I'd love Meachem.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
HIGHLIGHT VIDS - Players the Packers may get!!!!
Collapse
X
-
Yeah, its not like it says "formerly known as.." in their sigs. :POriginally posted by blinded by methI'm confused by GregJennings and CharlesWoodson. I thought NickCollins changed his name to GregJennings and then changed it to CharlesWoodson. Now, I'm all confused. Which one of you used to be NickCollins? And which one did the other one used to be?
Comment
-
I don't care what numbers Nelson put up at the combine, watch his tape, he plays damn fast. I'm starting to think a draft of:
1. Nelson - S
2. Zach Miller -TE - which may be possible after his slow 40 time
3. Antonio Pittman - RB
Would be pretty solid.
Comment
-
Re: Nelson
Cool.Originally posted by Charles WoodsonHarv i use to be Nick Barnett at Christian encourager and a while on here. I went as something diff on JSO..."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Chumpa Este, pendejo!Originally posted by MadtownPackerYeah, its not like it says "formerly known as.." in their sigs. :P
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Anybody answer this could Lorenzo booker fit into our system? hes a fast rb with handsOriginally posted by gbpackfanI don't care what numbers Nelson put up at the combine, watch his tape, he plays damn fast. I'm starting to think a draft of:
1. Nelson - S
2. Zach Miller -TE - which may be possible after his slow 40 time
3. Antonio Pittman - RB
Would be pretty solid.
Comment
-
I have to say "Damn", I really hope Nelson or Landry are there when the pick. They're both beasts. Landry's a hell of an athlete, but from what I've seen he suffers from a little bit of Sharper-itis and tackles pretty high, so I'm not sure that Nelson is a huge downgrade. He's a playmaker and he's intimidating.
Lynch looks to have good vision and a good cut, but marginal speed and he really does run vertically. If we traded down to 20 or so, I'd pick him but he's probably not worth a 16.
Then again, I'm not a scout and neither are any of you.</delurk>
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charles WoodsonAnybody answer this could Lorenzo booker fit into our system? hes a fast rb with handsOriginally posted by gbpackfanI don't care what numbers Nelson put up at the combine, watch his tape, he plays damn fast. I'm starting to think a draft of:
1. Nelson - S
2. Zach Miller -TE - which may be possible after his slow 40 time
3. Antonio Pittman - RB
Would be pretty solid.
Charles,
Lorenzo Booker is a pretty neat back. He may not be big enough, yet, to stand up the punishment of an NFL season. That being said, he could be a playmaker if he was teamed up with Ahman Green. Here is a few highlight vids (small):
A guy I love in round 2 or 3 is ANTONIO PITTMAN from OSU. He knows the ZBS because it is what OSU runs. Watch this!
UNDERRATED!!!!!!!
Comment
-
im impressed with pittman. he makes nice cuts and finds the holes (even the small ones) and hits them well. he doesnt punish defenders the way lynch does but he doesnt go down after getting touched either. he has nice balance. probably not the quickest back but hes got burst too. i think he would be a good fit. id like to learn more about him.
Comment
-
Re: Nelson
Originally posted by Charles WoodsonExplain why thats bad again? :POriginally posted by PacknutNelson's stock took a big hit due to his 40 time according to ESPN's NFL live today.
Harv i use to be Nick Barnett at Christian encourager and a while on here. I went as something diff on JSO...
The good thing about this draft is we can fill ethier position later...
Biggest needs id say are TE, S, RB...
I really cant decide on who to take out of:
Laron Landry
Marshawn Lynch
Reggie Nelson
Technically id rather take Lynch in the first because of the lack of difference making RB in the 2nd round and the depth at safety
Or even take a reciever in one of ther rounds. SO much to choose from. And does any body know what we could get our of Fergie, KGB or Bubba?
It's not bad to me. I'm not caught up in 40 times like others are.
Comment
-
thanks. its nice to know anyway. pittman would be a nice 2nd or 3rd round pick, but i wud like to see him add a bit more bulk. at 195, another 10 lbs or so would probably help more than hurt him when it comes to facing NFL linebackers.Originally posted by gbpackfanSD,
I know combine numbers are highly overrated. But just for fun, Pittman ran a 4.4 and Lynch ran a 4.5 in the 40 at the combine.
Comment


Comment