I would consider 07 successful if GB

[GBRulz]

Winning at least 5 home games this year.

[esoxx]

One more thing; right or wrong I'm consistent.

Green Bay had $25,000,000 of cap space to work with this year; TT decided how to utilize that

Green Bay was .500 last year.

Worthy or not we were near a .500 squad and I think it's very practical to say that GB needs to make the playoffs for a success

And if GB does not make the playoffs it was a failure.

And TT is in charge of putting this personnell together as well as the staff so IMO you can attach his label for Green Bay if you choose.

I would not want to be accused of not stating my view when I am trying to get others to as well.


Cheers,
B

[Packers4Ever]

I think 9 and 7 is doable.

As long as two of those 9 include the Bears.

That's a given, pip, But one other thing,
no more losing precious yardage making the
same old mental mistakes - does offsides
ring a bell ?

[Bretsky]

One more thing; right or wrong I'm consistent.

Green Bay had $25,000,000 of cap space to work with this year; TT decided how to utilize that

Green Bay was .500 last year.

Worthy or not we were near a .500 squad and I think it's very practical to say that GB needs to make the playoffs for a success

And if GB does not make the playoffs it was a failure.

And TT is in charge of putting this personnell together as well as the staff so IMO you can attach his label for Green Bay if you choose.

I would not want to be accused of not stating my view when I am trying to get others to as well.


Cheers,
B

I'm honored; I don't get many bows.......quantity over quality is my motto

[Rastak]

One more thing; right or wrong I'm consistent.

Green Bay had $25,000,000 of cap space to work with this year; TT decided how to utilize that

Green Bay was .500 last year.

Worthy or not we were near a .500 squad and I think it's very practical to say that GB needs to make the playoffs for a success

And if GB does not make the playoffs it was a failure.

And TT is in charge of putting this personnell together as well as the staff so IMO you can attach his label for Green Bay if you choose.

I would not want to be accused of not stating my view when I am trying to get others to as well.


Cheers,
B

I'm honored; I don't get many bows.......quantity over quality is my motto

Bretsky, the TT of Packer Rats! (just kidding)

[Bretsky]

One more thing; right or wrong I'm consistent.

Green Bay had $25,000,000 of cap space to work with this year; TT decided how to utilize that

Green Bay was .500 last year.

Worthy or not we were near a .500 squad and I think it's very practical to say that GB needs to make the playoffs for a success

And if GB does not make the playoffs it was a failure.

And TT is in charge of putting this personnell together as well as the staff so IMO you can attach his label for Green Bay if you choose.

I would not want to be accused of not stating my view when I am trying to get others to as well.


Cheers,
B

I'm honored; I don't get many bows.......quantity over quality is my motto

Bretsky, the TT of Packer Rats! (just kidding)

LMAO; comparing me to TT.

If you were in my area I'd be egging your house right now.

But then I'd forget about the urgency and go back to the TV and watch film for next year's draft

[CaliforniaCheez]

One more thing; right or wrong I'm consistent.

Green Bay had $25,000 of cap space to work with this year; TT decided how to utilize that

Green Bay was .500 last year.

Worthy or not we were near a .500 squad and I think it's very practical to say that GB needs to make the playoffs for a success

And if GB does not make the playoffs it was a failure.

And TT is in charge of putting this personnell together as well as the staff so IMO you can attach his label for Green Bay if you choose.

I would not want to be accused of not stating my view when I am trying to get others to as well.


Cheers,
B

So are you now willingly to say Ted is part of the solution instead of part of the problem?

[Brohm]

Now that we are 7-1, I think the bar has to be raised substantially. I would venture hosting/winning any/all home play-off game would be successful.

9-7 or 10-6 would mean a second half collapse at this point (with 2 home games in Dec to boot)

[LL2]

I said 9-7. I'm glad I was wrong! Now I'm thinking 13-3 with a 1st rd bye and home field in 1st game.

[Bretsky]

One more thing; right or wrong I'm consistent.

Green Bay had $25,000 of cap space to work with this year; TT decided how to utilize that

Green Bay was .500 last year.

Worthy or not we were near a .500 squad and I think it's very practical to say that GB needs to make the playoffs for a success

And if GB does not make the playoffs it was a failure.

And TT is in charge of putting this personnell together as well as the staff so IMO you can attach his label for Green Bay if you choose.

I would not want to be accused of not stating my view when I am trying to get others to as well.


Cheers,
B

So are you now willingly to say Ted is part of the solution instead of part of the problem?

He appears to be; I underestimated TT and am willing to admit to that.

The only GM I bow to and give my unconditional faith to is Ron Wolf.

If TT wins a Super Bowl from Green Bay I will do the same for him.

[Deputy Nutz]

I said 10-6 and if the Lions are as good as all the crazies in the media like to believe you have to factor their new found ability to win games. The Packers have 4 more division games and the Vikings have found their wonder boy that now poses a serious threat to the Packers. The Packers have the Cowboys left to play, but they also have St Louis and Oakland left.

Like I said if the Packers went 10-6 or a 11-5 I would still be happy go back a read all these 6-10 posts or 4-12 posts, and be happy for a division title and a home playoff game.

[oregonpackfan]

My initial forecast was 9-7. Who possibly, except for the most delusional Kool-
Aid drinker, would have thought the Packers would be 7-1 at this point in the season?

I also felt it would be a success if the Packers made it to the playoffs. Now, I would want them to win at least 1 playoff game.

[HarveyWallbangers]

I said 8-8. I'd be happy with a playoff berth, but I'm starting to expect us to be playing in the second round of the playoffs.

[Rastak]

I said 8-8. I'd be happy with a playoff berth, but I'm starting to expect us to be playing in the second round of the playoffs.

I can see why. Green Bay is really putting things together thus far. I'm very impressed. Very.

[The Shadow]

I simply look for the league's youngest team to continue to improve - and finding ways to win is part of that.
Honestly don't care all that much about losing in the playoffs (should we make it) - the very fact the arrow is pointed WAY up bodes well for a very successful future.