Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RB Breakdown

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RB Breakdown

    Position-by-position: Running backs
    Posted: July 24, 2007
    On the Packers

    Bob McGinn
    E-MAIL

    Green Bay - For the last decade, the Green Bay Packers ran with either the complete big back in Dorsey Levens or the breakaway muscle back in Ahman Green, with fullback William Henderson as a redoubtable escort.

    From 2002-'05, the Packers enjoyed rare continuity at the position with Green, Henderson, Najeh Davenport and Tony Fisher serving as the lead four backs all four years.

    Even last season, Green was still around to provide Green Bay with its eighth 1,000-yard rusher in 10 years, aided by Henderson.

    Now they're all gone, replaced by a nine-man contingent that includes six players without a snap of regular-season experience and just one, Noah Herron, who even played for Green Bay prior to last season. He arrived in November 2005.

    "Seven straight years Ahman and William were in the backfield," said Joe Philbin, the first-year offensive coordinator who joined the staff in '03. "That is a long time. It's a changing of the guard, really in one year. But that's life in the NFL."

    After going only so far in bidding for Green, general manager Ted Thompson watched him sign with Houston. He had the cap room to go after running backs such as Travis Henry, Jamal Lewis, Chris Brown and Dominic Rhodes, not to mention a fullback group headed by Terrelle Smith and Justin Griffith.

    Thompson could have traded for Willis McGahee, and he still could make a blockbuster bid for Kansas City's Larry Johnson.

    If the Packers operate as usual and make no major moves, they'll be trying to make something out of maybe the least imposing depth chart in the league.

    In its summer rankings, Pro Football Weekly rated the Packers' corps better than only one team, Tennessee. Earlier in the week, a personnel director for an AFC team said, "I still don't know what they're going to do at running back."

    It's a fair question, a satisfactory answer to which could hold the key for a successful season.

    "There's a lot of conjecture right now," Philbin said. "The big thing will be how these guys progress in the next five weeks. So to rush to judgment and say, 'Hey, we're loaded,' or to say, 'We have nothing,' I'm not ready to do either one of those things."

    Vernand Morency, a shrewd trade acquisition by Thompson last September, is the front-runner, not just because he was here in '06 but also because his average in 96 rushes was an impressive 4.5 yards.

    At some point, Morency could very well be challenged by rookie Brandon Jackson, a second-round draft choice.

    Morency and Jackson seem almost like the same back. Each entered the league as a third-year junior, each scored 11 on the 50-question Wonderlic intelligence test and each weighs 212 pounds. Morency measured 5 feet 9 5/8 inches at the 2005 combine and Jackson measured 5-9 7/8 at the '07 combine.

    The Packers haven't had a featured back weigh less than 215 since 1992, when 205-pound Vince Workman led them with 631 yards. How a relatively small back will fare in short yardage and in the NFC North late in the season also is guesswork.

    For now, at least, Jackson figures to run a little harder than Morency, who is more than strong enough to break arm tackles. Jackson definitely is faster than Morency, but one personnel director said all four collegiate reports written by his team's scouts listed speed as one of Morency's strengths.

    "Probably the No. 1 thing that catches your attention is his ability to make a move in the hole," Philbin said, referring to Morency. "Unless the first guy's got a real clean shot it's hard for him to take him down. Smart guy. Very serious. Very hard worker."

    Although not used much as a receiver, Morency in the opinion of scouts has typical baseball player's hands, which means they're good (he played center field in the minors for four years). And, said Philbin, "We feel comfortable with his ability to pick up blitzes."

    Jackson didn't emerge until his third season at Nebraska and could need time, time the Packers really don't have.

    "The thing that really impressed us was he keeps his feet in the ground," Philbin said. "Therefore, he's able to change direction, able to keep pretty good balance, able to maybe absorb a hit and not go down right away. He's got good quick feet."

    The unknowns on Jackson include durability and pass blocking.

    Another back with the exact same dimensions, P.J. Pope, almost cracked Chicago's talented depth chart as a rookie. Said Philbin: "We feel he's more of a power type of guy."

    The big back is rookie DeShawn Wynn, a 232-pounder with natural running skills and 4.47-second speed at 40 yards. But he ran too often like a little guy at Florida, which won't be tolerated in the pros.

    The Packers surely would like better than Herron, whose 40 time of 4.67 pales in comparison to the others. His hope would be that some seasoning and some savvy might come in handy at cut-down time.

    At fullback, holdover Brandon Miree could be pushed by rookies Ryan Powdrell, Korey Hall and Corey White, all of them are trying to make transitions from other positions. The fullback that Miree replaced last September, Vonta Leach, now is entrenched as the starter in Houston.

    "It's still an attitude position . . . you want a tough guy," Philbin said. "We have to take a really, really hard look at these guys. 'EB' (running backs coach Edgar Bennett) is going to be teaching his butt off in camp."

    Miree is more athletic than the aging Henderson. As a blocker, he's more finesse than collision. The Packers want him to be more physical.

    Powdrell, who played all but two games at linebacker for Southern California, has ideal size, can run and catch. Hall, strictly a linebacker at Boise State, would become a strong candidate to lead the Packers' lowly special teams if he learns to lower his pads and block people.

    White was a running back at Alabama-Birmingham and will practice some there in camp, but at 239 also will get a long audition at fullback.

    "Guys know there's a lot of opportunity out there waiting for somebody to grab it," said Philbin said. "Part of the job of coaching is developing players. I was kidding Mike McCarthy. We're going to need a bunch of 9-on-7 because we have a lot of guys to find out about."
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

  • #2
    Breakdown?? We don't want to use that word with the Packer backfield.

    I'm confident Hall will make the team. He may not beat out Miree.

    Wynn can't break tackles perhaps he is a practice squad guy. Herron isn't fast enough or strong enough. I think Pope has a good chance of being the #3 RB. Jackson is the best RB. Morency will make the team.

    An RB will be drafted in the first half of the Packers 2008 draft.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: RB Breakdown

      Originally posted by Bretsky
      Position-by-position: Running backs
      Posted: July 24, 2007
      On the Packers

      Bob McGinn
      E-MAIL

      Green Bay -

      If the Packers operate as usual and make no major moves, they'll be trying to make something out of maybe the least imposing depth chart in the league.

      In its summer rankings, Pro Football Weekly rated the Packers' corps better than only one team, Tennessee. Earlier in the week, a personnel director for an AFC team said, "I still don't know what they're going to do at running back."
      "... least imposing depth chart in the league." That pretty much sums up our RB situation. I could tell that scout what "they're going to do at RB"... nothing.

      The Packers are so far away from contending that it really doesn't matter what they do this year.

      In a perfect world I'd like to see Wynn come out of nowhere and play like a bonafide #1 back, with Jackson as the backup, and Morency flipping burgers. However, Wynn will likely sulk his way right off the roster b/4 the season even starts, and since the coaching staff thinks Morency is the second coming of Barry Sanders, Walter Peyton, and Gale Sayers all rolled into one, it's likely that Morency will just be handed the job.

      I would be happy if Jackson overtakes Morency by the 3rd or 4th game, and proves to be durable. I haven't seen much of him on film, but he appears to run harder and with more toughness than Morency - granted that's not hard to do, as Morency runs like a ballarina.

      All in all, ranking them 31st out of 32 is pretty optimistic... pass the Kool-Aid!!!
      wist

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: RB Breakdown

        Originally posted by wist43
        Originally posted by Bretsky
        Position-by-position: Running backs
        Posted: July 24, 2007
        On the Packers

        Bob McGinn
        E-MAIL

        Green Bay -

        If the Packers operate as usual and make no major moves, they'll be trying to make something out of maybe the least imposing depth chart in the league.

        In its summer rankings, Pro Football Weekly rated the Packers' corps better than only one team, Tennessee. Earlier in the week, a personnel director for an AFC team said, "I still don't know what they're going to do at running back."
        "... least imposing depth chart in the league." That pretty much sums up our RB situation. I could tell that scout what "they're going to do at RB"... nothing.

        The Packers are so far away from contending that it really doesn't matter what they do this year.

        In a perfect world I'd like to see Wynn come out of nowhere and play like a bonafide #1 back, with Jackson as the backup, and Morency flipping burgers. However, Wynn will likely sulk his way right off the roster b/4 the season even starts, and since the coaching staff thinks Morency is the second coming of Barry Sanders, Walter Peyton, and Gale Sayers all rolled into one, it's likely that Morency will just be handed the job.

        I would be happy if Jackson overtakes Morency by the 3rd or 4th game, and proves to be durable. I haven't seen much of him on film, but he appears to run harder and with more toughness than Morency - granted that's not hard to do, as Morency runs like a ballarina.

        All in all, ranking them 31st out of 32 is pretty optimistic... pass the Kool-Aid!!!
        I'm curious what you think of undrafted Willie Parker? He played for UNC in college and didnt exactly light it up there (181 yards on 48 carries in his senior year) so I'm not buying anything about Jackson and his JR year at Nebraska.

        Parker is 5'10 209 and put up 598 carries in the last 2 years. He's far from a big and powerful back, but he gets it done. He's about exactly the same size as Jackson, but he does have a top end gear that I'm not sure Jackson has. He does seem to be able to carry the load on a power running team.

        The Steelers also have Closet McPooperson and Verron Hayes as their backups. Not exactly HoF material.
        Originally posted by 3irty1
        This is museum quality stupidity.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: RB Breakdown

          Originally posted by wist43
          since the coaching staff thinks Morency is the second coming of Barry Sanders, Walter Peyton, and Gale Sayers all rolled into one, it's likely that Morency will just be handed the job ....Morency runs like a ballarina.
          I just don't understand this attitude. Morency showed good quickness, averaged 4.6 yards per carry in his first NFL opportunities. He's not some high draft pick who is just handed a job.

          Not every back carries tacklers for extra yardage. You mention Sayers and Sanders - they ran like ballerinas too.

          Comment


          • #6
            I like Parker, and while he's not the biggest guy in the world, he does run pretty tough, and runs behind a very tough and physical line - something the Packers don't have. Parker's lack of size will likely affect his durability and longevity at some point I would imagine, but there are exceptions to the rule - Warrick Dunn comes to mind.

            That said, just b/c a guy is listed at a given ht/wt, doesn't mean he plays to those measurables. Maurice Jones-Drew is what??? 5'7", 212lbs??? He's a mini-tank; very tough. Body type matters in terms of running style and durability. Morency runs like a wimp... doesn't matter how much weight he may have gained in the offseason, he's a slasher, and a good change of pace back, but he's simply not physical enough to be an every down back, IMO.

            Don't see Morency as being able to get the job done long term... I have more hope for Jackson; and, as I said, hope he takes over the #1 spot w/in the first few games of the season.
            wist

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: RB Breakdown

              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
              Originally posted by wist43
              since the coaching staff thinks Morency is the second coming of Barry Sanders, Walter Peyton, and Gale Sayers all rolled into one, it's likely that Morency will just be handed the job ....Morency runs like a ballarina.
              I just don't understand this attitude. Morency showed good quickness, averaged 4.6 yards per carry in his first NFL opportunities. He's not some high draft pick who is just handed a job.

              Not every back carries tacklers for extra yardage. You mention Sayers and Sanders - they ran like ballerinas too.
              Playing devil's advocate, Morency had one, maybe two games in which he racked up stats to give him that 4.5 yards per carry against sub par defenses. He also looked completely lost at times, such as the Rams game I attented.

              I'll give the mighty Vern a shot, but I'd agree GB RB core is in the bottom five in football on paper.
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: RB Breakdown

                Originally posted by Zool
                Originally posted by wist43
                Originally posted by Bretsky
                Position-by-position: Running backs
                Posted: July 24, 2007
                On the Packers

                Bob McGinn
                E-MAIL

                Green Bay -

                If the Packers operate as usual and make no major moves, they'll be trying to make something out of maybe the least imposing depth chart in the league.

                In its summer rankings, Pro Football Weekly rated the Packers' corps better than only one team, Tennessee. Earlier in the week, a personnel director for an AFC team said, "I still don't know what they're going to do at running back."
                "... least imposing depth chart in the league." That pretty much sums up our RB situation. I could tell that scout what "they're going to do at RB"... nothing.

                The Packers are so far away from contending that it really doesn't matter what they do this year.

                In a perfect world I'd like to see Wynn come out of nowhere and play like a bonafide #1 back, with Jackson as the backup, and Morency flipping burgers. However, Wynn will likely sulk his way right off the roster b/4 the season even starts, and since the coaching staff thinks Morency is the second coming of Barry Sanders, Walter Peyton, and Gale Sayers all rolled into one, it's likely that Morency will just be handed the job.

                I would be happy if Jackson overtakes Morency by the 3rd or 4th game, and proves to be durable. I haven't seen much of him on film, but he appears to run harder and with more toughness than Morency - granted that's not hard to do, as Morency runs like a ballarina.

                All in all, ranking them 31st out of 32 is pretty optimistic... pass the Kool-Aid!!!
                I'm curious what you think of undrafted Willie Parker? He played for UNC in college and didnt exactly light it up there (181 yards on 48 carries in his senior year) so I'm not buying anything about Jackson and his JR year at Nebraska.

                Parker is 5'10 209 and put up 598 carries in the last 2 years. He's far from a big and powerful back, but he gets it done. He's about exactly the same size as Jackson, but he does have a top end gear that I'm not sure Jackson has. He does seem to be able to carry the load on a power running team.

                The Steelers also have Closet McPooperson and Verron Hayes as their backups. Not exactly HoF material.

                Maybe I'm wrong here, but I think Parker has absoulute breakaway speed that Morency does not have. And he has a tough experienced OL to run behind in a power system. We might need a tougher back as we do not yet have that.
                TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                Comment


                • #9
                  RB is the one position where rookies can shine. In all honesty, I'm not that worried about the RB position.

                  My concerns boil down to:
                  1) Finding WRs for subpackages.
                  2) Improvement in the interior OL.
                  3) Finding anyone serviceable at TE.
                  4) Finding a starting safety to replace Manuel.
                  5) The starting corners staying healthy.
                  6) Finding CBs for subpackages.
                  7) Getting better special teams play overall.

                  Of these, #3, #5, and #7 are the ones that I'm most worried about. At WR, CB and S, we have some young players that could surprise. I think you'll see improvement in the OL.
                  "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                    RB is the one position where rookies can shine. In all honesty, I'm not that worried about the RB position.

                    My concerns boil down to:
                    1) Finding WRs for subpackages.
                    2) Improvement in the interior OL.
                    3) Finding anyone serviceable at TE.
                    4) Finding a starting safety to replace Manuel.
                    5) The starting corners staying healthy.
                    6) Finding CBs for subpackages.
                    7) Getting better special teams play overall.

                    Of these, #3, #5, and #7 are the ones that I'm most worried about. At WR, CB and S, we have some young players that could surprise. I think you'll see improvement in the OL.

                    I'd add #1 to my list of extreme concerns and concur with the rest of your list.

                    If we can't find a solid #3 then those two problems together bode poorly for the offense.
                    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It will all come down to how the OL plays. If they can be better blockers, then our RB by committee should do the job just fine. If we don't have the HR threat, fine. I'm happy if both Morency and Jackson avg about 4.25 yds/carry.
                      All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                        RB is the one position where rookies can shine. In all honesty, I'm not that worried about the RB position.

                        My concerns boil down to:
                        1) Finding WRs for subpackages.
                        2) Improvement in the interior OL.
                        3) Finding anyone serviceable at TE.
                        4) Finding a starting safety to replace Manuel.
                        5) The starting corners staying healthy.
                        6) Finding CBs for subpackages.
                        7) Getting better special teams play overall.

                        Of these, #3, #5, and #7 are the ones that I'm most worried about. At WR, CB and S, we have some young players that could surprise. I think you'll see improvement in the OL.
                        Good list Harv... there's more of course; but it serves to show just how many holes/weaknesses/questions the Packers have going into this season.

                        So many things have to work out perfectly for the Packers to be competitive - is it any wonder national writers look at the Packers and see a team that has little chance of winning.
                        wist

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: RB Breakdown

                          Originally posted by Bretsky
                          Originally posted by Zool
                          Originally posted by wist43
                          Originally posted by Bretsky
                          Position-by-position: Running backs
                          Posted: July 24, 2007
                          On the Packers

                          Bob McGinn
                          E-MAIL

                          Green Bay -

                          If the Packers operate as usual and make no major moves, they'll be trying to make something out of maybe the least imposing depth chart in the league.

                          In its summer rankings, Pro Football Weekly rated the Packers' corps better than only one team, Tennessee. Earlier in the week, a personnel director for an AFC team said, "I still don't know what they're going to do at running back."
                          "... least imposing depth chart in the league." That pretty much sums up our RB situation. I could tell that scout what "they're going to do at RB"... nothing.

                          The Packers are so far away from contending that it really doesn't matter what they do this year.

                          In a perfect world I'd like to see Wynn come out of nowhere and play like a bonafide #1 back, with Jackson as the backup, and Morency flipping burgers. However, Wynn will likely sulk his way right off the roster b/4 the season even starts, and since the coaching staff thinks Morency is the second coming of Barry Sanders, Walter Peyton, and Gale Sayers all rolled into one, it's likely that Morency will just be handed the job.

                          I would be happy if Jackson overtakes Morency by the 3rd or 4th game, and proves to be durable. I haven't seen much of him on film, but he appears to run harder and with more toughness than Morency - granted that's not hard to do, as Morency runs like a ballarina.

                          All in all, ranking them 31st out of 32 is pretty optimistic... pass the Kool-Aid!!!
                          I'm curious what you think of undrafted Willie Parker? He played for UNC in college and didnt exactly light it up there (181 yards on 48 carries in his senior year) so I'm not buying anything about Jackson and his JR year at Nebraska.

                          Parker is 5'10 209 and put up 598 carries in the last 2 years. He's far from a big and powerful back, but he gets it done. He's about exactly the same size as Jackson, but he does have a top end gear that I'm not sure Jackson has. He does seem to be able to carry the load on a power running team.

                          The Steelers also have Closet McPooperson and Verron Hayes as their backups. Not exactly HoF material.

                          Maybe I'm wrong here, but I think Parker has absoulute breakaway speed that Morency does not have. And he has a tough experienced OL to run behind in a power system. We might need a tougher back as we do not yet have that.
                          Im about 10% sold that Morency is going to even start this year. If Jackson gets into camp on time, I think he'll end up starting.

                          I know Parker is fast, I said he has the top gear that Jackson doesnt have, but he carried the ball a ton the last 2 years without wearing down.

                          Summary, I hope that Jackson looks as good on the field as he does in the youtube clips. He wont outrun everyone but i'll take a solid 4.5ypc.
                          Originally posted by 3irty1
                          This is museum quality stupidity.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Bretsky
                            Maybe I'm wrong here, but I think Parker has absoulute breakaway speed that Morency does not have. And he has a tough experienced OL to run behind in a power system. We might need a tougher back as we do not yet have that.
                            Parker is one of the fastest RBs in the league. Parker doesn't have a lot of power, and he's smaller than Morency. Tomlin wants to spell Parker more than Cowher--which is probably smart. Morency isn't going to be Parker, but his speed is solid. I think there's a good chance that the Packers will be fine at RB. Most of the success or failure of the running game will depend on how much the OL improves.
                            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by wist43
                              Good list Harv... there's more of course; but it serves to show just how many holes/weaknesses/questions the Packers have going into this season.
                              Fortunately, many of the teams in the NFC have a similar list.
                              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X