I'm not sure this has been discussed anywhere here, but it is an interesting case. Its an example of a "bad signing" by a team trying to get over the hump, so to speak. Seattle made it to the Super Bowl, but Wistrom never became the factor they thought he would.
Wistrom signed a six-year, $33 million contract in 2004, which included $14 million in guaranteed money, Seattles largest ever at the time.
He had 11.5 sacks and 98 tackles in three years for Seattle. He missed 7 games in 2004.
With the cap having skyrocketed the last two years, this will not have a crippling effect on Seattle's future. It is more interesting to think about the efffect it has had the three years he was with the team,with significant cap money tied up in a player that was not making a difference.[/quote]
Wistrom signed a six-year, $33 million contract in 2004, which included $14 million in guaranteed money, Seattles largest ever at the time.
He had 11.5 sacks and 98 tackles in three years for Seattle. He missed 7 games in 2004.
With the cap having skyrocketed the last two years, this will not have a crippling effect on Seattle's future. It is more interesting to think about the efffect it has had the three years he was with the team,with significant cap money tied up in a player that was not making a difference.[/quote]



Comment