Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Best Season For any NFL Receiver--Don Hutson in '42

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Best Season For any NFL Receiver--Don Hutson in '42

    I was just watching the NFL network channel on TV. They stated that the best season any receiver had in the history of the NFL was Packer receiver Don Hutson in '42.

    That year he had 74 receptions and for 1,211 yards and 17 touchdown catches in just an 11 game season! It was fascinating to watch the old game films and see how elusive and sure-handed he was as a receiver.

    At 6'1" and 183 lbs., he just was not that physically big as a player.

    One also has to remember the context of offensive play-calling in those days. Most NFL teams called far more running plays than passing plays.

    During that '42 season, Arnie Herber was the Packers QB.

    The program also showed clips of his playing extremely well as a defensive back since teams played both ways in those days. In '43 he had 8 interceptions in just 10 games.

    Hutson was quoted as saying, "For every pass I catch in a game, I catch 1,000 passes in practice."

    He still holds the highest career average touchdown reception per game of .85 of any receiver in the NFL.

    I remember my father telling me of a game where he saw Hutson catch 4 touchdown passes in a single QUARTER!(it may have been against the Browns--I can't remember).

    My Dad said that after the second touchdown, the other team put two cornerbacks on Hutson. The first one lined up directly on the line of scrimmage across from Hutson. His sole responsibility was to either hold up Hutson on the line and/or knock him off his route. The second cornerback's assginment was to actually cover Hutson if he got past the first corner. Needless to say, they did a pretty poor job of limiting Hutson to catches.

    Hutson was also the team's placekicker for most of his career. He was truly one of the best all-around players the Packers have ever had.

  • #2
    There was no pass interference penalties or other wimpy modern rules.

    Helmets were leather without facemasks.
    Players stayed on the field and weren't offensive or defensive specialists.

    Ol Don changed the game forever but still has the 2nd and 4th highest scoring season through 12 games(the season length then).

    Comment


    • #3
      not gonna lie (and this will piss most off but)... fergy would run circles around hutson in his day.... the game has changed but yes, hutson was the best in his time... by far

      Comment


      • #4
        WWII. A lot of QBs were throwing bombs in N. Africa, a lot of WRs were catching shrapnel overseas, and a lot of cornerbacks were tackling the Nazis. It diminishes Hutson's accomplishments. Still, he was pretty damn good.
        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Pacopete4
          not gonna lie (and this will piss most off but)... fergy would run circles around hutson in his day.... the game has changed but yes, hutson was the best in his time... by far
          I dont understand how people can say that. I was born long after he played and have only seen clips on NFLN so I cant speak on his talent but Hudson would also have advantages for training and health in todays world that he never got in his time.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by MadtownPacker
            Originally posted by Pacopete4
            not gonna lie (and this will piss most off but)... fergy would run circles around hutson in his day.... the game has changed but yes, hutson was the best in his time... by far
            I dont understand how people can say that. I was born long after he played and have only seen clips on NFLN so I cant speak on his talent but Hudson would also have advantages for training and health in todays world that he never got in his time.
            Actually, if what Paco's saying is that if Fergy went back to 1942 he'd be better one must consider that the man is continually injured with some of the best padding and rehab around. Can you imagine Robert Ferguson trying to play iron man football with a leather helmet and the light padding they wore back then? You'd never know what he could do on the field 'cause he wouldn't have a chance of staying healthy...
            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MJZiggy
              Actually, if what Paco's saying is that if Fergy went back to 1942 he'd be better one must consider that the man is continually injured with some of the best padding and rehab around. Can you imagine Robert Ferguson trying to play iron man football with a leather helmet and the light padding they wore back then? You'd never know what he could do on the field 'cause he wouldn't have a chance of staying healthy...
              Thats a great point.

              So whatcha gotta say about that Paco?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                Originally posted by MJZiggy
                Actually, if what Paco's saying is that if Fergy went back to 1942 he'd be better one must consider that the man is continually injured with some of the best padding and rehab around. Can you imagine Robert Ferguson trying to play iron man football with a leather helmet and the light padding they wore back then? You'd never know what he could do on the field 'cause he wouldn't have a chance of staying healthy...
                Thats a great point.

                So whatcha gotta say about that Paco?
                Actually, American men are on average (If I recall the stats correctly) something like 2 inches taller and 10 pounds heavier than the guys that stormed the beaches in Normandy. The point being that nutrition and health are temendously better now than in the 40s. And athletes never trained the way they do now. Of course Fergy would be a better athlete, but whether he would be a wuss is still open for debate.
                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Pacopete4
                  not gonna lie (and this will piss most off but)... fergy would run circles around hutson in his day.... the game has changed but yes, hutson was the best in his time... by far
                  Ferguson might have ran circles better than Hutson...but he would still be dropping passes and running piss poor routes. Hutson is five times the receiver Ferguson is...in any era you care to compare them.

                  Unlike today's greats, Hutson also played defense (so he was better conditioned) and did not have the offensively-favored rule structure of the modern era to help him.

                  The one advantage Hutson did have was that defensive backs simply were not trained to stop the pass like they are today. He didn't have DBs like Deion Sanders or Ronnie Lott roaming the secondary.
                  My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by The Leaper
                    Originally posted by Pacopete4
                    not gonna lie (and this will piss most off but)... fergy would run circles around hutson in his day.... the game has changed but yes, hutson was the best in his time... by far
                    The one advantage Hutson did have was that defensive backs simply were not trained to stop the pass like they are today. He didn't have DBs like Deion Sanders or Ronnie Lott roaming the secondary.
                    Hutson and other receivers of his era had to contend with the tackling techniques of DB's that are outlawed today.

                    The same program highlighted DB Dick "Night Train" Lane who played with the LA Rams and Detroit Lions. Lane frequently used the "Clothesline" type of tackle where he grabbed the offensive player by the head and neck and wrestlyed him to the ground. Lane also used his forearm to the head as a tackling technique. He could not have used those tackling styles in today's football era.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by oregonpackfan
                      Originally posted by The Leaper
                      Originally posted by Pacopete4
                      not gonna lie (and this will piss most off but)... fergy would run circles around hutson in his day.... the game has changed but yes, hutson was the best in his time... by far
                      The one advantage Hutson did have was that defensive backs simply were not trained to stop the pass like they are today. He didn't have DBs like Deion Sanders or Ronnie Lott roaming the secondary.
                      Hutson and other receivers of his era had to contend with the tackling techniques of DB's that are outlawed today.

                      The same program highlighted DB Dick "Night Train" Lane who played with the LA Rams and Detroit Lions. Lane frequently used the "Clothesline" type of tackle where he grabbed the offensive player by the head and neck and wrestlyed him to the ground. Lane also used his forearm to the head as a tackling technique. He could not have used those tackling styles in today's football era.

                      I believe Mr. Ferguson is rather familiar with the "clothesline" technique.....

                      Ohhh that was nasty. And for the record, I think Ziggy nailed it, that's what I was thinking.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Pacopete4
                        not gonna lie (and this will piss most off but)... fergy would run circles around hutson in his day.... the game has changed but yes, hutson was the best in his time... by far
                        What a load of BS. Fergy may be a little faster flat out than Hutson was but he is no where near the player Hutson was. He would not have made it through the first few games of a season.
                        C.H.U.D.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          k, fergy was just a smartass comment.. my point was that players today are just better. Hutson might have been the greatest for that era, but he wouldnt be a name if he was put into todays game. You can call fergy a puss all you want, but he'd be a big dude playing in the 40's and that tackling techniques? ha, it was either hit or miss back then.. they all went for the cheap shot instead of wrapping up

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Pacopete4
                            k, fergy was just a smartass comment.. my point was that players today are just better. Hutson might have been the greatest for that era, but he wouldnt be a name if he was put into todays game. You can call fergy a puss all you want, but he'd be a big dude playing in the 40's and that tackling techniques? ha, it was either hit or miss back then.. they all went for the cheap shot instead of wrapping up

                            If he was in 1942 he wouldn't be that big most likely.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Pacopete4
                              k, fergy was just a smartass comment.. my point was that players today are just better.

                              I see. So by your logic a 2007 Hundai > 1942 Mercedes.

                              Very profound.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X