First of all, Arrington wasn't even interested in GB until we had $19 mil left. Subtract $5 mil for rookies and we have $14 mil. Arrington signed for (about) $5 mil per year (at current deal). That would put Woodson and Arrington at $15.5 mil. I must change my statement a bit, we COULD have gotten them both if we prorated part of Woodson's cap number. Still, we're mortgaging the future again.
Again, the Redskins have been “mortgaging†their future for years now and every off season, they continue to overpay players. No cap hell in sight for them; shows that they are managing their cap efficiently and signing players to creative, cap-friendly contracts.
If Washington can make it work, and they are subjected to the same salary cap as any other team in the NFL, then there is no reason the Packers couldn’t also.
Unless ofcourse, your GM is shitty.
Again, the Redskins have been “mortgaging†their future for years now and every off season, they continue to overpay players. No cap hell in sight for them; shows that they are managing their cap efficiently and signing players to creative, cap-friendly contracts.
If Washington can make it work, and they are subjected to the same salary cap as any other team in the NFL, then there is no reason the Packers couldn’t also.
Unless ofcourse, your GM is shitty.


Comment