Scout.com NFC North QB rankings

[Scott Campbell]

Hey, I'm interested to see how this race plays out.

Well there you go playing the race card.

[ny10804]

Time to put some pressure on Manning.

EDIT - wrong thread.


Brett's looking really good today. Definitely #1.

[The Shadow]

Give me a T!
Give me a T!
Give me a T!

What's that spell?

Disaster...

I only hope we have 14 more such disasters in the regular season & then a few more disasters in the playoffs.

[Scott Campbell]

Our week 1 standings
1a. Favre 1-0 (he gets 1a because his win put him at the top of the list for career wins by a QB with 148)
1b. Kitna 1-0
1c. Jackson 1-0 (career win #1)
4. Grossman 0-1

Teams win games not individual guys. NFL uses a formula to measure QB's and that's what I'll use in this space.


Our week 1 standings
1. Kitna 102.7
2. Jackson 75.1
3. Favre 58.2
4. Grossman 53.7

So how is that working out for you after week 2?

[Rastak]

Our week 1 standings
1a. Favre 1-0 (he gets 1a because his win put him at the top of the list for career wins by a QB with 148)
1b. Kitna 1-0
1c. Jackson 1-0 (career win #1)
4. Grossman 0-1

Teams win games not individual guys. NFL uses a formula to measure QB's and that's what I'll use in this space.


Our week 1 standings
1. Kitna 102.7
2. Jackson 75.1
3. Favre 58.2
4. Grossman 53.7

So how is that working out for you after week 2?

The same as week one Scott, I don't whine and cry based on the numbers. I report 'em. If the numbers don't go my way I don't make excuses.
There isn't even a "my way" It is what it is.


By the way, did I ever give any indication I'd only post 'em if they went a certain way?

[Willard]

Our week 1 standings
1a. Favre 1-0 (he gets 1a because his win put him at the top of the list for career wins by a QB with 148)
1b. Kitna 1-0
1c. Jackson 1-0 (career win #1)
4. Grossman 0-1

Teams win games not individual guys. NFL uses a formula to measure QB's and that's what I'll use in this space.


Our week 1 standings
1. Kitna 102.7
2. Jackson 75.1
3. Favre 58.2
4. Grossman 53.7

So how is that working out for you after week 2?

The same as week one Scott, I don't whine and cry based on the numbers. I report 'em. If the numbers don't go my way I don't make excuses.
There isn't even a "my way" It is what it is.


By the way, did I ever give any indication I'd only post 'em if they went a certain way?

Week2 QB Ratings:
Favre 112.4
Kitna 86
Grossman 56
Jackson 26.4

[Scott Campbell]

The same as week one Scott, I don't whine and cry based on the numbers. I report 'em. If the numbers don't go my way I don't make excuses.

Geez, where's the fun in that?

[Rastak]

Our week 1 standings
1a. Favre 1-0 (he gets 1a because his win put him at the top of the list for career wins by a QB with 148)
1b. Kitna 1-0
1c. Jackson 1-0 (career win #1)
4. Grossman 0-1

Teams win games not individual guys. NFL uses a formula to measure QB's and that's what I'll use in this space.


Our week 1 standings
1. Kitna 102.7
2. Jackson 75.1
3. Favre 58.2
4. Grossman 53.7

So how is that working out for you after week 2?

The same as week one Scott, I don't whine and cry based on the numbers. I report 'em. If the numbers don't go my way I don't make excuses.
There isn't even a "my way" It is what it is.


By the way, did I ever give any indication I'd only post 'em if they went a certain way?

Week2 QB Ratings:
Favre 112.4
Kitna 86
Grossman 56
Jackson 26.4

Is that cumulative? That's what we are tracking here.

[Willard]

Our week 1 standings
1a. Favre 1-0 (he gets 1a because his win put him at the top of the list for career wins by a QB with 148)
1b. Kitna 1-0
1c. Jackson 1-0 (career win #1)
4. Grossman 0-1

Teams win games not individual guys. NFL uses a formula to measure QB's and that's what I'll use in this space.


Our week 1 standings
1. Kitna 102.7
2. Jackson 75.1
3. Favre 58.2
4. Grossman 53.7

So how is that working out for you after week 2?

The same as week one Scott, I don't whine and cry based on the numbers. I report 'em. If the numbers don't go my way I don't make excuses.
There isn't even a "my way" It is what it is.


By the way, did I ever give any indication I'd only post 'em if they went a certain way?

Week2 QB Ratings:
Favre 112.4
Kitna 86
Grossman 56
Jackson 26.4

Is that cumulative? That's what we are tracking here.

No. My math skills aren't that good, and I don't think cumulative is posted yet. I grabbed today's numbers from Fox NFL. I predict Grossman has a cumulative 55 though, and a gold star for consistency.

[Zool]

Kitna 94.7
Favre 84
Grossman 55.1
Jackson 40

[Rastak]

Kitna 94.7
Favre 84
Grossman 55.1
Jackson 40

I told you guys Favre would move up....didn't expect Jackson to melt down that badly. He was pretty brutal. Grossman is maintaining his average.

[Rastak]

Week 3 standings

1. Kitna 97
2. Favre 93.4
3. Grossman 45.2
4 Jackson 40.0

slight disparity from the top two to the bottom two......

[Zool]

Week 3 standings

1. Kitna 97
2. Favre 93.4
3. Grossman 45.2
4 Jackson 40.0

slight disparity from the top two to the bottom two......

At least Jackson didnt move down.

Holcomb was a 68.3, and looked better than Jackson in the limited action I saw. He's still a career backup though.

[MadScientist]

Week 3 standings

1. Kitna 97
2. Favre 93.4
3. Grossman 45.2
4 Jackson 40.0

slight disparity from the top two to the bottom two......

At least Jackson didnt move down.

Holcomb was a 68.3, and looked better than Jackson in the limited action I saw. He's still a career backup though.

Looks like the bottom two will be locked in for a while, unless Jackson is out more for injury than suckiness. 68.3 does sound like career backup material.

[Rastak]

Week 4 shows us.....

1. Kitna 105.6 (not friggen bad)
2. Favre 97.3 (man, he played well last week)
3. Holcomb 70.9 (current starter qualifies, should be gone next week)
4. Grossman 45.2 (ouch.....Griese should show up here soon)

Dishonorable mention

5. Jackson 40.0 (Only played two games but looked bad in the second one)