B'S VEGAS WORLD- OVER / UNDER FOR PACKER WINS

[Bretsky]

Post Draft Poll; I know there is time left but I thought I'd post this poll to gauge people's gut after the draft.

While improvement is probably more important in TT's quest to rebuild the talent level of this team, record has to be an important measurable as well.
Last year we were 8-8.

If you were laying down a Ben Franklin, and you have to pick one, would you bet that our victory total is over or under 8 wins.

[Joemailman]

I said over. However, this is not an official prediction. Plenty of time for that.

[Lurker64]

Looking at the schedule, right now I think they go 9-7. But it's way early to really know.

[Bretsky]

Looking at the schedule, right now I think they go 9-7. But it's way early to really know.

That would be huge progress; I'm at 7-9

[Spaulding]

My thought is either you believe in the youth movement and the team chemistry and player development being better or you don't buy into that and think we've regressed. Although the schedule looks tougher on paper my gut tells me (I'm an optimist) that we'll go 9-7 as well.

At first our draft left me with more questions than answers and a feeling like having been punched in the gut. But running over the various websites and my draft magazine suggest it's got potential and the majority of the players were leaders and/or the glue for their offensive or defensive sides of the ball.

I think this team will be tough mentally as well as strong in chemistry. Whether that translates to more wins is up in the air but I have to believe we're going to build on last year and progress as long as one of the running backs steps it up.

[MadtownPacker]

Nice sig Mr Bo.

I bet the GDamn HOUSE, FARM or whaterver you want that they will win more then 8!!!

[Bretsky]

Nice sig Mr Bo.

I bet the GDamn HOUSE, FARM or whaterver you want that they will win more then 8!!!

Get in line everybody ; but I want the first bet

[retailguy]

under

[Bretsky]

So I think 2 out of three posters are nuts

tough schedule next year would make achieving nine wins a nice feat for this squad.

Not sure how many votes we'll garner, but I'm hoping for at least 50

[MadtownPacker]

So I think 2 out of three posters are nuts

tough schedule next year would make achieving nine wins a nice feat for this squad.

Not sure how many votes we'll garner, but I'm hoping for at least 50

Crazy?? You said they would win like 4 games last year didnt you? I recall saying 8-8 to 10-6 so you dont know nada!!!

[3irty1]

We'll be fine. Over

[Bretsky]

So I think 2 out of three posters are nuts

tough schedule next year would make achieving nine wins a nice feat for this squad.

Not sure how many votes we'll garner, but I'm hoping for at least 50

Crazy?? You said they would win like 4 games last year didnt you? I recall saying 8-8 to 10-6 so you dont know nada!!!

Your sources are faulty; I said 7-9

[Zool]

What about the even vote?

[Bretsky]

What about the even vote?

That would have been too easy; I was honestly curious as to what % would commit to indicating GB will be over .500 with a more difficult schedule.

[Zool]

Well I voted the under. 7-9 and I'm sticking with it. Pack will lose some games they should win and win some they should lose, but in the end one game +/- from 8-8, and with the AFC West this year, I'm going under.