Announcement

**BF4MVP** · 02-06-2007, 11:09 PM

I haven't seen so many mock drafts with Green Bay picking the same player since...well...last year..

Could they all be correct again? I hope so. I really like Lynch..I soured on him as a person due to the allegations of sexual assault, but he was ACCUSED, not CONVICTED..No one knows what happened except Marshawn and the woman accusing him..All that aside, I think as a player, Lynch could be exactly what the Packers need in a runningback..Good size, hits the hole hard, good cutback ability, and big play ability..He is also an effective receiver out of the backfield..I say pick him...

**CyclonePackFan** · 02-07-2007, 12:00 AM

I don't see Mike Griffin dropping to #47, not after the Senior Bowl

**HarveyWallbangers** · 02-07-2007, 12:15 AM

Originally posted by BF4MVP

I haven't seen so many mock drafts with Green Bay picking the same player since...well...last year..

Easy to be correct with the top 5 picks. Much different being correct at #16. I'd say there's a 1 in 10 chance Lynch is wearing Packers Green & Gold next year.

**PackerPro42** · 02-07-2007, 06:49 AM

Although I love the Lynch picks Im seeing, I'd say there's a 1 to 3 chance he wears the Green and Gold. Depending on who drops, the Packers may go after Nelson , Landry, or Lynch, I can't see them going after Jarrett though. He just isn't that impressive and I don't want a Mike Williams 2.

I love the second round pick for the Packers, if that happened we would have two awesome starters right away.

**Fritz** · 02-07-2007, 06:57 AM

Fact is, nobody - not even TT - knows who the Pack will take.

**Bretsky** · 02-07-2007, 07:32 AM

Originally posted by PackerPro42

Although I love the Lynch picks Im seeing, I'd say there's a 1 to 3 chance he wears the Green and Gold. Depending on who drops, the Packers may go after Nelson , Landry, or Lynch, I can't see them going after Jarrett though. He just isn't that impressive and I don't want a Mike Williams 2.

I love the second round pick for the Packers, if that happened we would have two awesome starters right away.

I really think Jarrett is a lot more developed in his route running skills than Williams was

**BallHawk** · 02-07-2007, 07:37 AM

If I remember correctly, Williams was incredibly raw. He also had been out of football for a year. I think it is unfair to compare two receivers to each other just because they went to the same school. You also have to take in mind that USC has produced some pretty good WRs over the years.

**packrulz** · 02-08-2007, 05:30 AM

I would think TT would take Leon Hall over Lynch, although I think Lynch is talented. Denver has proved you can pick up RB's who can produce in the zone blocking scheme in later rounds. I think TT will be looking for a DB to slip to 16, Nelson, Landry, or Hall, one of them might still be there. I could see him trading down too, I think the first round is kind of average and the meat of the draft is in rounds 2-4.

**RashanGary** · 02-08-2007, 06:38 AM

Originally posted by Fritz

Fact is, nobody - not even TT - knows who the Pack will take.

VERY TRUE!!!!

We're too far down to even be close. The best we can do with some accuracy is get it down to 10 players.

**Partial** · 02-08-2007, 06:47 AM

Originally posted by BallHawk

If I remember correctly, Williams was incredibly raw. He also had been out of football for a year. I think it is unfair to compare two receivers to each other just because they went to the same school. You also have to take in mind that USC has produced some pretty good WRs over the years.

They are similiar in size, body composition, speed, speed in and out of cuts, etc.

**BallHawk** · 02-08-2007, 06:50 AM

Originally posted by Partial

Originally posted by BallHawk

If I remember correctly, Williams was incredibly raw. He also had been out of football for a year. I think it is unfair to compare two receivers to each other just because they went to the same school. You also have to take in mind that USC has produced some pretty good WRs over the years.

They are similiar in size, body composition, speed, speed in and out of cuts, etc.

I can't argue with that, so we'll just have to wait and see what his combine numbers are like. I don't think Jarrett will be great, but I think he will be better than Mike Williams.(Not exactly I high standard when you come to think of it.)

**PackerPro42** · 02-08-2007, 06:53 AM

Originally posted by packrulz

I would think TT would take Leon Hall over Lynch, although I think Lynch is talented. Denver has proved you can pick up RB's who can produce in the zone blocking scheme in later rounds. I think TT will be looking for a DB to slip to 16, Nelson, Landry, or Hall, one of them might still be there. I could see him trading down too, I think the first round is kind of average and the meat of the draft is in rounds 2-4.

The only one out of the three of those players I'd be happy with is Nelson. I think Landry is way over hyped and he proved by playing like crap in his bowl game. I'd watched a couple of his games over the season and he didn't impress at all. As for Hall, he has got to be the most over hyped player in the draft. He isn't extremely fast and has mediocre acceleration at best. Not to mention his coverage skills are very raw as well. Nelson on the other hand is a balla. He can straight up play. He proved it through out the season and I wouldn't mind getting him or Lynch at the 16 pick.

**swede** · 02-08-2007, 08:31 AM

No way TT picks an average running back with #16. This team will need the best football player available at pick 16. I doubt Marshawn Lynch is that guy.

**packrulz** · 02-08-2007, 02:48 PM

Originally posted by PackerPro42

Originally posted by packrulz

I would think TT would take Leon Hall over Lynch, although I think Lynch is talented. Denver has proved you can pick up RB's who can produce in the zone blocking scheme in later rounds. I think TT will be looking for a DB to slip to 16, Nelson, Landry, or Hall, one of them might still be there. I could see him trading down too, I think the first round is kind of average and the meat of the draft is in rounds 2-4.

The only one out of the three of those players I'd be happy with is Nelson. I think Landry is way over hyped and he proved by playing like crap in his bowl game. I'd watched a couple of his games over the season and he didn't impress at all. As for Hall, he has got to be the most over hyped player in the draft. He isn't extremely fast and has mediocre acceleration at best. Not to mention his coverage skills are very raw as well. Nelson on the other hand is a balla. He can straight up play. He proved it through out the season and I wouldn't mind getting him or Lynch at the 16 pick.

That's why I feel the first round is so average, or below average, there are lots of question marks with most of these guys, even Lynch has character issues. To me the players that are close to a sure thing are Calvin Johnson, Adrian Peterson, and Reggie Nelson, the rest are iffy, and those 3 will be gone by the time the Packers pick. That's why I wouldn't mind if TT trades down out of the first round for an extra 2nd and 4th round pick. I do think Lynch is talented, if he can stay out of trouble. Maurice Clarrett was talented too but couldn't stay clean. That worries me when you're going to pay him 1st round money.

Announcement

Great Blue North 2-Round Mock

Great Blue North 2-Round Mock

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment