Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OT : Grateful Freeney signs $72 million deal with Colts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OT : Grateful Freeney signs $72 million deal with Colts



    Grateful Freeney signs $72 million deal with Colts

    Defensive end Dwight Freeney has spent his entire football career chasing and sacking quarterbacks. Now, he's going to be paid as the premier player at his position.

    Freeney, the Indianapolis Colts' franchise player, signed a six-year, $72 million contract with the team Friday that includes a $30 million signing bonus. He becomes the highest-paid defensive player in NFL history.


    "To have me paid among the top players in the league -- not just as a defensive players -- means a lot of me," said Freeney, who flew to Indianapolis on Thursday night in anticipation of accepting the deal. "[Colts general manager] Bill Polian is the one who drafted me. I was hand-picked by him. He was going to do the right thing for the organization."

    Polian drafted Freeney in the first round in 2002 and watched him develop into one of the game's most disruptive defensive players. Freeney registered 56½ sacks during his first five seasons with the Colts and has forced 27 fumbles during his career.

    Freeney and the Colts had until Monday to hammer out a long-term deal. Had that not happened, Freeney and the Colts would have been forced to settle for the one-year tender at $9.43 million, which would have left Freeney to decide whether or not to hold out.

    Neither Polian nor Freeney wanted that to happen. Freeney expressed throughout the offseason that he wanted to remain a Colt. He attended most of the team's offeseason activities while Polian and Freeney's agent, Gary Wichard, worked on an agreement.

    Freeney will receive $37.72 million over the first three years of the contract. In doing the deal, the Colts will save $3.68 million of salary-cap room that they can use to keep other players whose contracts are expiring. The Colts had $3.4 million of cap room before reaching agreement with Freeney.

    "This really shows a commitment," Freeney said. "I have to thank [Colts owner] Jim Irsay and Bill Polian. They have done most of their big deals with the offense prior to this. Now, they've gotten to the defense and the guys who can go out and make some big plays on defense."

    Depending on the way insiders view contracts, Patriots defensive end Richard Seymour had been the league's highest-paid defensive player if you consider the new money in a three-year, $28 million contract he signed in 2006. The Patriots view that deal as a $7.5 million-a-year contract if you include Seymour's salary in 2006.

    Freeney's contract takes the top defensive pay scale to the $12 million-a-year range.

    "I feel great about this because no one usually gets paid for the impact they have on the team," Freeney said. "To have a contract that pays me among the top players in the league and not just for being a defensive player means a lot. Normally, tight ends get paid with other tight ends and offensive linemen get paid with other offensive linemen."

    This deal will have a significant impact on other top pass-rushers who are in negotiations to re-sign with their teams. New Orleans Saints defensive end Will Smith, Carolina Panthers defensive end Julius Peppers and Baltimore Ravens linebacker Terrell Suggs are pass-rushers who were waiting to see how Freeney's negotiations turned out.

    "It's great to see the Colts are paying a guy who stops a quarterback like a quarterback," Freeney said.

    Senior writer John Clayton covers the NFL for ESPN.com.

  • #2
    Kampy's contract looking to be a steal in my opinion...

    Comment


    • #3
      I wouldn't pay him that, but whoa, that GM at Indy really handles the cap well.

      Have a question, tho.

      What does this mean, do ya think?

      -"It's great to see the Colts are paying a guy who stops a quarterback like a quarterback," Freeney said. "-

      Huh, he plays his position like a QB, er what?

      Comment


      • #4
        The good news is that now that Freeney's contract is done his agent can now focus on his other client, Brandon Jackson.

        Hopefully Brandon Jackson now becomes a priority for agent Richard Wichard.

        Comment


        • #5
          Freeney should be grateful ... he's just about washed up and now WAYYYY overpaid.

          Comment


          • #6
            $12 million/year for a non QB?? I know the cap is going up but that is insane. If nothing else to tie that much money on one of 22 starters on your team.

            The price of gas just went up again my friends - time to go hybrid I guess.
            60% of the time it works every time.

            Comment


            • #7
              Peyton Manning and Dwight Freeney budgets take up a fifth of the team's cap. The remaining 80% has to be spent on the other 51 players.

              The Colts are gambling that the cap will increase enough over the years in order to have fewer minimum wage players. I suspect in 2 years they will be losing younger players in free agency and the team will be in decline.

              This can be bad for Freeney. It is possible to have to high a contract and have that cap casualty target on you.

              I heard of the Randy Moss deal the vikings gave him. I said the very moment, "He will not complete that contract." I have now been proven correct.

              The mega record breaking deal the Packers made with Brett Favre has been tweaked a few times but it is one of the few that will be completed.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez
                The mega record breaking deal the Packers made with Brett Favre has been tweaked a few times but it is one of the few that will be completed.
                That deal goes till 2010, or something. Have you looked at your watch?

                That is a deal that will not be completed. IMHO

                Comment


                • #9
                  That deal was designed specifically to never be completed.
                  "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Tarlam!
                    Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez
                    The mega record breaking deal the Packers made with Brett Favre has been tweaked a few times but it is one of the few that will be completed.
                    That deal goes till 2010, or something. Have you looked at your watch?

                    That is a deal that will not be completed. IMHO
                    It was a 10 year deal in 1996 which was extended.

                    As to my watch, what part of Brett Favre do you not understand?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Cali...

                      I think he signed a new extention one in 2001 for 10 more years...

                      "In March 2001, Favre signed to a "lifetime" contract with the Packers, the first in team history which also made Favre the first $100 million player in NFL history."



                      yes it was in march of 01... HOLY SH!T look at the stats to the right, and to think he has caught up and will break most of them this year... Amazing...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The Colts have a HOF QB in his prime. They have a couple year window here and they aren't burried YET. They are doing well to take these stabs while they have the chance just like NE is doing.

                        The Packers time was yesterday and will be tomorrow. The Colts time is right now. VERY different situations. If we were as close as them, I'd be OK with bad signings like this. One SB today (if you think you're that close) is worth giving up tomorrow. You just better hit, unlike in the Sherman years.

                        It's the NE, Indy and SD era. I think SD has the best chance becuase they are younger and stand a better chance to stay healthy but aging teams like Tampa have been known to put enough together to make that final push too. Indy might fall into that category or they might just fall apart with no big payoff like we did.
                        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                          The Colts have a HOF QB in his prime. They have a couple year window here and they aren't burried YET. They are doing well to take these stabs while they have the chance just like NE is doing.

                          The Packers time was yesterday and will be tomorrow. The Colts time is right now. VERY different situations. If we were as close as them, I'd be OK with bad signings like this. One SB today (if you think you're that close) is worth giving up tomorrow. You just better hit, unlike in the Sherman years.

                          It's the NE, Indy and SD era. I think SD has the best chance becuase they are younger and stand a better chance to stay healthy but aging teams like Tampa have been known to put enough together to make that final push too. Indy might fall into that category or they might just fall apart with no big payoff like we did.

                          I look at this as a much more simple concept.

                          Super Bowl or not, in today's largely increasing salary cap era, you don't let a star quality playmaker leave the team.

                          You make it happen; Kudos on Indy for doing this.

                          If Freeney was on the Packers right now I'd want Green Bay to do the same.
                          TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez
                            As to my watch, what part of Brett Favre do you not understand?
                            Gee, Cali, you're right. I am unworthy.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I don't know Bretsky, I think this is a bad signing becuase it might eventually do to Indy what Sharpers contract did to us. Also, pass rushing DE's tend to fall off a little early. He might not be a great player for much more than 2 or 3 years.

                              I don't know if I'd want Freeney right now for that contract but if you compare him to the UFA rate like with Nate Clements it's not so bad. I'd rather sign my own like Freeney for the same price as a guy like Clements gets on the UFA market but I'm not so sure this is a good deal for the team. I don't have a full grasp on how inflation is going to work so I could be wrong. It's just my first reaction. It might just be the price to play poker now-a-days. I haven't really compared it to other similar players with inflation calculated in. It does look better than Clements deal so it's not like a gigantic UFA type rip off but it still seems a little steep as I don't consider Freeney a premium player. I think he's lost a little bit of his edge already. He used to be unstoppable.
                              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X