Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Updated Poll - Moss & Lynch or Peterson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by retailguy
    neither. Take the best player at 16. Start to fill holes with the 2nd round pick.

    We need a WR, but we don't need Moss.
    I pretty much agree. If Moss didn't have the baggage, he still wouldn't be worth a 2nd round pick right now. His production has been spiraling downhill for years.

    I would consider taking him on for a 5th rounder or later, also given that he restructers his contract as well. Anything in the top 4 rounds is too much.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Partial

      - If it weren't for his injury this year, Peterson would without question be one of the best prospects to come out in years.
      Even before the injury, he was no Reggie Bush.

      Comment


      • #18
        Lynch

        In reality Lynch fits our scheme better than Peterson. IF we get Lynch at 16, I think most of the Packer nation will exhale a sigh of relief.......

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by retailguy
          neither. Take the best player at 16. Start to fill holes with the 2nd round pick.

          We need a WR, but we don't need Moss.
          I go on the record as agreeing whole-heartedly with you, Retail.

          You're starting to think like TT.
          [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

          Comment


          • #20
            Cliffy would shit a brick at you all. You'd rather have two solid players than one phenominal player?

            Technically, Marshawn might be a better "zone" runner. But you're kidding yourself if you don't think you can plug in AP in any scheme out there and get intense amounts of production.

            Comment


            • #21
              Lynch

              Originally posted by Partial
              Cliffy would shit a brick at you all. You'd rather have two solid players than one phenominal player?

              Technically, Marshawn might be a better "zone" runner. But you're kidding yourself if you don't think you can plug in AP in any scheme out there and get intense amounts of production.

              May-be you missed the trend in this league towards RB's who can catch the ball coming out of the back-field. It's a HUGE asset for any offense and adds a dimension we really need. Lynch is better than Peterson at this point in their careers. Not just my opinion, but most of the scouts agree.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Partial
                Technically, Marshawn might be a better "zone" runner. But you're kidding yourself if you don't think you can plug in AP in any scheme out there and get intense amounts of production.
                That, and consider the fact that he'll probably be arrested at least twice in his career.
                "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by swede

                  I go on the record as agreeing whole-heartedly with you, Retail.

                  You're starting to think like TT.

                  Nah, it'll NEVER happen. I care about winning TODAY, this season, not just about the future. Both can be done.

                  And, you'd better be careful about agreeing with me. There are several here who will make your life pretty miserable!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Partial
                    I say Peterson for a slew of reasons:
                    Whether we want to admit it or not, Moss is nothing more than a stopgap that will slow the development of Greg Jennings.
                    Then would you say the same thing about A-rod and Favre?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I'd rather eat than fast.

                      2-for, is better than one.

                      Let's win baby with Favre in 2007.

                      ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                      ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                      ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                      ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I've been looking for this thread for awhile. Turns out it doesn't deliver

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          How much more peterson ghey butt lust thread bumping are we going to have to endure?
                          "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by SkinBasket
                            How much more peterson ghey butt lust thread bumping are we going to have to endure?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              i'd still take lynch and moss over ap...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X