Jimmy Wilkerson Visits Green Bay

[Joemailman]

Who is Jimmy Wilkerson , you ask? Well, so did I. Perhaps he will be signed if KGB is part of a trade for Moss. Here is the little information I have on him.


Jimmy Wilkerson
Ht./Wt.: 6-2/290
Position: DE

Born: 1/4/81, Omaha, TX.
High school: Paul H. Pewitt (Omaha, Texas).
College: Oklahoma.


Career stats | Game logs | Stat splits

2006 game log
Tackles Sacks Takeaways
Wk. Date Opp. Solo Ast. Tot. No. Yds. Fum. Int. Yds. TD
1 9/10 CIN Did not play
2 9/17 @DEN 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
3 Bye week
4 10/1 SF 3 0 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
5 10/8 @ARI 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
6 10/15 @PIT 1 1 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
7 10/22 SD 2 0 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
8 10/29 SEA Did not play
9 11/5 @STL Did not play
10 11/12 @MIA 1 2 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
11 11/19 OAK 1 1 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
12 11/23 DEN 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
13 12/3 @CLE 4 1 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
14 12/10 BAL Did not play
Totals 14 5 19 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0

2006 scouting report
Is versatile, has good initial and closing quickness and can be disruptive on the edge. Can hold his ground and work to the ball. Must add weight and strength and improve his pass-rush skills. Strictly is a backup player.


Career data
Transactions/career notes: Selected after junior season by Kansas City Chiefs in sixth round (189th pick overall) of 2003 NFL draft. ... Signed by Kansas City Chiefs (July 14, 2003). ... Granted free agency (March 11, 2006). ... Re-signed by Chiefs (May 19, 2006).

Statistics

Tackles Sacks Takeaways
Team G GS Solo Ast. Tot. No. Yds. Int. Yds. Long Fum. TD
'03 KC 12 0 6 3 9 0.0 0.0 0 0 - - 0
'04 KC 15 0 7 2 9 0.5 4.5 0 0 - - 0
'05 KC 16 2 15 2 17 0.0 0.0 0 0 - 1 0
'06 KC 12 1 14 5 19 0.0 0.0 0 0 - 1 0
Totals 55 3 42 12 54 0.5 4.5 0 0 0 2 0
2004-06 avg. 14 1 12 3 15 0 2 0 0 0 1 0

[Bretsky]

We can sign about 15 free agents in the salary range of Williams and Walker

[retailguy]

We can sign about 15 free agents in the salary range of Williams and Walker

Great. If we sign those 15 guys maybe we can petition the NFL to keep 75 on the opening day roster, and maybe we can start 26 just because they'll all SUCK.

[Spaulding]

We can sign about 15 free agents in the salary range of Williams and Walker

Great. If we sign those 15 guys maybe we can petition the NFL to keep 75 on the opening day roster, and maybe we can start 26 just because they'll all SUCK.

Is that 26 on offense and another 26 on defense? 52 starters? Me likey

[red]

We can sign about 15 free agents in the salary range of Williams and Walker

Great. If we sign those 15 guys maybe we can petition the NFL to keep 75 on the opening day roster, and maybe we can start 26 just because they'll all SUCK.

Is that 26 on offense and another 26 on defense? 52 starters? Me likey

at least with that many guys on offense we should be able to send out a couple WR's and a TE or two on passing downs instead of having to keep them all in to help keep favre off his ass

[retailguy]

at least with that many guys on offense we should be able to send out a couple WR's and a TE or two on passing downs instead of having to keep them all in to help keep favre off his ass

What makes me laugh is thinking about Morency trying to run behind that line. They need another year of "seasoning". Could be good in 08. Should be sporadic this season as they were late last season.

[MacCool606]

And on defense, there could be twice as many people in the secondary that wouldn't know where they were supposed to be.

[Bretsky]

We can sign about 15 free agents in the salary range of Williams and Walker

Great. If we sign those 15 guys maybe we can petition the NFL to keep 75 on the opening day roster, and maybe we can start 26 just because they'll all SUCK.

Is that 26 on offense and another 26 on defense? 52 starters? Me likey

at least with that many guys on offense we should be able to send out a couple WR's and a TE or two on passing downs instead of having to keep them all in to help keep favre off his ass

this thread provides a dose of humor needed

[BF4MVP]

Who is this cat?!

[HarveyWallbangers]

This guy I'm not very excited about. Relatively, highly touted, but hasn't done much.

[prsnfoto]

at least with that many guys on offense we should be able to send out a couple WR's and a TE or two on passing downs instead of having to keep them all in to help keep favre off his ass

What makes me laugh is thinking about Morency trying to run behind that line. They need another year of "seasoning". Could be good in 08. Should be sporadic this season as they were late last season.

Yeah because we all know that morency had less yards per carry, less explosive runs and did not get almost 500 yards on 35%-40% of the carries as Ahman Green.NOT! There are 31 other teams to cheer for have at it.

[BooHoo]

This guy I'm not very excited about. Relatively, highly touted, but hasn't done much.

That's what I was thinking. Maybe the Pack are trying to spend their transportation budget.

[Partial]

at least with that many guys on offense we should be able to send out a couple WR's and a TE or two on passing downs instead of having to keep them all in to help keep favre off his ass

What makes me laugh is thinking about Morency trying to run behind that line. They need another year of "seasoning". Could be good in 08. Should be sporadic this season as they were late last season.

So, if that is the case, then what exactly do you attribute Morency's higher ypc, higher yac, and triple as many big plays, and a much higher % of big plays per run.

[Fritz]

Jimmy Wilkerson? Isn't that what Mike Montgomery sees when he looks in the mirror?

Frank Walker I'm cool with, but this guy...yawn.

[the_idle_threat]

DY-NO-MIIIIIITE!

Oh wait ... different guy.