Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Speculation On Lynch.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Speculation On Lynch.

    I have read a few places and have feared this but I think that the Bills are going to take Lynch in front of us. They are actively trying to shop "What you talkin bout Willis" and will need a new back because the A-train is not the answer. What is a contingency plan for the packers? My suggestion is Michael Bush. He and Morency could be a great tandem.
    Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
    Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

  • #2
    Re: Speculation On Lynch.

    Originally posted by BlueBrewer
    I have read a few places and have feared this but I think that the Bills are going to take Lynch in front of us. They are actively trying to shop "What you talkin bout Willis" and will need a new back because the A-train is not the answer. What is a contingency plan for the packers? My suggestion is Michael Bush. He and Morency could be a great tandem.
    Is Bush a good fit for the ZBS?
    Draft Brandin Cooks WR OSU!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Speculation On Lynch.

      Originally posted by PaCkFan_n_MD
      Originally posted by BlueBrewer
      I have read a few places and have feared this but I think that the Bills are going to take Lynch in front of us. They are actively trying to shop "What you talkin bout Willis" and will need a new back because the A-train is not the answer. What is a contingency plan for the packers? My suggestion is Michael Bush. He and Morency could be a great tandem.
      Is Bush a good fit for the ZBS?
      Good Question, I think he is a good reciever but I don't know what offence Louisville ran.
      Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
      Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Speculation On Lynch.

        Originally posted by BlueBrewer
        Originally posted by PaCkFan_n_MD
        Originally posted by BlueBrewer
        I have read a few places and have feared this but I think that the Bills are going to take Lynch in front of us. They are actively trying to shop "What you talkin bout Willis" and will need a new back because the A-train is not the answer. What is a contingency plan for the packers? My suggestion is Michael Bush. He and Morency could be a great tandem.
        Is Bush a good fit for the ZBS?
        Good Question, I think he is a good reciever but I don't know what offense Louisville ran.
        Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
        Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't think Michael Bush would do well in a ZBS scheme, but he is a helluva talent.

          Big, tall strong guy with a lot of speed, but not much shake.

          He's an upright runner, kinda like Najeh, but even faster.

          He is an intriguing prospect, but I don't think he's a "fit".

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by KYPack
            I don't think Michael Bush would do well in a ZBS scheme, but he is a helluva talent.

            Big, tall strong guy with a lot of speed, but not much shake.

            He's an upright runner, kinda like Najeh, but even faster.

            He is an intriguing prospect, but I don't think he's a "fit".
            On that note I think that MM will incorporate a few counter plays and some other dives and whatnot now that the foundation of the offense was laid with the young linemen. They should be able to open things up this year and might not need prototypical players to fit a ZBS
            Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
            Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

            Comment


            • #7
              My contigency plan rolls by one of the two names:

              Mr. McFadden or Mr. Slaton

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Partial
                My contigency plan rolls by one of the two names:

                Mr. McFadden or Mr. Slaton
                But where will they be drafted.....probably higher than we pick I would imagine. But who knows since we now have a glaring hole at RB.
                Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
                Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

                Comment


                • #9
                  i'd only take bush if we dropped down 10 -15 spots to where he'll be drafted

                  no way do i spend the #16 on him

                  he's good, but not worth that kind of reach

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by red
                    i'd only take bush if we dropped down 10 -15 spots to where he'll be drafted

                    no way do i spend the #16 on him

                    he's good, but not worth that kind of reach
                    I agree completely, I think 16 is way too high. A trade down would be necessary
                    Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
                    Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X