and Cullen Jenkins have to be above him but neither was on the list.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by bigcoz75
      Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
      Funny that they have Kenderick Allen rated higher than Darrion Scott. Scott isn't a star or anything, but how can he not be ranked higher than Allen?
      Also interesting he's on there and Cullen Jenkins is not. Did I miss something?
      Jenikns is an RFA, that's why he's not on the list. So, if TT tenders him correctly, we should at least have him for this coming year....after that, he's a UFA. I'm betting TT will at least tender him the 2nd round tender (new this year) and wait and see if any one bites. If I'm not mistaken, GB will have the right to match any offer thrown his way.

      If no one bites, they'll work on a deal during the summer - beginning of the season and probably have something ironed out half way through the season - much like they did with Wells. If TT low balls him with the lowest tender, say good bye.

      I'd much rather lock him up now. He's improved every year and finally playing where I always thought he should.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by pittstang5
        Originally posted by bigcoz75
        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
        Funny that they have Kenderick Allen rated higher than Darrion Scott. Scott isn't a star or anything, but how can he not be ranked higher than Allen?
        Also interesting he's on there and Cullen Jenkins is not. Did I miss something?
        Jenikns is an RFA, that's why he's not on the list. So, if TT tenders him correctly, we should at least have him for this coming year....after that, he's a UFA. I'm betting TT will at least tender him the 2nd round tender (new this year) and wait and see if any one bites. If I'm not mistaken, GB will have the right to match any offer thrown his way.

        If no one bites, they'll work on a deal during the summer - beginning of the season and probably have something ironed out half way through the season - much like they did with Wells. If TT low balls him with the lowest tender, say good bye.

        I'd much rather lock him up now. He's improved every year and finally playing where I always thought he should.
        Well, nevermind...I just noticed that there are some restricted free agents on that list as well.

        That is odd that Jenkins isn't on that list.

        Comment


        • #34
          These FA lists are entertaining..kind of like dreaming about Pamela Anderson. Yeah, you might be able to get her if you forfeited your future and your soul, but once you saw her up close, not airbrushed, and had to spend some time with her, you'd be mighty disappointed.
          "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

          KYPack

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Fritz
            These FA lists are entertaining..kind of like dreaming about Pamela Anderson. Yeah, you might be able to get her if you forfeited your future and your soul, but once you saw her up close, not airbrushed, and had to spend some time with her, you'd be mighty disappointed.
            Wow, that's two kickass analogies in 2 days for you and Red. Keep 'em coming.
            "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Fritz
              These FA lists are entertaining..kind of like dreaming about Pamela Anderson. Yeah, you might be able to get her if you forfeited your future and your soul, but once you saw her up close, not airbrushed, and had to spend some time with her, you'd be mighty disappointed.

              But instead of really looking at her up close you'd test the goodies and the disappointment would never ever come
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • #37
                Then there is that DB Carroll......
                I never would have thought that there were 27 free agents worse than Carroll.
                "When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time" Max McGee

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by b bulldog
                  Stevens is a pretty boy who drops way to many passes. I'd take Graham over Stevens anyday.
                  Stevens is a little more of a headcase as well. Graham would be a better bet.
                  -digital dean

                  No "TROLLS" allowed!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by green_bowl_packer
                    Then there is that DB Carroll......
                    I never would have thought that there were 27 free agents worse than Carroll.
                    This list is just about in random order. Carroll at 73 is an insult to the players ranked 74-99. Were any of those players cut halfway through the year?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Bretsky
                      Originally posted by Fritz
                      These FA lists are entertaining..kind of like dreaming about Pamela Anderson. Yeah, you might be able to get her if you forfeited your future and your soul, but once you saw her up close, not airbrushed, and had to spend some time with her, you'd be mighty disappointed.

                      But instead of really looking at her up close you'd test the goodies and the disappointment would never ever come
                      Bretsky, if you're "testing the goodies" but not looking at her, then clearly your eyes are closed...in which case a blow up doll would serve the same purpose AND be much cheaper.
                      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                      KYPack

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X