Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nick Collins, playermaker or just a guy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nick Collins, playermaker or just a guy?

    Whie Collins and every other DB in the Packers secondary were reponsible for giving up quite a few big plays, I think that turnovers are what separate the plamakers from the "just a guy" guys. Well, that and consistancy.

    Collins had 3 picks and 2 forced fumbles, coming up second on the team in TO's forced. I sort of sat back and thought his season was a loss, but looking back, he did impact the game at least 5 times in a big way. "Playmakers" as many like to call the studs to it conistantly and 8 is more of the number we are looking for but for a second year guy, it could be argued he is well on his way.

    Not eveyr player in the league has the ability to change the game. Collins has shown that ability; all he needs is the consistancy. Let's look for some of that in the 07 season and paired with Kampman, Hawk and Woodson I think we have the base for an entertaining and consistantly "game winning" defense.

    The off-season is always time for optimism. I thought I'd stir the koolaid and let the sugar come to the top.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  • #2
    He had a great game against the Bears and showed the speed and tenasity at times that fill him with endless potential. But, I don't know that he'll pull it together and become a stud. I wouldn't say he was solid last year, he was very up and down all season long.

    Comment


    • #3
      He was solid, but didn't make plays his rookie year. He was mostly ordinary the first 2/3 of this year. He started making plays at the end. I'm hoping it was the start of something big for him. There are only a handful of young safeties in the league with his athletic ability and willingness to tackle.
      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

      Comment


      • #4
        My glass if half full for Collins; as TT adds quality to this defense he should only get better. His upside is strong.

        The guys got a ton of talent that needs to be further developed.

        Who is our secondary coach again ? oh crap...............

        Well, I'm still a believer
        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

        Comment


        • #5
          He's up and down for certain but his ups *wicked hits ala Chad Johnson and that game where he knocked Corey Dillon out of the game and everyone thought it was Barnett and 4.38 speed on a tight packed body* are so rare that you have to think he'll get better with experience and maybe put it all together in his 3rd year.
          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

          Comment


          • #6
            I certainly wouldn't put Collins in the "just a guy" category. To me, that description signifies an average player who has tapped out his potential. Collins played very well for a rookie in '05, looked lost and ineffective often in '06, then started to get it together with the rest of the secondary late in '06.

            Right now he's inconsistent with a lot of upside. Let's hope the progress late in the season is more a sign of good things to come, and less a factor of playing some weak offenses down the stretch.

            If Collins was a stock, I'd label him a solid "Buy".
            "My problems with him are his vision and tendency to dance instead of pounding a hole." - Harvey Wallbangers

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by superfan
              I certainly wouldn't put Collins in the "just a guy" category. To me, that description signifies an average player who has tapped out his potential. Collins played very well for a rookie in '05, looked lost and ineffective often in '06, then started to get it together with the rest of the secondary late in '06.

              Right now he's inconsistent with a lot of upside. Let's hope the progress late in the season is more a sign of good things to come, and less a factor of playing some weak offenses down the stretch.

              If Collins was a stock, I'd label him a solid "Buy".
              I'll buy that! 8)
              PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2019,
              PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2018,
              PackerRats Pick'Em 2016-17 Champ + Packers year Survival Football Champ 2017,
              Rats Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2013,
              Ratz Survival Football Champ 2012,
              PackerRats1 Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2006.

              Comment


              • #8
                I dont think his play got better later in the season by coincidence. Not only did he have a few more games under his belt, he got used to the knucklehead he was playing along side. From what I have heard/read, MM tried to manage the defensive secondary while he could barely handle his own position. That had to affect Collins play and I think later in the season he realized that he was his own man and built on that confidence.

                I see nothing but upside for this kid. Especially if he is paired with a good rookie via the draft or Underwood takes over for MM. Putting Collins in a leadership role will only build on his confidence and bring out the playmaker in him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by GregJennings
                  He's up and down for certain but his ups *wicked hits ala Chad Johnson and that game where he knocked Corey Dillon out of the game and everyone thought it was Barnett and 4.38 speed on a tight packed body* are so rare that you have to think he'll get better with experience and maybe put it all together in his 3rd year.
                  i don't agree with calling him a big hitter at this point

                  whats he had in his two year career, 3 or 4 big hits? if a guy comes over the middle he has to put the fear of god in him. he needs to drop someone hard a couple times a game

                  he's more then just a guy, but he's not a play maker yet either, but he might continue to grow into one.

                  if his position coach doesn't continue to retard his progress

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I watched a couple of games this weekend in which Collins had a pick in each (SF, @ Chi)... he played fairly well in both games, so hopefully he'll continue to improve.

                    He tends to be invisible in a lot of games, though... hopefully he's not one of these guys that can do it, but only when he feels like it. Seems like a good kid, even if he isn't very bright.

                    Doesn't seem to have the "punk factor" working against him.
                    wist

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      In 2006, for the most part, he played like "just a guy". As Wist said, he was invisible many games. That doesn't mean that he can't be more than that. This should be a critical year for him. If he is ever going to be more than he has been, we should start to see it this year. If he doesn't step up, they will have to find another safety to be the difference maker back there, and just allow Collins to assume the role of "they other guy" at safety.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        We started to see it at the end of the year. I think more is to come. I know Patler has been critical of his play, but it's not the worst thing if a safety is inevitable. It's better than getting burned all of the time--like Manuel. Anyways, I think he's a pretty big hitter. I've seen him make a number of big hits. When I watch him, I see a safety that isn't just a coverage guy. He'll come up and stick you.
                        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I like it when safties are invisable except on T.O.s and big hits that means they are doing their job
                          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Or that everyone else is doing their jobs. 8)
                            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              About the only guy on a team that I want to be invisible is the punter.
                              wist

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X