Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

12-20 and a pissed off Brett Favre! Thanks TT.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 12-20 and a pissed off Brett Favre! Thanks TT.

    How anyone can defend this moron is beyond me. I gave TT time, I watched him pull apart our offense and leave Brett high and dry for the past several seasons. I didn't bash him, I didn't call for his head. I gave the man a chance. But this is it! I have no more to give.

    I pay the Packers thousands of dollars every year. I own stock and have been a loyal fan for over 25 years. So don't tell me I am not a good fan because I don't support my team. I support my team 100%. However, I can not support the actions of Ted Thompson. Thompson needs to understand that there is competition for FA and players available via trade. How many times have we heard of a FA coming into GB for a visit, not be offered a contract and then going to another team and signing THE VERY NEXT DAY? That is Thompson's M.O. for Christ's sake!

    According to Thompson, and some of you, FA cost way too much and are not worth what they are getting from other teams. Well, let me tell you, EVERY FA IS NOT OVER-PRICED. This is what they are getting these days. You have to pay to play boys and girls. TT loves to shop at TJMax. Sometimes you have to go to Niemen Marcus (or whatever high priced store you want to name).

    The second arguement that I want to debunk is "there were no good FA's out there." Really? Dante Stallworth couldn't have helped? Randy McMichael couldn't have helped? Any one of the RBs that were available couldn't have helped? If you dont like these guys, then pick out another player that was available. There were FA's out there that could have helped. The biggest player available via trade was RANDY MOSS. TT could have made this deal happen. He got cold feet and offered them a 5th round draft pick! Insteand of Randy Moss we got JAMES JONES! COME ON!

    Ted Thompson's refusal to actively participate in FA is unexplainable. The Packers had, and still have, boat loads of money under the cap. Brett Favre is more then willing, as we have heard, to give up some of his salary to bring in offensive playmakers. If TT went to Favre and said "I want to trade for this player but I need you to give up a couple of million," you think Favre wouldn't do it? Of course he would! I guarantee you that TT never thought of that. That's right, because TT only knows how to build through the draft. TT is rebuilding for a future that is NEVER going to come. You can't rebuild YEAR AFTER YEAR! At some point, you need your efforts to pay off.

    Think about this. At your job, can you just do 60% of your work and still be employed? Of course not. But for some reason, the brass up in GB are satisfied with TT's efforts even though he REFUSES to use FA to help out our team. He refuses to do his job. He has FAILED and our team will pay for his failure all season long.

    As soon as Brett retires, the process is going to start all over again. The sad reality is, and God I hope I am wrong, we can expect to see average to below average football in GB for at least 5 years.

    Before you slam me, think about what Ted Thompson has given you. A 12-20 record! Think about that, 12-20! And we STINK at home.

    It is one thing to piss off Daren Sharper, but now he has alienated Brett Favre. Ted Thompson has managed to piss off Mike Wahle, Marco Rivera, Daren Sharper, Javon Walker (TT pissed him off long before Favre did) and now Brett Favre. On top of a 12-20 record, I'd say it's time to fire him!

    And if your hanging your hopes on A-Rod. Think again. Watch some of the rookie QBs this year and you'll see some of them just have that IT factor. There is nothing special about A-Rod. Nothing. It will take TT a year or two to figure that out but when the new GM comes in, expect to rebuild all over again.

  • #2
    A post in a different forum...

    WR TDs
    2004: 23
    2005: 12
    2006: 13 (8 by Driver)


    TE TDs
    2004: 7
    2005: 6
    2006: 2 (all Martin)
    HEY ... If DD goes down... packers are really f**ked... I'm starting to get fed up with Teddy too...

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm way past fed up with him.

      I have always felt he has been shafting Favre.

      If I am correct then he has been shafting all Green Bay Packer fans that support Favre's desire to win.
      ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
      ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
      ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
      ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

      Comment


      • #4
        Restocked depth, a young and emerging defense, avoidance of cap hell and saving us from a decade long losing mire after Brett Farve does leave, Thanks TT!

        Comment


        • #5
          Time for Damage Control from Teddy.





          Responding to reports out of Mississippi over the weekend that Packers quarterback Brett Favre was frustrated, Thompson indicated that Favre and the Packers organization hold many of the same goals.

          "I think it's natural for a player to be frustrated from time to time - that's simply being human," said Thompson. "Everyone knows that Brett Favre is all about winning. As an organization, we share that commitment. And we want to win now."


          Thompson wants to win now. Did you get that everyone? I did, and I think its a freakin joke. Thompson always says the right thing. Its not what he says that has people pissed off, its what he does........or more to the point in Thompsons case, its what he has not done.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by PackerBlues
            Time for Damage Control from Teddy.





            Responding to reports out of Mississippi over the weekend that Packers quarterback Brett Favre was frustrated, Thompson indicated that Favre and the Packers organization hold many of the same goals.

            "I think it's natural for a player to be frustrated from time to time - that's simply being human," said Thompson. "Everyone knows that Brett Favre is all about winning. As an organization, we share that commitment. And we want to win now."


            Thompson wants to win now. Did you get that everyone? I did, and I think its a freakin joke. Thompson always says the right thing. Its not what he says that has people pissed off, its what he does........or more to the point in Thompsons case, its what he has not done.

            As expected, it looks to me like he took the high road.

            Comment


            • #7
              Name the team that buit itself around a 34+ year old QB and won consistently or went to the Super Bowl.

              You do that, then I will continue to debate the merits of GM versus QB decision making. Until then, you are all complaining past the graveyard.
              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

              Comment


              • #8
                I have one and they had to cheat the cap to do it.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BradStrand
                  Restocked depth, a young and emerging defense, avoidance of cap hell and saving us from a decade long losing mire after Brett Favre does leave, Thanks TT!

                  1.) We have a slightly above average D. We have two CBs that are very good but will become very average very quick because of their age. We have NO nickelback and we have ONE above average safety. We have NO strong safety, and average SLB and one true defensive end with little or no depth at DE. We have a nice crop of DTs, I'll give you that. I love Hawk and Barnett and believe Collins can be great if he gets is head out of his arse. I do like where the D is going, but our secondary needs help. TT failed to help us there in FA as well.

                  2.) I don't know where you get the idea that the Packers will be any good after Brett retires. We may be good, we may suck. But until we have a QB, we will suck. Aaron Rodgers is going to be an average, at best, QB. He holds onto the ball way to long and doesnt have great field vision. He gets rattled easily and starts whining right on the field. He is soft and already has one gimpy foot. Ingle Martin is a better prospect in my opinion. And that isn't saying much.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by PackerBlues
                    Time for Damage Control from Teddy.





                    Responding to reports out of Mississippi over the weekend that Packers quarterback Brett Favre was frustrated, Thompson indicated that Favre and the Packers organization hold many of the same goals.

                    "I think it's natural for a player to be frustrated from time to time - that's simply being human," said Thompson. "Everyone knows that Brett Favre is all about winning. As an organization, we share that commitment. And we want to win now."


                    Thompson wants to win now. Did you get that everyone? I did, and I think its a freakin joke. Thompson always says the right thing. Its not what he says that has people pissed off, its what he does........or more to the point in Thompsons case, its what he has not done.

                    Actions speak louder then words. TT can talk the talk, but he surely can't walk the walk.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by pbmax
                      Name the team that buit itself around a 34+ year old QB and won consistently or went to the Super Bowl.

                      You do that, then I will continue to debate the merits of GM versus QB decision making. Until then, you are all complaining past the graveyard.

                      So if Ted Thompson signed a couple of FA's with front loaded contracts, like Woodson, the team would be worse off in the long run? Sorry, but that does compute. Signing FAs could help Brett now and the QB of the future. Sigining them to front loaded contracts ensures that we will have cap space in the future. There is no excuse of TT's lack of movement via FA. NONE!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Did you see anyone of Woodson'r caliber in this years FAs who would take a year to year contract?

                        Originally posted by gbpackfan
                        Originally posted by pbmax
                        Name the team that buit itself around a 34+ year old QB and won consistently or went to the Super Bowl.

                        You do that, then I will continue to debate the merits of GM versus QB decision making. Until then, you are all complaining past the graveyard.

                        So if Ted Thompson signed a couple of FA's with front loaded contracts, like Woodson, the team would be worse off in the long run? Sorry. but that does compute. Signing FAs could help Brett now and the QB of the future. Sigining them to front loaded contracts insures that we will have cap space in the future. There is no excuse of TT's lack of movement via FA. NONE!
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by pbmax
                          Did you see anyone of Woodson'r caliber in this years FAs who would take a year to year contract?

                          Originally posted by gbpackfan
                          Originally posted by pbmax
                          Name the team that buit itself around a 34+ year old QB and won consistently or went to the Super Bowl.

                          You do that, then I will continue to debate the merits of GM versus QB decision making. Until then, you are all complaining past the graveyard.

                          So if Ted Thompson signed a couple of FA's with front loaded contracts, like Woodson, the team would be worse off in the long run? Sorry. but that does compute. Signing FAs could help Brett now and the QB of the future. Sigining them to front loaded contracts insures that we will have cap space in the future. There is no excuse of TT's lack of movement via FA. NONE!

                          You are telling me that NO ONE on this list could have helped the Packers. NO ONE?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Nice list there.. hey maybe they can sign Ahmad Carrol... he's a FOUR STAR cornerback there.

                            Free agency blew this year.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              So there was NO player that TT could have traded for or signed in FA that could have helped the Packers this year? Is that what you are saying? The only player that could have helped the Packers was Frank Walker?

                              Just trying to get your thought process. Honestly, I am not being a smart ass. I just want to know.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X