Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JS--NICK BARNETT AND NEGOTIATIONS WITH GB

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JS--NICK BARNETT AND NEGOTIATIONS WITH GB

    Barnett wants a new deal
    But Packer says he won't hold out
    By TOM SILVERSTEIN

    tsilverstein@journalsentinel.com
    Posted: March 11, 2007

    Green Bay Packers linebacker Nick Barnett wants to make two things perfectly clear:

    Nick Barnett wants a contract extension, but says he won't holdout.
    He's not going to shortchange himself in negotiations on a short-term contract and he's not going to follow the path Javon Walker and Mike McKenzie in seeking more money.

    The Packers are in the process of trying to get Barnett signed beyond this, the final year of his contract, and are trying to find common ground with the fifth-year linebacker. Barnett believes he's worth top dollar after starting all but two games in four seasons, leading the team in tackles three consecutive years and serving as a leader of the defense.

    If he's going to give up his shot at unrestricted free agency next season, he's going to want to be compensated well, especially in light of recent free-agent signings like Kansas City's six-year, $24 million contract with linebacker Napoleon Harris, who will pocket a $7.5 million signing bonus. Barnett is scheduled to make about $2 million this year, but his goal is to reach an agreement that would allow him to play with the Packers well into his 30s.

    "Nick is under contract and he will honor his contract," said his agent, Chuck Price. "Holding out is not an option. All he can do is go out and continue to play football and lead the defense and let his performance speak volumes.

    "They want him there, he wants to be there. There's no timeframe for getting it done because he's under contract. But we feel he's a leader of the defense and he's making substantially less than what he's worth. We're hoping we can get a great deal sooner than later."

    Price said that Barnett proved his loyalty to the team last year when he played the final month of the season with a broken hand. Barnett wasn't sure if he would need surgery on the hand, Price said, yet he had the hand placed in a split and wrapped in a club and continued to play.

    He said that kind of dedication showed he wasn't in the same place Walker and McKenzie were when they didn't get what they wanted financially and forced the team to trade them. Barnett, Price said, wants to stay in Green Bay and see through what he started provided the team compensates him fairly.

    Price said people needed to look beyond the fact Barnett has not made it to the Pro Bowl yet when evaluating his ability. He said the fact Barnett has been a starter since being drafted in the first round in 2003 and been among the top producers on defense for the Packers shows his worth to the club.

    If the Packers don't agree that Barnett is as valuable as he thinks, the linebacker is willing to prove it next season and then cash in on unrestricted free agency. If the Packers don't sign him this year and then decide later they want to put the franchise tag on him, it would cost them upwards of $7 million.

    "He wants to stay," Price said. "But it might not be up to Nick. All he's going to do is go out and play. If there's an offer out there for him, he'll know when he gets it. This organization knows Nick wants to be a Packer."

    Price wouldn't say exactly how negotiations have gone between the two sides since the end of the season, but the Packers do appear interested in making a deal. Of course, they are in the driver's seat right now because they know they have Barnett under contract for another year and can sit tight without any worries about next season.

    Barnett, who did not need surgery on his injured hand, which has since healed, can choose not to attend voluntary workout sessions without facing a fine, but Price said anything that he was supposed to be at he would be.

    As for how Barnett and Price see his work in the linebacker market, they don't expect the deal to be similar to those of Brian Urlacher or Ray Lewis or Julian Peterson, but they do expect to be in the second tier, where contracts average from $4.5 million to $6 million per year.

    "He knows there's lesser players making more money," Price said. "He's young, he's got great character and he's been very durable. Those are all the things you're looking for. The only thing that hasn't happened for him is a deep playoff run or a Pro Bowl."

    Packers general manager Ted Thompson has been mum about negotiations with Barnett and it's unclear whether he thinks Barnett has priced himself out of a deal in Green Bay. It could be that he will make Barnett wait until his contract is up before getting serious, the same way he made Aaron Kampman, Ahman Green and others wait.

    But Price would like to get the deal done soon so that both sides can have peace of mind.

    Whether the two sides can find common ground in the days and weeks ahead could determine whether Barnett remains in Green Bay.
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

  • #2
    Couple points

    It is nice to see Nick Barnett wants to stay in GB

    It is nice that he is not holding out for deals similar to the best LB's in the game; he's not there yet but he's a very solid player
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

    Comment


    • #3
      Worst case scenario.

      Nick:
      Nick completes contract 2 million this year.
      Next year Nick gets the franchise tag. 8 million
      2009 Nick gets tagged again 10 million.

      Packers:
      Barnett pouts during his final season.
      Next off season leaves for more money.
      Abdul Hadj (Hodge) becomes starter saving a lot of cap money.

      Fans:
      Fans blame the problem on a Sherman draft pick.
      Fans blame Thompson for drafting a replacement and not being extorted for huge contracts.
      Fans blame Thompson for not throwing money at the problem.

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't see this ending well. Even a contract like Harris' seems out of character for our GM with a MLB.

        His tackle numbers don't do enough for me, but he can play all three downs and hustles like crazy. Too often jumps into wrong hole or over pursues.

        On this one, I wouldn't want to be GM.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #5
          He only wants 6 mil per year at Today's salaries? Shit, lock him up and throw in a front-loaded guarantee that states if he holds out within the first four years of say a six-year deal he has to give it all back.

          Comment


          • #6
            If he's not willing to hold out now, why would you think he'd need a clause keeping him from doing it 4 years into a 6-year deal?
            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

            Comment


            • #7
              Briggs franchise tag is 7.2 million which is the average of the top 5 salaries.
              When hawk signed I heard he was the 5th highest paid LB. No verification offered.

              Hawk is leverage for Barnett, Hodge is leverage for Thompson/Brandt.

              If not done this could be an ugly episode. Barnett has had a different Defensive Coordinator every season.

              It could be they are very close to a deal as this is going on for a while. That last few items they are negotiating is very tough. I know when I'm negotiating contracts it is like cutting fingernails. If you go too far they start screaming. This is not a scream but it is at a very delicate stage.
              If Ted Thompson hates the deal and Barnett hates the deal it is a good deal.

              pbmax could be correct.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by MJZiggy
                If he's not willing to hold out now, why would you think he'd need a clause keeping him from doing it 4 years into a 6-year deal?
                'cause he is a fool if he's willing to accept 6 mil now when players with half his value got 8-9 in free agency. Perhaps he'll be like Adalius Thomas and want a lower contract in total value but will for sure play out.

                Comment


                • #9
                  This is a good sign I read several articles earlier this year where his agent said they would be monitoring Briggs deal and want similar money. I am not a Barnett fan but I would split the distance with them and give him a 5 year 28 million with 10 million guarenteed.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It's obvious that the Packers are not going to make a big splash in Free Agency. The players they are currently looking at, to me, won't be commanding huge salaries. Most, if not all, of the big name Free agents are signed. Why not take the extra money they have now and lock up Barnett for good. "Build through the draft and sign your own," isn't that TT's philosophy.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Maybe that's what TT's trying to do.
                      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Partial
                        He only wants 6 mil per year at Today's salaries? Shit, lock him up and throw in a front-loaded guarantee that states if he holds out within the first four years of say a six-year deal he has to give it all back.
                        I would love to see holdout clauses in contracts, but what player would sign something like that? It might even be against the CBA rules?? Otherwise, you'd think a team would surely put that clause in TO's contract(s)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I think he should get a deal. He is the leader of the defense and had lead the team in tackles for 3 years (probably would have lead this last year but a Guy named Hawk came about). He's great in pass coverage and is decent in run defense (look what happend when he was out when we played the seahawks). Because of all of that, I think he earned a new contract, no question. If kampman earned the contract he got with his play, barnett totally has earned a new one as well.

                          I would find out right now, during contract negoiations to see if he would be able to move to the outside as well.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by The_Dude
                            I would find out right now, during contract negoiations to see if he would be able to move to the outside as well.
                            Last season when there was all the talk about Hodge playing the middle, Barnett said flat out in interviews that he didn't want to move outside but would do what was best for the team. That said, I don't think he'd want the option written directly into his contract.
                            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MJZiggy
                              Originally posted by The_Dude
                              I would find out right now, during contract negoiations to see if he would be able to move to the outside as well.
                              Last season when there was all the talk about Hodge playing the middle, Barnett said flat out in interviews that he didn't want to move outside but would do what was best for the team. That said, I don't think he'd want the option written directly into his contract.
                              I think he said that he wouldn't move outside unless he got another contract or an extension.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X