Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rookie RB Jackson shows ability
Collapse
X
-
That's what some experts have opined. Personally, I think they took him because they thought he was the best RB available. Of course, scheme plays a part. His strengths as an RB play to the strengths of the one-cut system. I doubt they took him over guys that had much more highly rated players because he played in a WCO at Nebraska. Lots of players play in a similar offense in college. It's not like most teams are running the Bone.Originally posted by BrohmIf I remember correctly they took Jackson ahead of some other RB's in the draft because of his experience in the zone blocking/WCO scheme used at Nebraska
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Harv, I agree. I do think Thompson thought he was the best remaining RB available. I question how much Thompson thought he'd contribute in 2007 though.
I know there are a lot of us, myself included, who think he's the "best hope" for a decent running game in 2007, but I really question whether or not that "hope" is realistic. Green didn't get good until his 3rd or 4th season, though he showed "flashes" early on.
Jackson is likely not destined for stardom in 2007, and the Packers are not likely destined for huge success at RB in 2007 either, unless that comes from "back by committee".
This guy needs time to get his feet wet in the NFL game, and we need to realize that.... That's one of the reasons why I've tempered my expectations in 2007...
Comment
-
I have a feeling that Green was always good. He just fumbled more than Holmgren wanted, and he had the likes of Ricky Watters in front of him. I don't think it takes RBs long to get good. That's one position, more than others, where a guy has the ability to run at the pro level or he doesn't."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersI have a feeling that Green was always good. He just fumbled more than Holmgren wanted, and he had the likes of Ricky Watters in front of him. I don't think it takes RBs long to get good. That's one position, more than others, where a guy has the ability to run at the pro level or he doesn't.
That's very true. Much easier for a back than a WR for instance. However, the one thing backs do have to learn is the more complicated blitz pickup schemes and pass blocking in general. I know back when Tice was coaching the Vikings that was always his reservation on young backs. Until they can block, they don't play.
Comment
-
Did AP do much blocking at OU? How has his blocking looked so far?Originally posted by RastakOriginally posted by HarveyWallbangersI have a feeling that Green was always good. He just fumbled more than Holmgren wanted, and he had the likes of Ricky Watters in front of him. I don't think it takes RBs long to get good. That's one position, more than others, where a guy has the ability to run at the pro level or he doesn't.
That's very true. Much easier for a back than a WR for instance. However, the one thing backs do have to learn is the more complicated blitz pickup schemes and pass blocking in general. I know back when Tice was coaching the Vikings that was always his reservation on young backs. Until they can block, they don't play.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott CampbellDid AP do much blocking at OU? How has his blocking looked so far?Originally posted by RastakOriginally posted by HarveyWallbangersI have a feeling that Green was always good. He just fumbled more than Holmgren wanted, and he had the likes of Ricky Watters in front of him. I don't think it takes RBs long to get good. That's one position, more than others, where a guy has the ability to run at the pro level or he doesn't.
That's very true. Much easier for a back than a WR for instance. However, the one thing backs do have to learn is the more complicated blitz pickup schemes and pass blocking in general. I know back when Tice was coaching the Vikings that was always his reservation on young backs. Until they can block, they don't play.
Up and down. On one play I read about, the defense overloaded the line and he picked up nobody because he froze with two guys breaking though. Coaches yelled "pick up the blindside guy always, don't hesitate" or something to that effect. I think most rookie backs have this problem. I'm sure some learn faster than others. We'll find out which is which during August I guess.
Comment



Comment