If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Even if he turns out to be a decent LT, I don't think anyone expects him to be an elite Tackle... 5 is way too early for Brown.
I think this is a very good example of over drafting for need, and bypassing higher rated players.
I'm hoping Minnesota does the same with their pick (by not taking Landry or Peterson if they are there), but I have a feeling they'll wise up and take Peterson.
I'd rank Landry first, Peterson second and Quinn thrid....
We should crush the record around the Packer's pick.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
The Packers? I'm going to have to say Revis, but predicting the 16th pick is pretty much a crapshoot, hell predicting anything right after 10 is good.
"I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi
Even if he turns out to be a decent LT, I don't think anyone expects him to be an elite Tackle... 5 is way too early for Brown.
I think this is a very good example of over drafting for need, and bypassing higher rated players.
I'm hoping Minnesota does the same with their pick (by not taking Landry or Peterson if they are there), but I have a feeling they'll wise up and take Peterson.
Even if he turns out to be a decent LT, I don't think anyone expects him to be an elite Tackle... 5 is way too early for Brown.
I think this is a very good example of over drafting for need, and bypassing higher rated players.
I'm hoping Minnesota does the same with their pick (by not taking Landry or Peterson if they are there), but I have a feeling they'll wise up and take Peterson.
I hope they take Peterson. I do not want to see Brady Quinn two times a year.
"I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley
The Packers? I'm going to have to say Revis, but predicting the 16th pick is pretty much a crapshoot, hell predicting anything right after 10 is good.
I have a feeling Revis will be gone by then. Buffalo?
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
For what its worth, NFLN was saying that a lot of O-line coaches had him rated higher than Thomas.
Some, but a majority have Thomas. You can get that with just about any two players. It's not a shock to me though. A lot of scouts like him.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
The Packers? I'm going to have to say Revis, but predicting the 16th pick is pretty much a crapshoot, hell predicting anything right after 10 is good.
I have a feeling Revis will be gone by then. Buffalo?
Could be MN.
I was thinking that, but Morris thinks the prefer Hall--which I would love. Here's hoping they take one of them.
Preferrably, Hall.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment