Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers look into new deal for Williams

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Packers look into new deal for Williams

    Packers look into new deal for Williams
    By BOB McGINN

    Green Bay - The Green Bay Packers want to extend the contract of defensive tackle Corey Williams before he becomes an unrestricted free agent a year from now.

    "Yeah, I think so," general manager Ted Thompson said. "We've dabbled at it a little bit. He has the ability to rush the passer. I think he's played well."

    Agent Jeff Courtney and team negotiator Andrew Brandt have talked off and on for some time about an extension for the 26-year-old Williams, but tough bargaining has yet to unfold.

    "The best way I could put it is there's clearly a reciprocal interest," Courtney said. "I can't sit here and tell you we're having substantial dialogue on it right now. I think 'dabbled' probably is a pretty good word to use."

    With the free-agent signing period almost two weeks old, the only player signed by the Packers is backup cornerback Frank Walker. They rank fourth in available cap space with $21.757 million, but the top five players at almost every position no longer are available.

    All teams are required to spend 85.2% of their cap in 2007, which in Green Bay's case is $109.653 million.

    The Packers have loads of cap room to unload over the next nine months, and it would appear that their method to do it is give Williams and linebacker Nick Barnett front-loaded extensions before they hit the market next March.

    "We would prefer to identify players that we want going forward and invest in those players," Thompson said. "The best way for us to improve is improve from within."

    The unrestricted market, winnowed by re-signings and seven franchise-player designations, didn't exactly wow Thompson.

    "If I can add a veteran to add to our locker room that would be a high-class individual and show these guys how to play the game, then that'd be good," he said. "But we're not going to get bad guys and we're not going to get guys that are just going to get in the way. If they're just guys, I'm not really interested in them."

    Williams, a sixth-round draft choice from Arkansas State in 2004, wasn't physically or mentally mature enough to hold a starting job that was all but handed to him in '05. He still was languishing as the No. 4 tackle for the first three games of '06 before he came on to start 11 of the last 13.

    "He's come a long way," Courtney said. "I really don't think you've seen the best of him yet."

    Last month, the Packers signed another fourth-year defensive lineman, Cullen Jenkins, to a four-year, $15.84 million deal that included a $4 million signing bonus and $6.8 million in guaranteed money.

    Certainly the Jenkins deal will be used as a comparable for Williams, but Courtney wouldn't say if his client expected more.

    "I don't want to say yes or no," he said. "You see a lot of the new money that's happened recently. I think he's going to obviously make a lot more money. What may be something that could happen now may not be in the future."

    In 1,071 career snaps, Williams has 105 tackles and 26 pressures, including 10 sacks. That's an average of one tackle every 10.2 plays and one pressure every 41.2 plays. His seven sacks in '06 trailed only Oakland's Warren Sapp and Detroit's Cory Redding among all tackles in the league.

    Jenkins has 125 tackles and 63 pressures (13 1/2 sacks) in 1,466 snaps, averages of one tackle every 11.7 plays and one pressure every 23.3 plays.

    "Jenkins is better . . . by a lot," an NFC personnel man said. "Jenkins is big-time on the come. He signed that deal a little bit too early. You can find another Williams."

    For now, at least, Williams is willing to bide his time. An escalator clause in the final year of his four-year contract boosted his '07 base salary from $510,000 to $850,000. He can live with it as the two sides negotiate an agreement that would make it worth his while to give up a chance to strike it rich on the unrestricted market in '08.

    "Corey loves Green Bay and would love to play there for his entire career," Courtney said. "He's a good guy and he doesn't cause any trouble off the field. I think he fits Green Bay well."
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

  • #2
    Re: Packers look into new deal for Williams

    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers

    For now, at least, Williams is willing to bide his time. An escalator clause in the final year of his four-year contract boosted his '07 base salary from $510,000 to $850,000. He can live with it as the two sides negotiate an agreement that would make it worth his while to give up a chance to strike it rich on the unrestricted market in '08.

    "Corey loves Green Bay and would love to play there for his entire career," Courtney said. "He's a good guy and he doesn't cause any trouble off the field. I think he fits Green Bay well."
    Wow, a player that can actually "live with it" at a salary of 850,000. I'm impressed! Usually they can't support their family with anything under 3-4 million. :P

    Comment


    • #3
      All teams are required to spend 85.2% of their cap in 2007, which in Green Bay's case is $109.653 million.

      The Packers have loads of cap room to unload over the next nine months, and it would appear that their method to do it is give Williams and linebacker Nick Barnett front-loaded extensions before they hit the market next March.




      I became ill when reading about more front loading

      TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Packers look into new deal for Williams

        Originally posted by GrnBay007
        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers

        For now, at least, Williams is willing to bide his time. An escalator clause in the final year of his four-year contract boosted his '07 base salary from $510,000 to $850,000. He can live with it as the two sides negotiate an agreement that would make it worth his while to give up a chance to strike it rich on the unrestricted market in '08.

        "Corey loves Green Bay and would love to play there for his entire career," Courtney said. "He's a good guy and he doesn't cause any trouble off the field. I think he fits Green Bay well."
        Wow, a player that can actually "live with it" at a salary of 850,000. I'm impressed! Usually they can't support their family with anything under 3-4 million. :P
        LOL! No doubt, right? I'm sure it's tough for them only having 1 or 2 cars instead of the 10 that is needed to support a family

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bretsky
          All teams are required to spend 85.2% of their cap in 2007, which in Green Bay's case is $109.653 million.

          The Packers have loads of cap room to unload over the next nine months, and it would appear that their method to do it is give Williams and linebacker Nick Barnett front-loaded extensions before they hit the market next March.




          I became ill when reading about more front loading

          Why? That means we'll have lots of cap space again next year and we can have these discussions all over again then. 8)
          "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

          Comment


          • #6
            good!!! DONT TRADE WILLIAMS!!!!

            He is gonna be this years Jenkins! The more Dline pressure, the better our secondary that we will upgrade even further with the draft!!

            I would even take Jenkins 'Lite!!!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MJZiggy
              Originally posted by Bretsky
              All teams are required to spend 85.2% of their cap in 2007, which in Green Bay's case is $109.653 million.

              The Packers have loads of cap room to unload over the next nine months, and it would appear that their method to do it is give Williams and linebacker Nick Barnett front-loaded extensions before they hit the market next March.




              I became ill when reading about more front loading

              Why? That means we'll have lots of cap space again next year and we can have these discussions all over again then. 8)

              Exactly; I need to sleep through every March that the Turtle is our GM
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • #8
                I agree with the "NFC Personnel man" quoted in the 3rd-to-last paragraph.

                I'll be surprised if they pay him what Jenkins got, or even anything near it. Nothing personal against the guy ... he seems to have a great attitude. But I don't think he's that great a player from what I've seen or from what I've read.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Scouts vary on just about every player. I like what I see out of Williams. He had a good second half last year, and he's ready to blossom. Besides, it's cool to have Kris Jenkins' brother and Kevin Williams' cousin on the team.


                  I like our DL. It's underrated. I think they should look to draft a guy in the midrounds because you can never have too many DL, but it's not an urgent priority in my book.
                  "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                    Scouts vary on just about every player. I like what I see out of Williams. He had a good second half last year, and he's ready to blossom. Besides, it's cool to have Kris Jenkins' brother and Kevin Williams' cousin on the team.


                    I like our DL. It's underrated. I think they should look to draft a guy in the midrounds because you can never have too many DL, but it's not an urgent priority in my book.

                    Agree completely; DL is the one position on our team I feel comfortable with.
                    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I look forward to a very good Dline this year. Kampman and Jenkins at end, Picket and Williams in the middle makes some very solid starters. KGB will be good as a backup. If Cole plays well, we'll be in good shape.
                      --
                      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Before Dec. 1st of last year, I would bet most evaluators would have had Williams well above Jenkins. It's amazing how much 4 games at the end of the year has changed the perception of Jenkins.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I found this paragraph interesting.

                          In 1,071 career snaps, Williams has 105 tackles and 26 pressures, including 10 sacks. That's an average of one tackle every 10.2 plays and one pressure every 41.2 plays. His seven sacks in '06 trailed only Oakland's Warren Sapp and Detroit's Cory Redding among all tackles in the league.

                          I think the advantage the Packers have is having functional players rotating so they are all fresh when playing. I don't believe KGB wasn't demoted but rather Jenkins was playing early downs hence "starting".

                          It is a good system. All the guys participate and keep their head in the game. Each feels he is contributing.

                          The system is good for Cory Williams. He would not do as well if he was starting on a poor team or riding the bench on a good team.
                          Negotiating salaries of these players is difficult from other players as the environment is different.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            In 1,071 career snaps, Williams has 105 tackles and 26 pressures, including 10 sacks. That's an average of one tackle every 10.2 plays and one pressure every 41.2 plays. His seven sacks in '06 trailed only Oakland's Warren Sapp and Detroit's Cory Redding among all tackles in the league.

                            When is the last time we had a tackle with that many sacks? Pickett holds the middle well and Kampman,Jenkins, and Williams give us a good shot at 30 sacks thats impressive. I agree with Patler until the last 4 games he was way ahead of Jenkins and has been more healthy lock him up.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Bretsky
                              All teams are required to spend 85.2% of their cap in 2007, which in Green Bay's case is $109.653 million.

                              The Packers have loads of cap room to unload over the next nine months, and it would appear that their method to do it is give Williams and linebacker Nick Barnett front-loaded extensions before they hit the market next March.




                              I became ill when reading about more front loading

                              Bretsky, I can't for the life of me understand why you are "ill" about front-loading contracts. That's like preferring to put a major purchase on a 19% interest rate credit card instead of paying cash.

                              Why wouldn't you want to target the guys you have that you want in your future, and re-sign them to front-loaded contracts so if they break down or lose effectiveness in the future you won't have to pay big dollars for no production?

                              Can you explain? I just don't get it, my man.
                              "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                              KYPack

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X