Combine all the polls in 1 post, from different sites...

[packers11]

Ill start off... (on randy moss)

http://www.packerchatters.com/

3-13-2007 - Do you want Randy Moss in the Green Bay Packers green & gold?
Yes, he can help the team 787
No, he is to much of a problem 139

Total votes: 926
Thanks for voting!

[packers11]

https://www.packerrats.com

Should the Pack make a trade for WR Randy Moss?
Yes - This move makes them a contender.
73 83.9%

No - He is a disaster waiting to happen.
11 12.6%

I don't care either way.
3 3.4%


Number of Voters : 87
First Vote : Tuesday, 06 February 2007 23:16
Last Vote : Tuesday, 13 March 2007 18:52

[packers11]

packernews.com

http://forums.packersnews.com/viewtopic.php?t=9599

Some MOSS anyone
YES FOR MOSS
94% [ 33 ]
NO FOR MOSS
5% [ 2 ]

Total Votes : 35

Harlan needs to look online, most of these polls are defiantly dominating in the "want moss" category...

[FritzDontBlitz]

after a bit of perusing, i saw the jso poll was against the trade, with almost 14,000 responses.

THE POLL:
---------------------
"Would you like to see Randy Moss in a Packers uniform?"

YES: (43.1%)
NO: (56.9%)

TOTAL VOTES: 13,987

i guess harlan wasnt expressing a bias after all.....

[wist43]

I'd imagine that most of the people surfing the web - with the inclination to weigh in on "polls" such as these - are going to be fairly young, i.e. under 30.

In my experience, most people in their teens and twenties generally don't value intangibles - and "character"??? what the hell is that???; hence, it's understandable why the results would be skewed that way.

Moss is over 30 now, and seems to have shut his yapper to some extent, but in no way do I want him on the Packers.

If he comes - I hope he keeps his mouth shut and plays well; but for me, it will be a sad day for the Packers if they should trade for him.

[red]

after a bit of perusing, i saw the jso poll was against the trade, with almost 14,000 responses.

THE POLL:
---------------------
"Would you like to see Randy Moss in a Packers uniform?"

YES: (43.1%)
NO: (56.9%)

TOTAL VOTES: 13,987

i guess harlan wasnt expressing a bias after all.....

i promise you tex voted about 7,000 times in that poll

[retailguy]

If he comes - I hope he keeps his mouth shut and plays well; but for me, it will be a sad day for the Packers if they should trade for him.

I'm with you. I just don't see the need (ignoring who it is for a moment), when we don't have a RB. What difference will Moss really make without a quality RB?

It won't mean shit.

Who knows, maybe Thompson has a plan...

[Bretsky]

If he comes - I hope he keeps his mouth shut and plays well; but for me, it will be a sad day for the Packers if they should trade for him.

I'm with you. I just don't see the need (ignoring who it is for a moment), when we don't have a RB. What difference will Moss really make without a quality RB?

It won't mean shit.

Who knows, maybe Thompson has a plan...

We have SO many needs; WR certainly has to be one.
Jennings and Driver don't cut it as the only two capable starters

As for RB; don't even go there. We don't even have one capable starter there..........but we still need upgrades at WR.

DL is our only current position of strength

[red]

If he comes - I hope he keeps his mouth shut and plays well; but for me, it will be a sad day for the Packers if they should trade for him.

I'm with you. I just don't see the need (ignoring who it is for a moment), when we don't have a RB. What difference will Moss really make without a quality RB?

It won't mean shit.

Who knows, maybe Thompson has a plan...

i'll agree, and i said it last week when we lost green

if we don't have a decent back for this year, then theres no reason to get moss

it would be a waste for the year or 2 he's here

and if we don't have a back i would rather get a young guy like meachem and let him get ready for the future when we do have a back. of course we won't have favre by then........

my head hurts

how the hell do we not have a fucking RB?

[Bretsky]

If he comes - I hope he keeps his mouth shut and plays well; but for me, it will be a sad day for the Packers if they should trade for him.

I'm with you. I just don't see the need (ignoring who it is for a moment), when we don't have a RB. What difference will Moss really make without a quality RB?

It won't mean shit.

Who knows, maybe Thompson has a plan...

i'll agree, and i said it last week when we lost green

if we don't have a decent back for this year, then theres no reason to get moss

it would be a waste for the year or 2 he's here

and if we don't have a back i would rather get a young guy like meachem and let him get ready for the future when we do have a back. of course we won't have favre by then........

my head hurts

how the hell do we not have a fucking RB?

YES, maybe you guys are right; and my head hurts too pondering the same thing as Red is

[retailguy]

how the hell do we not have a fucking RB?

I'd explain it to you, but it's too damn painful, and if you haven't noticed, it kind of pisses me off....

[RashanGary]

I'd explain it to you, but it's too damn painful, and if you haven't noticed, it kind of pisses me off....

That happens alot when we don't understand the world around us

[retailguy]

I'd explain it to you, but it's too damn painful, and if you haven't noticed, it kind of pisses me off....

That happens alot when we don't understand the world around us

I don't share your sense of humor.