Tweet
Was given permission to seek a trade.
1 Would you want him here?
2.What terms/pick(s) would he go for?
Regards,
The Captain
1 Would you want him here?
2.What terms/pick(s) would he go for?
Regards,
The Captain
-
"Everyone's born anarchist and atheist until people start lying to them" ~ wise philosopher -
I remember he always did well against the Pack."I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley -
He is gonna cost alot and he aint better then Harris or Woodson.
Besides safety is the problem. It is so bad that people actually admit to wanting sharper back in G&G. It really disgusts the hell out me.Comment
-
He doesn't play safety?!?!?!Originally posted by MadtownPacker
*edit* I swore I thought he played safety.
Comment
-
he probably can. but hes the one covering donald driver during the pack/lion games.Comment
-
No way, we have two corners that are better than him and he's not going to play for nickel back salary. He is a big play guy, but I feel like he plays too far off. If he scores on you than it balances out otherwise he will give up some plays.Comment
-
He'll be 30 in May. Don't we have enough old guys in the secondary already?Comment
-
Detroit is unlikely to want to trade anyone to Green Bay.
They'll deal him for a late round pick to a non-NFC north team, or just cut him.
The Vikings will do the same with Fred Smoot.
The Packers still have the option of moving Woodson to safety.more freedom, less government. Go Sarah!Comment
-
he's not better then the two we have, he would cost way to much (trade wise and cap wise)
and like scott said, it doesn't solve the problem of us needing to find an eventuall replacements for harris and woodson, he's just as old as them
so i say no to hollywoodComment
Comment