PFT.com ranks Packers #24. TT gets blasted.

[RashanGary]

I understand the angst. However, I saw/see good things in this team and I want to see them play more than 12 snaps before I jump off a ledge.

[Partial]

Who are we to disagree? HUH! Are you serious????

The President has a much bigger staff then TT and citizens disagree with his thinking all the time. And he has a lot more information to work with then TT has.

We are fans! That's who we are. If you ask me, the "there were no good free agents" arguement is weak. There were guys and TT should have gotten some of them.

Example: Travis Henry looked damn good the other night. He would have been a nice vet. addition.

Disagree isn't the right word. Why be disgusted over not signing a player who sucks? People get all up in arms about TT not signing a free agent yet I rarely see a pro bowler hit the free agent market. If Tony Gonzo was available, I would have said throw the farm at him and make it happen. I reckon TT would have, too. But for Eric Johnson? This kid defines 1 year wonder and I don't see the point in worrying. He is no better than Lee.

[Partial]

I would much rather see TT trade for a 23-24 year old old with some speed to play tight end. Maybe a dominick byrd or a leonard pope.

[Bretsky]

Re: Thompson

His failure to sign one of the TE free agents or to bring in an experienced RB is a crucial failure. The money was there and obviously better talent than what we have now. RB's who can't pick up a freakin blitz and TE's who are non-existent is'nt my recipe for winning.

How anyone can keep making excuses for doing nothing is just mind-boggling. Oh well, can't wait to see the tone of this board after 4 games and we're ranked near the bottom in points scored. One thing is for certain and that is our D is gonna have a shit-load of pressure on them......

This is just getting old!

Just because the money is there does not mean a player (likely demanding a multiple year contract for their security) is there that is worth spending the money.

TT has a decent staff working for him. If they say Eric Johnson is an injury risk, an adequate at best player, and a waste of money who are we to disagree?

So is you argument that there were no players worth the money to sign

Or is the mantle just to trust ?

[Bretsky]

I understand the angst. However, I saw/see good things in this team and I want to see them play more than 12 snaps before I jump off a ledge.

I see good for the future as well

Everybody knows that I think TT is a solid drafter, and everybody knows I don't think much of him during free agency.

Let the dam games begin; I'm sick of arguing about this shit

[Partial]

Re: Thompson

His failure to sign one of the TE free agents or to bring in an experienced RB is a crucial failure. The money was there and obviously better talent than what we have now. RB's who can't pick up a freakin blitz and TE's who are non-existent is'nt my recipe for winning.

How anyone can keep making excuses for doing nothing is just mind-boggling. Oh well, can't wait to see the tone of this board after 4 games and we're ranked near the bottom in points scored. One thing is for certain and that is our D is gonna have a shit-load of pressure on them......

This is just getting old!

Just because the money is there does not mean a player (likely demanding a multiple year contract for their security) is there that is worth spending the money.

TT has a decent staff working for him. If they say Eric Johnson is an injury risk, an adequate at best player, and a waste of money who are we to disagree?

So is you argument that there were no players worth the money to sign

Or is the mantle just to trust ?

A little of both. There wasn't a tight end worth signing. Travis Henry would have been nice, though. But, oh well. I trust in TT (who trusts in MM) that BJ will turn into a good player.

[Bretsky]

I would much rather see TT trade for a 23-24 year old old with some speed to play tight end. Maybe a dominick byrd or a leonard pope.

Byrd is intriguing; I'm not sure Pope will become available.

Partial, you were pounding the table for TT to go get Adrian Peterson. There is nothing wrong with taking some gambles in the draft or in free agency to fill some holes as well. Nothing wrong with taking gambles.

Some GM's felt players signed to free agent contracts were worth the risk. Maybe you are right and TT did not.

It's just as valid to say they are right as it is to say TT is right.

That's why it's fun to express our own views as well. I don't think we should have complete faith in any of those schmucks

[Bretsky]

Re: Thompson

His failure to sign one of the TE free agents or to bring in an experienced RB is a crucial failure. The money was there and obviously better talent than what we have now. RB's who can't pick up a freakin blitz and TE's who are non-existent is'nt my recipe for winning.

How anyone can keep making excuses for doing nothing is just mind-boggling. Oh well, can't wait to see the tone of this board after 4 games and we're ranked near the bottom in points scored. One thing is for certain and that is our D is gonna have a shit-load of pressure on them......

This is just getting old!

Just because the money is there does not mean a player (likely demanding a multiple year contract for their security) is there that is worth spending the money.

TT has a decent staff working for him. If they say Eric Johnson is an injury risk, an adequate at best player, and a waste of money who are we to disagree?

So is you argument that there were no players worth the money to sign

Or is the mantle just to trust ?

A little of both. There wasn't a tight end worth signing. Travis Henry would have been nice, though. But, oh well. I trust in TT (who trusts in MM) that BJ will turn into a good player.

I don't think I can give TT any more credibility for not siging free agent than the qualified GM's who chose to sign them. That's why I've never embraced the nobody is worth it theme.

There were better receiving TE's than Bubba Franks out there. Maybe they cost a lot, but they were upgrades.

Travis Henry, completely agree with you on that one
Also would have jumped on the Adrian Peterson trade up wagon.
I never embraced it because I didn't think TT had the stones to consider it

[Partial]

I would much rather see TT trade for a 23-24 year old old with some speed to play tight end. Maybe a dominick byrd or a leonard pope.

Byrd is intriguing; I'm not sure Pope will become available.

Partial, you were pounding the table for TT to go get Adrian Peterson. There is nothing wrong with taking some gambles in the draft or in free agency to fill some holes as well. Nothing wrong with taking gambles.

Some GM's felt players signed to free agent contracts were worth the risk. Maybe you are right and TT did not.

It's just as valid to say they are right as it is to say TT is right.

That's why it's fun to express our own views as well. I don't think we should have complete faith in any of those schmucks

It would have been nice to go and get Peterson. I think he'd be better over the next 2-3 years than Harrell and Jackson will be combined. Wish he was a Packer. But we shall see. I think Harrell will be a great player in time. I am not as high on Jackson as others.

Harrell, Jackson and Henry would probably look better than Peterson, though. Should have signed Travis Henry. They could have had him for two years at 4 mil a piece if they acted early. The perfect amount of time to develop Jackson from the #3 spot to the #1 spot.

[superfan]

TT is impossible to get any kind of a read on. Most of the time I think he is simply cheap. But last year prior to the start of the season, I thought we overpaid for Woodson, and I liked the lowball signings over the last couple years of Kenderick Clancy, Ben Taylor, Robert Thomas, Marc Boerigter, Rod Gardner, Marquand Manuel at the time they were made.

Considering Woodson's success and the failings of the cheap guys, one would think that Thompson would lean towards spending more for the better talent.

I assume NFL front offices have a board of free agents and how much they think they are worth, similar to a draft board. If that is true, then Thompson must have had lower values on players then other teams, which is why (almost) nobody was signed. Which goes back to him being cheap.

This is madness. This is the kind of thing that happens to small market MLB teams, and shouldn't happen to an NFL franchise with revenue sharing and salary caps.

I'm on board with the overall strategy of building through the draft and emphasizing defense. And I don't expect to sign a Reggie White each offseason. But FA definitely needs to be used to fill the gaps.

[PackerBlues]

I'm on board with the overall strategy of building through the draft and emphasizing defense. And I don't expect to sign a Reggie White each offseason. But FA definitely needs to be used to fill the gaps.

Its being used to fill the gaps.......just on Defense though. Which when you consider our red zone problems last year, the loss of a TE and our best RB, is just plain weird.

[The Leaper]

Considering Woodson's success and the failings of the cheap guys, one would think that Thompson would lean towards spending more for the better talent.

Potentially, you may be correct. There weren't a lot of high caliber talents available in FA this year, and it appears Thompson has passed on signing marginal talents who really haven't proven to be worth the effort in the past.

I certainly believe there were a few upgrades out there to be had. However, outside of Moss, I didn't see anyone who had the potential to make a major impact on this team in 2007.

Trading up for Peterson is a non-issue. It is EXTREMELY unlikely that Thompson could have even pulled off a deal if he had wanted to. Some of you are really ignorant of draft history and just what it takes to move up that much in the draft. Few, if any, teams in recent draft history have moved up into the top 5 picks of the draft without having multiple first round picks to throw into the mix...or a blue chip player on the roster they could move that others want. We had neither.

All of you whining like babies about TT not going after Peterson look foolish. I could see an argument in favor of going after Lynch, since moving up 4-5 picks was far more likely. But to think we had a chance to land Peterson without giving up most of our draft is nutso...unless you think the Vikings and Saints made out like bandits on their deals for Walker and Williams.