Rogers looked awesome! Lets trade him!

[cheesner]

Re: Rodgers

So your saying his good game didn't mean anything?. Considering all the people on this forum who have called Rodgers a BUST since the moment he was drafted, I believe this performance means a lot.

But the story has gone from he is a bust to now 'He is only doing good in order to spite Brett Favre.'

[the_idle_threat]

Got it. I`ll keep that in mind. Thanks,.......Oh yea Packers won last night!!!!! :P :P :P :P

That is a hilarious avatar!

[PackerBlues]

All these years, and here I thought that pre-season games were used to bring the young guys up to speed. To see if they had what it took to be starters when the meaningful games started with the regular season. To decide who to keep and who to cut. Some of you douche bags may find this hard to believe, but some people don't even watch pre-season games. To some people, watching a pre-season game is about as important as watching the team practice. Some people will go so far as to say that pre-season games are completely meaningless. Anyone remember off the top of there head who the last team was that we beat in the pre-season before the steelers? I sure as hell don't. Anyone remember which teams went unbeaten in the pre-season last year? If you do, you must be a special kind of nerd. The off-season is to damn long, and I understand how badly people want to get back to the meaningful regular season games. But when you take into consideration that Brett Favre has 16 seasons under his belt as the starting QB for the GB Packers, don't go expecting everyone else to jump up and down with joy and act like a bunch of giddy little bitches, just because during the first game of his 3rd pre-season, Aaron Rogers finally looked good. Some of you geeks act like its the second coming of Brett Favre. Ha Ha.........losers!

[swede]

All these years...I...used...douche bags...like a...giddy little bitch...

It's okay. We Packer fans have a big tent and everyone is welcome!

[Zool]

All these years, and here I thought that pre-season games were used to bring the young guys up to speed. To see if they had what it took to be starters when the meaningful games started with the regular season. To decide who to keep and who to cut. Some of you douche bags may find this hard to believe, but some people don't even watch pre-season games. To some people, watching a pre-season game is about as important as watching the team practice. Some people will go so far as to say that pre-season games are completely meaningless. Anyone remember off the top of there head who the last team was that we beat in the pre-season before the steelers? I sure as hell don't. Anyone remember which teams went unbeaten in the pre-season last year? If you do, you must be a special kind of nerd. The off-season is to damn long, and I understand how badly people want to get back to the meaningful regular season games. But when you take into consideration that Brett Favre has 16 seasons under his belt as the starting QB for the GB Packers, don't go expecting everyone else to jump up and down with joy and act like a bunch of giddy little bitches, just because during the first game of his 3rd pre-season, Aaron Rogers finally looked good. Some of you geeks act like its the second coming of Brett Favre. Ha Ha.........losers!

Does it always rain on your planet?

[PaCkFan_n_MD]

All these years, and here I thought that pre-season games were used to bring the young guys up to speed. To see if they had what it took to be starters when the meaningful games started with the regular season. To decide who to keep and who to cut. Some of you douche bags may find this hard to believe, but some people don't even watch pre-season games. To some people, watching a pre-season game is about as important as watching the team practice. Some people will go so far as to say that pre-season games are completely meaningless. Anyone remember off the top of there head who the last team was that we beat in the pre-season before the steelers? I sure as hell don't. Anyone remember which teams went unbeaten in the pre-season last year? If you do, you must be a special kind of nerd. The off-season is to damn long, and I understand how badly people want to get back to the meaningful regular season games. But when you take into consideration that Brett Favre has 16 seasons under his belt as the starting QB for the GB Packers, don't go expecting everyone else to jump up and down with joy and act like a bunch of giddy little bitches, just because during the first game of his 3rd pre-season, Aaron Rogers finally looked good. Some of you geeks act like its the second coming of Brett Favre. Ha Ha.........losers!

I don't think anyone on this forum thinks A-Rod is the second coming of Brett Favre nor did they get too worked up about one good pre-season game for him. JH started a thread saying he looked good, but it was nothing over the top. The only one getting all worked up is you, calling people douche bags and such. I still don't even know the point you’re trying to make in this thread.

As I said in an earlier post, A-Rod played good, but it means nothing if he can't do it on a consistent basis. I agree that pre-season games don't mean much, but they definitely mean something. If A-Rod went out for four straight games and totally sucked ass you would say that means nothing? I would say that he must not be that good if he can't even play good against backs, wouldn’t you?

[cpk1994]

All these years, and here I thought that pre-season games were used to bring the young guys up to speed. To see if they had what it took to be starters when the meaningful games started with the regular season. To decide who to keep and who to cut. Some of you douche bags may find this hard to believe, but some people don't even watch pre-season games. To some people, watching a pre-season game is about as important as watching the team practice. Some people will go so far as to say that pre-season games are completely meaningless. Anyone remember off the top of there head who the last team was that we beat in the pre-season before the steelers? I sure as hell don't. Anyone remember which teams went unbeaten in the pre-season last year? If you do, you must be a special kind of nerd. The off-season is to damn long, and I understand how badly people want to get back to the meaningful regular season games. But when you take into consideration that Brett Favre has 16 seasons under his belt as the starting QB for the GB Packers, don't go expecting everyone else to jump up and down with joy and act like a bunch of giddy little bitches, just because during the first game of his 3rd pre-season, Aaron Rogers finally looked good. Some of you geeks act like its the second coming of Brett Favre. Ha Ha.........losers!

Your TT and ARod hate blinds you from the point. The point is that people believe he was a bust from day one and simply refuse to give him any credit because you can't admit you might be a little wrong about him. Face it, you don't like TT because he drafted ARod, so as long as Arod doesn't improve it justifies your hate. ARod is showing definite improvement and it isstarting to tear your guts out because their is a possibity that TT is right and you are wrong. Now that people are excited about ARod's performance you have to act like a whiny little school girl and call people losers. I guess the saying about "It takes one to know one" rings true in your case.

[Zool]

He actually called some people douche bags. Were I one of the people he was referring to, I might take offense.

[PackerBlues]

A few of you seemed to catch on. Others went straight into attack mode. If you have said that this thread is ridiculous, or a joke, then you were right.
It started with the title of the post: "Rogers looked Awesome! Lets trade him!"
After that, the post started with 3 paragraphs explaining why we shouldn't get excited about Rogers just yet, and a few overall thoughts about what was seen in the game. That was followed by the 4'th paragraph where I started talking shit about Rogers. Nothing all that bad really, if you put yourself in Aaron Rogers shoes, then of coarse he is going to take a shot at Favre's (supposed) weaknesses. And, Yes, he is going to try to show what he thinks he needs to, to try to sway the Coaching staff towards thinking of him as starter material. Anyone who thinks differently is a little naive.

There were roughly 13 replies before TopHat became the first person to respond to anything before that 4th paragraph. Before that, The Shadow started up his cute little sarcastic conspiracy theories, which he kept up throughout the entire thread. Scott Campbell just couldn't get over that 4'th paragraph, lol.....I was just enjoying the thought of driving him nuts. Swede showed us all how much he enjoys playing word games. JH pointed out that punctuation is important, lol. Good job JH.

So, yes, this entire thread has been a joke. It started out with a joke of a title, and a joke of a 4'th paragraph, and it has become what it has become. I didnt notice anyone respond to anything that was said prior to the 4'th paragraph besides TopHat. Say a few bad things about Ted Thompson or Aaron Rogers, and just look at all the fun you can have playing with the Douche bags that go into attack mode. It was a hell of a lot more interesting than reading the BS "fluff" and "feel-good" posts that some were putting out.

So, no, I do not want to see Rogers traded. Yes, Rogers did look much improved over the last two pre-seasons, and yes, I hope that Rogers continues to show improvement over the coarse of the rest of the pre-season games.
As far as our Offense as a whole, I saw a need for improvement all around, and I am looking forward to the end of the pre-season and the start of the regular season.

[Scott Campbell]

Scott Campbell just couldn't get over that 4'th paragraph, lol.....I was just enjoying the thought of driving him nuts.

Uh, yeah. I can't even sleep at night. Whatever shall I do?


Your cute little av goes great with your Mickey Mouse posts.

[SkinBasket]

All these years...I...used...douche bags...like a...giddy little bitch...

It's okay. We Packer fans have a big tent and everyone is welcome!

Very concisely paraphrased swede. Bravo!

[PackerBlues]

Scott Campbell just couldn't get over that 4'th paragraph, lol.....I was just enjoying the thought of driving him nuts.

Uh, yeah. I can't even sleep at night. Whatever shall I do?


Your cute little av goes great with your Mickey Mouse posts.

Ha ha ha, lol. Considering as how this was your 7'th reply to this "Mickey Mouse" thread, I imagine that you will keep coming back to see if anyone congratulated you on your incredibly witty response. If not, then that probably means that its your turn to congratulate somebody elses witty comment. Either way, I hope you have better luck sleeping at night.

[The Shadow]

A few of you seemed to catch on. Others went straight into attack mode. If you have said that this thread is ridiculous, or a joke, then you were right.
It started with the title of the post: "Rogers looked Awesome! Lets trade him!"
After that, the post started with 3 paragraphs explaining why we shouldn't get excited about Rogers just yet, and a few overall thoughts about what was seen in the game. That was followed by the 4'th paragraph where I started talking shit about Rogers. Nothing all that bad really, if you put yourself in Aaron Rogers shoes, then of coarse he is going to take a shot at Favre's (supposed) weaknesses. And, Yes, he is going to try to show what he thinks he needs to, to try to sway the Coaching staff towards thinking of him as starter material. Anyone who thinks differently is a little naive.

There were roughly 13 replies before TopHat became the first person to respond to anything before that 4th paragraph. Before that, The Shadow started up his cute little sarcastic conspiracy theories, which he kept up throughout the entire thread. Scott Campbell just couldn't get over that 4'th paragraph, lol.....I was just enjoying the thought of driving him nuts. Swede showed us all how much he enjoys playing word games. JH pointed out that punctuation is important, lol. Good job JH.

So, yes, this entire thread has been a joke. It started out with a joke of a title, and a joke of a 4'th paragraph, and it has become what it has become. I didnt notice anyone respond to anything that was said prior to the 4'th paragraph besides TopHat. Say a few bad things about Ted Thompson or Aaron Rogers, and just look at all the fun you can have playing with the Douche bags that go into attack mode. It was a hell of a lot more interesting than reading the BS "fluff" and "feel-good" posts that some were putting out.

So, no, I do not want to see Rogers traded. Yes, Rogers did look much improved over the last two pre-seasons, and yes, I hope that Rogers continues to show improvement over the coarse of the rest of the pre-season games.
As far as our Offense as a whole, I saw a need for improvement all around, and I am looking forward to the end of the pre-season and the start of the regular season.

With your newly-introduced frantic backpedaling, perhaps a tryout at cornerback might be in the cards for you.
When the inanities of your positions are pointed out, it quickly becomes "Oh, it was just a joke" .
How convenient!

[woodbuck27]

Re: Rogers looked awesome! Lets trade him!

[quote="TopHat"]

Anyone else notice that Troy Polamalu, the SS for Pitt, got cleanly past our O-line on a blitz? That he could have layed the wood to Favre, but that he appeared to let up at the last second? You can read any number of things from that, I took it that Troy Polamalu is a class act that understands that this was a pre-season game, and that there was no reason to take a chance at injuring a legend with a free shot. It also shows that our O-line still has some work to do before the start of the season....I was just kidding about the trade thing. I doubt we could get anything for Rogers anyway.

I enjoyed a good laugh...PackerBlues & Packnut are hoots...and you are right...TP showed professional courtesy to Bret...the NFL boys know this young line well...it still has work to do to show NFL improvement....it is early. We shall see by the prime time Fox 3rd preseason game. I'll be watching...off on tour.[/quot

TopHat:

On tour? Are you a ROCK STAR?

A poet?

Of course. . . don't respond if your a private person or this is a private matter.

[woodbuck27]

I went through the summary on NFL.COM without knowing the games results.

Comments:

Aaron Rodgers showed up very well.

Let's not knock his performance in the light of. . . he only faced 2nd or 3rd stringers. He needed a boost in confidence and seemed to get that fr. this pre-season game. We even won the game and that's all good for the Packers and coaching staff.

Something positive to build off but it's just pre-season Packer fans. No big deal.

I wanted to see how our running game did and it was as I expected. Not good!

There seems to be a good competition at kicker and punter and that is all good. Let the best man win !

ST's on kick returns and punt returns seems about the same as last season but. . .

hasn't our coverage of kicks and punts shown promise of improvement from this game?

A decent game from WR's James Jones, Ruvell Martin and Holliday (a TD!) seem to me the positive highlights on our 'O'. The running game needs to improve. Noah Herron with 20 yards on 4 carries is solid.Corey White also good.

RB Brandon Jackson got alot of carries. Is that a good thing so early? Too many eggs in one basket.