Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers Team Report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Packers Team Report



    PACKERS Team Report

    By Tom Silverstein
    For Sporting News

    June 3, 2007

    If minicamps and OTAs are any kind of barometer, MLB A.J. Hawk appears to be taking the necessary steps toward being a playmaker.

    Hawk's biggest weakness last year was man-to-man pass coverage, so it's significant when he intercepts a couple of passes in practice and looks more comfortable in the defense. If Hawk can master man-to-man, he could add a tremendous boost to the pass defense.

    Though he's not as tall and doesn't have the same wingspan as Brian Urlacher, he has the same kind of speed and that's something the club can exploit. Hawk has the body control to avoid pass penalties and the athletic ability to get in position for interceptions. He is being counted on this year to be more than just a solid player on defense. . . .

    Rookie RB Brandon Jackson did not lose much ground as a result of missing rookie camp because of a mandatory NFL obligation. He came back the following week, buried his nose in the playbook and picked up where the team left off during his absence. Jackson, a low-to-the-ground runner with better quickness than speed and a strong lower body, has the best shot of unseating Vernand Morency for the starting running back job.

    Morency put on 10 pounds during the offseason and has better open-field speed than Jackson. Morency has experience in the zone system, but Jackson also seems to be a good fit for it.

    SCOUTING REPORT:

    QB Aaron Rodgers has improved his overall body strength and as a result has a little more snap in his arm. The stronger he gets, the more confident he should be in the pocket.

    But Rodgers has to prove he's not a system quarterback who can do more than paint by the numbers. He has to make quicker decisions and anticipate better where receivers are going to come open. He holds onto the ball too long and often pays the price. There is no strong evidence he has roll-out ability, but he hasn't really gotten a lot of chances to do that. He has a quick release and was very accurate in college, but he needs to show he can consistently complete 17-yard turn-ins and deep outs

    IMPACT NEWCOMER:

    DT Justin Harrell will receive every chance to start this season because of his size and athletic ability.

    The team's first-round pick has long, powerful arms that he uses to move blockers out of his way, and has enough quickness to be more than a fire hydrant in the middle. Harrell must prove that a torn biceps is completely healed and that he can shake off the rust of missing most of his senior season at Tennessee.

    He was drafted on potential, but the club thinks he can play right away.

    If he can, he and nose tackle Ryan Pickett could block all traffic in the middle of the defense.

    Tom Silverstein covers the Packers for the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.

    GO PACKERS !!
    ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
    ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
    ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
    ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

  • #2
    Since when was Hawk an MLB?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Tarlam!
      Since when was Hawk an MLB?
      Facts schmacts.
      Originally posted by 3irty1
      This is museum quality stupidity.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Packers Team Report

        Originally posted by woodbuck27
        If he can, he and nose tackle Ryan Pickett could block all traffic in the middle of the defense.
        I'd love to see this! The two form a massive wall for RB's to run into.

        Comment


        • #5
          Not much news here but thanks for posting. Who will be our starting RB? Or is it RB by committee?

          Comment


          • #6
            Does Hawk start in the dime defense ahead of Barnett? Technically, he could be in the middle of no one.

            Originally posted by Zool
            Originally posted by Tarlam!
            Since when was Hawk an MLB?
            Facts schmacts.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment


            • #7
              If Hawk can improve over last year, great. He is a one hell of a player as it is. The guy I would like to see improve, specifically in the passing game however, would be Abdul Hodge. If he can step up that part of his game, the LB position would be shored up quite nicely. If Hawk, Barnett or Pops goes down with an injury, Hodge's ability to cover a reciever needs to improve over where he was last year, or our defense is going to have one hell of a gaping hole in it.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by PackerBlues
                If Hawk can improve over last year, great. He is a one hell of a player as it is. The guy I would like to see improve, specifically in the passing game however, would be Abdul Hodge. If he can step up that part of his game, the LB position would be shored up quite nicely. If Hawk, Barnett or Pops goes down with an injury, Hodge's ability to cover a reciever needs to improve over where he was last year, or our defense is going to have one hell of a gaping hole in it.
                As much as I like Hodge for his run stopping skills, he's always been, and always will be a liability in coverage... I was surprised the Packers picked him, and thought he was miscast in the Packers system. Wouldn't surprise me if they cut Hodge this year.
                wist

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by pbmax
                  Does Hawk start in the dime defense ahead of Barnett? Technically, he could be in the middle of no one.

                  Originally posted by Zool
                  Originally posted by Tarlam!
                  Since when was Hawk an MLB?
                  Facts schmacts.
                  I would prefer to see Hawk in the dime as I view him as being much more instinctive than Barnett will ever be.

                  That said, I don't think it will happen... Barnett, despite his complete lack of instinct for the game, is fast and has been in the system going on three years now... after 2+ years, even Barnett should be able to keep from busting too many coverages.
                  wist

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by wist43
                    As much as I like Hodge for his run stopping skills, he's always been, and always will be a liability in coverage... I was surprised the Packers picked him, and thought he was miscast in the Packers system. Wouldn't surprise me if they cut Hodge this year.
                    I love Hodge. I want Hodge. Barnett is no Hodge, he just has the fortune of being a first rounder and the starts that went with it. TT is enough of a football guy to trade Barnett and start Hodge.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Barnett is 10 times better than Hodge right now, and it's not just because of the system. I was disappointed in the fact that Hodge looked as slow as he did. He looked too slow to fit into any pro system. He can improve--like all young guys. Some of that could just be indecisiveness. I think a lot less of his chances of becoming a solid starter than I did on draft day last year though.
                      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Tarlam!
                        Originally posted by wist43
                        As much as I like Hodge for his run stopping skills, he's always been, and always will be a liability in coverage... I was surprised the Packers picked him, and thought he was miscast in the Packers system. Wouldn't surprise me if they cut Hodge this year.
                        I love Hodge. I want Hodge. Barnett is no Hodge, he just has the fortune of being a first rounder and the starts that went with it. TT is enough of a football guy to trade Barnett and start Hodge.
                        Why would he trade Barnett? They just extended his contract in April...
                        "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          IMO Hodge is not even a lock for a roster spot, much less a replacement for Barnett as a starter at this point. He needs to play a lot better than last year just to stick with the team.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                            IMO Hodge is not even a lock for a roster spot, much less a replacement for Barnett as a starter at this point. He needs to play a lot better than last year just to stick with the team.
                            Hodge sucked last year, and not just in coverage. Unless he wows right off the bat, he could be gone. We drafted enough LB's this year to make him expendable.
                            Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              How is Hodge at special teams? We need help there?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X