Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Must not get hurt

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Must not get hurt

    I think the Packers could reshuffle things and be OK if they get an injury at most positions. But here are the guys that they really have no adequate replacements for:

    Driver, Wells, Jackson on offense.

    the three linebackers on defense.

  • #2
    I agree with you about Driver--there's just no replacing the guy, but I have the feeling that if Wells went down, we'd see a lot more of Rob Davis. I gotta think he could snap it short as well as long, and Morency will be back soon and they'd make do with RB by committee until Jackson was healed.
    "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by MJZiggy
      have the feeling that if Wells went down, we'd see a lot more of Rob Davis.


      sorry Ziggy. Can Davis still walk? Well I guess so, he is getting on the field somehow for extra points.

      Comment


      • #4
        I've heard he's still putting on some good blocking on kicks--and his snaps are damned accurate. Just cause you can't walk anymore doesn't mean other old farts can't still move...
        "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by MJZiggy
          I agree with you about Driver--there's just no replacing the guy, but I have the feeling that if Wells went down, we'd see a lot more of Rob Davis. I gotta think he could snap it short as well as long, and Morency will be back soon and they'd make do with RB by committee until Jackson was healed.
          Spitz has been practicing at center all summer. The way they have the line set-up they can afford an injury to any one on the right side of the line and Moll can step in. On the left side, they can put the Missouri State guy in at guard and Colledge/Clifton at Tackle, and Spitz or Coston at center. Juice played center all last offseason.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Partial
            Spitz or Coston at center. Juice played center all last offseason.
            I don't know. I just suspect it would be a huge drop-off to those guys and ruin the chemistry of the line. Center is a DAMN hard position. they got to be nimble, quick enough to get out to the linebackers. Not excited about a converted guard.

            Comment


            • #7
              Spitz would start. Coston if both guys got injured. Davis only if it's an absolute emergency. You never want your starters to get injured. I don't think it would be a killer if Wells or Jackson got hurt. Driver and the top two LBs are the most important among the guys you listed. All three have been durable, so that's encouraging. There aren't any teams though who wouldn't be hurt if certain individuals got injured.
              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

              Comment


              • #8
                Losing Jackson right now would hurt big time. Morency isn't even practicing yet.
                I can't run no more
                With that lawless crowd
                While the killers in high places
                Say their prayers out loud
                But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                A thundercloud
                They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                Comment


                • #9
                  Injuries to Harris, Woodson, or Collins would result in a steep dropoff to their respective backups.
                  "My problems with him are his vision and tendency to dance instead of pounding a hole." - Harvey Wallbangers

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by superfan
                    Injuries to Harris, Woodson, or Collins would result in a steep dropoff to their respective backups.
                    with just ONE of those guys gone, I can see the packers filling in with Bush, Blackmon and be OK. Is Collins MUCH better than Bigby & Manuel?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Joemailman
                      Losing Jackson right now would hurt big time. Morency isn't even practicing yet.
                      Well, its only been about 2.5-3 weeks. He'll be back by the time the season starts. My guess is Jackson is the starter by then, though. That is probably better anyway. Morency is a great chance-of-pace/burst back. He'll come in and shake and bake away for big yards. My guess is he'll do about 65% of the work 30 to 30. BJack is stronger and will take the 30 to endzone role.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        they are likely gonna need BOTH Morency & Jackson.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                          Is Collins MUCH better than Bigby & Manuel?
                          Yes. At least I think he is.

                          Downgrading from Harris or Woodson to Blackmon or Bush is bad enough, but it also has a ripple effect to the nickel and dime. Bush has had his moments and I am beginning to have some confidence with him in the nickel, but there is no replacing the experience that Harris and Woodson provide. Can Bush get burned, shrug it off, and not let it bother him for the remainder of the game and subsequent games? I don't know, he looks like a pretty emotional player from the little I've seen.

                          I haven't seen enough of Blackmon on defense to be confident that he can be an every down starting cornerback if needed.
                          "My problems with him are his vision and tendency to dance instead of pounding a hole." - Harvey Wallbangers

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I still think Favre would be the hardest by far to replace. Sure Rodgers looks good in preseason - but so did Hasslebeck. I think there would be a huge drop off while Rodgers tried to become a starting caliber QB. I'm not saying he won't be, I'm just predicting that it will take some serious time for him to be a decent starting QB in regular season games.

                            Long term losses of Woodson and/or Harris would be pretty difficult to overcome - the Packers have more depth in the secondary, but the depth lacks experience.
                            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              has this changed a quarter of the way through the season?
                              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X