Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

McGahee Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • McGahee Discussion

    When you look over options at RB, is this guy an answer? He's still young at 25 or 26 (I forget which). I think his stats at Buffalo might be a bit deceiving. He avg'd 3.8 the last 2 seasons but everyone who played the Bills had NO RESPECT for their passing game since they hav'nt had a QB. He mostly ran against 7 and 8 in the box so in reality that 3.8 ypc might be damn good. His pass catching skills look adequate.

    It's pretty much a done deal that a #3 pick should be enough to get him according to Clayton. The reason not many other teams are drooling over him is his contract would have to be re-negotiated as this is his last contractual season.

    So then it comes down to these 2 questions. How good would he be in Green Bay and is he worth the contract that he's gonna want? This is scouts inc's latest evaluation:

    Grade: 79 | Key
    Alert: None

    Comment:
    McGahee is big, strong and skilled. He is explosive, powerful and can be effective inside and outside the tackles. He has the speed and acceleration to get downhill quickly and press the hole. He has good lower-body strength and is a natural jump-cutter. He has good vision as a zone runner and good pick-and-slide ability. He can stop and restart smoothly and quickly. He runs with good lean at the second level and will fall forward after contact. He has the burst and speed to bounce outside and turn the corner. He is an effective short-yardage and goal-line runner. He has good receiving skills and is a strong runner after the catch. He can weave and avoid in space. McGahee seemed to wear down late in 2005 and could be an injury risk. He tends to run a little upright and expose his body to big hits. He suffered a serious knee injury in college. He doesn't deliver many big runs, though he runs behind a poor offensive line. He has the size to match up in pass protection but is somewhat inconsistent on the edges.

  • #2
    Yawn. I wouldn't want to see TT give up a pick for an okay guy.
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #3
      mcgahee is a great back, who played with the dreaded broken ribs last year

      however, i have no clue how he would work in a ZBS

      Comment


      • #4
        McGahee

        Originally posted by red
        mcgahee is a great back, who played with the dreaded broken ribs last year

        however, i have no clue how he would work in a ZBS

        Scout's inc states he's a good "zone runner". I would guess that includes a ZBS?

        Comment


        • #5
          Damn good back...

          His low YPC is precisely due to their lack of a passing game - which is the same fate I see for the Packers long term, but I digress - If they could rework his contract into something managable, he'd be a hell of a pick-up.
          wist

          Comment


          • #6
            Personally, I think he's overrated. He's okay. Nothing special.

            I'm actually not all that worried. RB has become one of the easiest positions to fill. Every year there are rookie RBs that come and star right away. Last year, it was the likes of Maurice Jones-Drew, Reggie Bush, and Joseph Addai. As long as you have a good OL, RBs aren't all that tough to find. I loved Ahman, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if a combination of Morency and Chris Brown or Dominic Rhodes were effective.
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              Personally, I think he's overrated. He's okay. Nothing special.
              he beat your ass in FF this year

              Comment


              • #8
                RB

                Originally posted by wist43
                Damn good back...

                His low YPC is precisely due to their lack of a passing game - which is the same fate I see for the Packers long term, but I digress - If they could rework his contract into something managable, he'd be a hell of a pick-up.
                The more I think about it, the more it makes sense. As far a giving up a 3rd, it's a no-brainer. Could be Favre's last season and worrying about the value of a 3rd rd pick is foolish imo. It all comes down to money and what's "acceptable" for a #1 RB. His only negative that I can see is the injury bug, but most backs get banged up.

                Still, getting him wipes out our need at RB and gives Thompson more freedom at 16. McGahee also is an upgrade over Green.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I for one would like to have him over any of the leftover FAs, but that being said I think it is highly unlikely that he would get a big contract extension from TT.
                  Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
                  Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    A 3rd rounder for a known commodity seems like a safe bet. McGahee will probably never lead the league in rushing, but I'll take 1200 yards for the next 3-4 seasons. Last year we got an O-lineman and a backup MLB for our 3rd picks. It seems like a good deal if you can get him to sign an extension.
                    Originally posted by 3irty1
                    This is museum quality stupidity.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      For a 3rd round pick, he's probably worth it. I wonder if that's all Buffalo wants.
                      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                        For a 3rd round pick, he's probably worth it. I wonder if that's all Buffalo wants.
                        If Ted Thompson got Willis McGahee for a third and signed J.Griffith as well and alone fr. FA.

                        Then set up the rest of the season in the draft.

                        Would many Packer fans be disappointed?

                        I wouldn't be.
                        ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                        ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                        ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                        ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          McGahee

                          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                          For a 3rd round pick, he's probably worth it. I wonder if that's all Buffalo wants.
                          This is from Clayton's blog yesterday:

                          Who fits the Bills? The Bills continued to escalate their effort to replace Willis McGahee, who is being shopped in a trade. On Tuesday, they looked at Dominic Rhodes. On Wednesday, it will be Chris Brown of the Titans. It's pretty clear it's going to be hard for the Bills to get more than a third-round choice for McGahee, but they may just have to make the trade anyway. The Ravens apparently are interested if they can't re-sign Jamal Lewis.


                          Today's blog states talks are heating up with Baltimore. Look's like the Ravens are gonna get him......

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Just because Clayton reports it may be hard for Buffalo to get more than a 3rd doesn't mean he can be had for a 3rd. Clayton is good, but Buffalo may just keep him if they don't get a good offer. We'll see. I'd explore it just in case, but it doesn't mean he can be had for a 3rd round pick.
                            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Pick

                              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                              Just because Clayton reports it may be hard for Buffalo to get more than a 3rd doesn't mean he can be had for a 3rd. Clayton is good, but Buffalo may just keep him if they don't get a good offer. We'll see. I'd explore it just in case, but it doesn't mean he can be had for a 3rd round pick.
                              Well, I guess we'll find out when the trade between them is made.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X