Re: Favre
WOW! Talk about being overly sensitive and reading more into a few casual statements!
Where did I suggest that you are a Thompson basher? (However, derogatorily referring to him as "Teddy" might lead one to presume that you are.) I did write:
but after all your previous posts, and even the one quoted above seem to imply that Favre is to be absolved of responsibilty, unless his protection is great, his receivers drop few balls and the running game is strong. I would point out your "squarely on TT's shoulders" comment.
I'm sorry, "Favre will be Favre" is really not a suitable analysis. Unfortunately, he is no longer the quarterback he was. So in that regard "Favre can't be Favre", at least not the same one that he used to be.
The simple fact is he, just like all aging athletes, has to adapt his game to is declining performance abilities. He can no longer carry this team. That does not mean he cannot help it or be an important part of that, but there was a time when most would have agreed that a .500 record was almost guaranteed just because he was the QB. He is more dependent on those around him now than he was in the past, and his play should recognize that.
Yes, many of his interceptions came when they were behind. However, too many of them came on first or second down. Even if you are trailing, that is not necessarily the time to take a risk. You have other downs. I'm not going to go back and rehash it, I did that once before, so if you don't want to believe this don't. However, a lot of his interceptions came after the team had driven slowly to a couple first downs, and he seemed to become impatient. I can see calling a play to take a shot, but if its not there, why not make a more cautious decision and wait to play another down? Those are the times that I would like to see him be more cautious.
As I said, his risk-taking no longer yields the benefits it used to. He no longer makes the plays as frequently as he used to. Because of that, he needs to reduce the number of chances that he takes. Again, that's not a criticism of Favre, it's merely recognition of the fact that he is much older than he was at his best. He no longer makes plays as often as he did in the past, nor should he be expected to.
It's interesting because even the article you quoted clearly has MM suggesting that Favre has to make better decisions. That was the whole gist of the article. Did you overlook that in your zeal to point out the writer's comment about the frequency of max protection in the passing game?
Originally posted by Packnut
Where did I suggest that you are a Thompson basher? (However, derogatorily referring to him as "Teddy" might lead one to presume that you are.) I did write:
So Favre is to shoulder none of the blame? Its all TT?
Not the coaches?
not the players?
Not the future Hall of Famer?
I suppose even if Favre were to fall off the ledge and be absolutely horrible you could blame that on TT, because TT is responsible for not having replaced him on the roster.
Not the coaches?
not the players?
Not the future Hall of Famer?
I suppose even if Favre were to fall off the ledge and be absolutely horrible you could blame that on TT, because TT is responsible for not having replaced him on the roster.
I'm sorry, "Favre will be Favre" is really not a suitable analysis. Unfortunately, he is no longer the quarterback he was. So in that regard "Favre can't be Favre", at least not the same one that he used to be.
The simple fact is he, just like all aging athletes, has to adapt his game to is declining performance abilities. He can no longer carry this team. That does not mean he cannot help it or be an important part of that, but there was a time when most would have agreed that a .500 record was almost guaranteed just because he was the QB. He is more dependent on those around him now than he was in the past, and his play should recognize that.
Yes, many of his interceptions came when they were behind. However, too many of them came on first or second down. Even if you are trailing, that is not necessarily the time to take a risk. You have other downs. I'm not going to go back and rehash it, I did that once before, so if you don't want to believe this don't. However, a lot of his interceptions came after the team had driven slowly to a couple first downs, and he seemed to become impatient. I can see calling a play to take a shot, but if its not there, why not make a more cautious decision and wait to play another down? Those are the times that I would like to see him be more cautious.
As I said, his risk-taking no longer yields the benefits it used to. He no longer makes the plays as frequently as he used to. Because of that, he needs to reduce the number of chances that he takes. Again, that's not a criticism of Favre, it's merely recognition of the fact that he is much older than he was at his best. He no longer makes plays as often as he did in the past, nor should he be expected to.
It's interesting because even the article you quoted clearly has MM suggesting that Favre has to make better decisions. That was the whole gist of the article. Did you overlook that in your zeal to point out the writer's comment about the frequency of max protection in the passing game?


Comment