Ingle Gone

[PaCkFan_n_MD]

All this sarcasm from so many different people; I hope one day it goes away and we can all just debate about the Packers without the clever references

Same here. It seems that people either hate TT and the direction of the team or love TT and the direction of the team. It's hard for people to debate because people are not being sensible and refuse to acknowledge the good with the bad or vice versa. Some here find it hard to believe that you can like certain things and dislike certain things. I for one like TT, but he does have weaknesses IMO.

[Joemailman]

All this sarcasm from so many different people; I hope one day it goes away and we can all just debate about the Packers without the clever references

Gosh, brilliant post B. I'm just jealous because I couldn't say it so well. :P

[Bretsky]

All this sarcasm from so many different people; I hope one day it goes away and we can all just debate about the Packers without the clever references

Merlin makes some here think, and they don't like that.

It may never happen B. But if it were to, the Mod would be a good place to start.

I'm guilty of it; I've tried to get better but I'm surely not one to play the righeous card on this one.

Cheers,
B

[Rastak]

I don't mind some of it. Certain posters here have some pretty funny lines. I just don't like the high school stuff. It's very lame.

[Bretsky]

All this sarcasm from so many different people; I hope one day it goes away and we can all just debate about the Packers without the clever references

Same here. It seems that people either hate TT and the direction of the team or love TT and the direction of the team. It's hard for people to debate because people are not being sensible and refuse to acknowledge the good with the bad or vice versa. Some here find it hard to believe that you can like certain things and dislike certain things. I for one like TT, but he does have weaknesses IMO.

I'm on the other pendelum; slight bias against TT. Solid drafter, I think, but IMO we should have been getting better much faster in this day and era; of course that requires some win now approaches with free agency. Overall he's been good for the Packers so far but I'm an inpatient one

[Rastak]

All this sarcasm from so many different people; I hope one day it goes away and we can all just debate about the Packers without the clever references

Merlin makes some here think, and they don't like that.

It may never happen B. But if it were to, the Mod would be a good place to start.

I'm guilty of it; I've tried to get better but I'm surely not one to play the righeous card on this one.

Cheers,
B

True, you'd need a mandate.

[falco]

I'm on the other pendelum; slight bias against TT. Solid drafter, I think, but IMO we should have been getting better much faster in this day and era; of course that requires some win now approaches with free agency. Overall he's been good for the Packers so far but I'm an inpatient one

I'm in a funny situation. I liked Sherman, and agreed with much of what RG said when he defended him; I'm sure if you look back at some of the threads you'll see that.

However, I also really like what Thompson's done. I've disagreed with some of what he's done, but I also think this year many of his picks and street FA signings are starting to pay dividends.

I won't criticize anyone either way being pro or anti TT. But I ridiculous statements like "Harrell should earn a roster spot this preseason or be cut" need to be called out. I also think the constant sarcasm and persecuted mentality of some (or one) poster is silly.

[Scott Campbell]

I'm guilty of it; I've tried to get better but I'm surely not one to play the righeous card on this one.

Cheers,
B

I think you could play the card. You do a great job, even though you're not wild about Ted.

[Joemailman]

All this sarcasm from so many different people; I hope one day it goes away and we can all just debate about the Packers without the clever references

I actually agree. I've pretty much stopped responding to a couple posters rather than get into a war of words that have nothing to do with football.

[RashanGary]

I'm guilty of it; I've tried to get better but I'm surely not one to play the righeous card on this one.

Cheers,
B

Believe it or not, I'm trying to clean it up too. It's hard though. Sarcasm gets to me. It's my little pet peeve so I try to get even rather than taking the high road.

[Harlan Huckleby]

All this sarcasm from so many different people; I hope one day it goes away and we can all just debate about the Packers without the clever references

It may never happen B. But if it were to, the Mod would be a good place to start.

This reminds me of when I was a little kid, wandering through one of my parents' cocktail parties. The adults would be drinking and talking, using words I didn't understand, laughing at remarks that made no sense.

I have zero idea what people are talking about. What's wrong with sarcasm or clever references? "the Mod would be a good place to start"? What do you want the Mod to do? Or are you gonna do something to the Mod? (i'm for that!)

And what's this talk of a persecuted minority? And what's this rightousness card? Is this a reference to my speech?

Nothing wrong with arguing, fussing or fighting; just keep it above the level of personal insults. Or so I say.

Actually I don't care. I'm just going to wait for the Big People to leave so I can get to the leftover snacks.

[RashanGary]

I should take the blame for 20% of it. I think there is a troll who has multiple names who deserves 50% of it and the other 30% is probably split up between a few others.

[Guiness]

All this sarcasm from so many different people; I hope one day it goes away and we can all just debate about the Packers without the clever references

Oh, fuck off (was that clever?)

:P :P

Anyways, I think this is just
Get a community the size we've grown to, and there's going to be a few

[SkinBasket]

You all feel better now after your group hug you lot of douche-bags?

[Spaulding]

Everybody's entitled to their thoughts on this board and rightfully so, but it's the posts stating something like it's a fact when it's just really an opinion that deserved to be ripped. It's an open invitation and fair game.

Posts should be intented to provide insightful news and/or debate perspectives, not state gibberish and force views upon others or belittle other's posts. That's why the JSO sucks. It's like movie Idiocracy over there.