NFC NORTH PREDICITONS... (not record wise)

[Bretsky]

[quote="Rastak"]

The Vikings still need a QB.

[\quote]


We don't know that. They've got a young guy wiith a great arm and quick feet. How good will he be...I have no idea. Better to say there is a major question mark there.....

Stop getting so nitpicky

I say the Packers need a legit #3 WR, a receiving TE, and a second starting S all the time.............your post makes me think you are TT supporter

[BallHawk]

I'm not worried about the 2nd safety. Out of Manuel, Culver, Rouse, and Underwood, one of them is bound to step up.

[woodbuck27]

[quote="Bretsky"]

The Vikings still need a QB.

[\quote]


We don't know that. They've got a young guy wiith a great arm and quick feet. How good will he be...I have no idea. Better to say there is a major question mark there.....

Stop getting so nitpicky

I say the Packers need a legit #3 WR, a receiving TE, and a second starting S all the time.............your post makes me think you are TT supporter

Big time TT supporter.

[Bretsky]

[quote="woodbuck27"]

The Vikings still need a QB.

[\quote]


We don't know that. They've got a young guy wiith a great arm and quick feet. How good will he be...I have no idea. Better to say there is a major question mark there.....

Stop getting so nitpicky

I say the Packers need a legit #3 WR, a receiving TE, and a second starting S all the time.............your post makes me think you are TT supporter

Big time TT supporter.

Yes, Busted

I bet Rastak loves the Snappper

[Fritz]

Injury always plays such a huge role. If one or two major guys goes down - for any team - it can cause a tumble. Of course, if you're the Bungles, you worry more about arrests than injuries.

[Bretsky]

Injury always plays such a huge role. If one or two major guys goes down - for any team - it can cause a tumble. Of course, if you're the Bungles, you worry more about arrests than injuries.

And that's why you use free agency to supplement the roster as well.

[BEARMAN]

I am saving this post so I can repost it at the end of this season, when you all will have to eat your words of wisdom....

Silly packers, the NFCN belongs to Da BEARS !

Da BEARS win the NFCN (again) and the packers are at the bottom (again). Who cares who's in the middle, the kitties or the vqueens are both better then the pack !

[The Shadow]

It is heartwarming to see the Bears so quickly self-destructing.
And who, exactly, will be quarterbacking for them this season?
(tee hee hee)

[packers11]

I am saving this post so I can repost it at the end of this season, when you all will have to eat your words of wisdom....

Silly packers, the NFCN belongs to Da BEARS !

Da BEARS win the NFCN (again) and the packers are at the bottom (again). Who cares who's in the middle, the kitties or the vqueens are both better then the pack !

Damn... packers were on the bottom this year???

Get hooked on phonics maybe you can learn to read...

[mngolf19]

Surprise -- Packers!!

Disappointment -- Bears

Leader -- Packers

Bottom -- Lions

007 is that kool-aid in your glass? Just kidding. I have to qualify my picks. Surprise is-Lions having more than 5 wins. Disappointment is-Bears as they will struggle all year but I think they may pull out a 10 win year. Leader is-Vikes. Yes, I am drinking the kool-aid. I think the OL needed a year to gel and Jackson won't have to win games for them. And Bottom is-Packers. Hard for me to say that as the Lions are usually a very safe pick here but I just think the Packers depth is hurting a little along with lack of playmakers on the O.

[Zool]

Surprise -- Packers!!

Disappointment -- Bears

Leader -- Packers

Bottom -- Lions

007 is that kool-aid in your glass? Just kidding. I have to qualify my picks. Surprise is-Lions having more than 5 wins. Disappointment is-Bears as they will struggle all year but I think they may pull out a 10 win year. Leader is-Vikes. Yes, I am drinking the kool-aid. I think the OL needed a year to gel and Jackson won't have to win games for them. And Bottom is-Packers. Hard for me to say that as the Lions are usually a very safe pick here but I just think the Packers depth is hurting a little along with lack of playmakers on the O.

Other than RB, which spot on the Vikings is dramatically better than the Packers?

O-line-Maybe, but they weren't lights out last year by any means.
D-Tackles-Maybe depending on Harrell, but I'll take our ends any day of the week.

Im pretty damned sure I'd take our QB and WR's first. LB's theres no question in my mind. Safety is a wash, and I will take our CB's for the next 2 years as well.

Bears D will carry them to 10-11 wins, but they will miss Thomas Jones alot more than they realize right now. They simply shouldn't draft RB's anymore.

Packers will hit 9-7. Surprise, the O-line will be average or better.

Vikes will disappoint because T-Jax will struggle.

Lions will attempt to outscore people with no running game. It wont happen. The lions will be a 4-5 win team.

[GrnBay007]

Surprise -- Packers!!

Disappointment -- Bears

Leader -- Packers

Bottom -- Lions

007 is that kool-aid in your glass? Just kidding. I have to qualify my picks. Surprise is-Lions having more than 5 wins. Disappointment is-Bears as they will struggle all year but I think they may pull out a 10 win year. Leader is-Vikes. Yes, I am drinking the kool-aid. I think the OL needed a year to gel and Jackson won't have to win games for them. And Bottom is-Packers. Hard for me to say that as the Lions are usually a very safe pick here but I just think the Packers depth is hurting a little along with lack of playmakers on the O.

It appears I shared my kool-aid with you. You silly Viking fan!! :P

[Bretsky]

Surprise -- Packers!!

Disappointment -- Bears

Leader -- Packers

Bottom -- Lions

007 is that kool-aid in your glass? Just kidding. I have to qualify my picks. Surprise is-Lions having more than 5 wins. Disappointment is-Bears as they will struggle all year but I think they may pull out a 10 win year. Leader is-Vikes. Yes, I am drinking the kool-aid. I think the OL needed a year to gel and Jackson won't have to win games for them. And Bottom is-Packers. Hard for me to say that as the Lions are usually a very safe pick here but I just think the Packers depth is hurting a little along with lack of playmakers on the O.

Other than RB, which spot on the Vikings is dramatically better than the Packers?

O-line-Maybe, but they weren't lights out last year by any means.
D-Tackles-Maybe depending on Harrell, but I'll take our ends any day of the week.

Im pretty damned sure I'd take our QB and WR's first. LB's theres no question in my mind. Safety is a wash, and I will take our CB's for the next 2 years as well.

Bears D will carry them to 10-11 wins, but they will miss Thomas Jones alot more than they realize right now. They simply shouldn't draft RB's anymore.

Packers will hit 9-7. Surprise, the O-line will be average or better.

Vikes will disappoint because T-Jax will struggle.

Lions will attempt to outscore people with no running game. It wont happen. The lions will be a 4-5 win team.

The Vikings DL is slightly better than Green Bay's IMO
The Vikings OL is better than Green Bay's
The Vikings RB's are better than Green Bay's

TE's for both teams suck

The Packers have the advantage at QB, WR, LB, and CB

Safeties could go either way.

[oregonpackfan]

Surprise = Packers
Disappointment = Bears
Leader = Packers
Bottom = Lions

[HarveyWallbangers]

The Vikings OL is better than Green Bay's

You don't watch many Viking games, do you? They have three big names. One played well last year. Two were average. The other two spots played poorly. It was reminiscent of Green Bay in 2005. We had three good OL in Clifton, Tauscher, and Flanagan/Wells--and yet our OL was pathetic because of two huge sore spots.

I don't know what to make of Birk this year, but I didn't think he played any better than Wells last year. Hutchinson is the best OL on either team. I'd take Clifton over McKinnie. I'd take Tauscher at RT, and I'd probably take Spitz over Hicks.