Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wynn Warned Not to Get Comfortable, Morency Questionable

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by MJZiggy
    Originally posted by Rastak
    What's up with the team threatening Wynn....LOL....that was interesting.
    Wynn came with a history. I think they want to make sure he understands that he is not to get the idea that he can sail along because he got himself a roster spot. They need to keep him hungry if they're gonna get the best out of him.
    Well, if implied threats are needed perhaps they should have just cut him and find someone who is self motivated.....LOL.....

    Comment


    • #17
      Ummmm....he's an RB, and if you take a look at our RB committee right now...
      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

      Comment


      • #18
        Wynn has talent and potential and if you have that you can be warned your whole life.

        Comment


        • #19
          Q: Was the trade a conditional pick, was it a 7th rounder?

          A: It was undisclosed. See you guys say I never trade a pick. I traded a pick for a player.


          Undisclosed as I understand the word means not revealed. The definition of undisclosed wouldn't mean it is also conditional. It could be a conditional undisclosed pick but they never said that and that is what TT was trying to clarify.

          It's pretty consistant with the veil of secrecy thing that Ted does over there. Maybe he doesn't want anyone to know just how high of a pick he gave up so nobody has any leverage power on him for other RB's this week and heading into the season. It's just a way of not letting anyone know what he gave up, it doesn't mean that it's conditional though.
          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by JustinHarrell
            Q: Was the trade a conditional pick, was it a 7th rounder?

            A: It was undisclosed. See you guys say I never trade a pick. I traded a pick for a player.


            Undisclosed as I understand the word means not revealed. The definition of undisclosed wouldn't mean it is also conditional. It could be a conditional undisclosed pick but they never said that and that is what TT was trying to clarify.

            It's pretty consistant with the veil of secrecy thing that Ted does over there. Maybe he doesn't want anyone to know just how high of a pick he gave up so nobody has any leverage power on him for other RB's this week and heading into the season. It's just a way of not letting anyone know what he gave up, it doesn't mean that it's conditional though.

            I think people are going to find out.....LOL....what's the nig secret?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Rastak
              I think people are going to find out.....LOL....what's the nig secret?
              Ras, watch yourselfj! That talk belongs on the KKK board.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by vince
                Originally posted by Rastak
                I think people are going to find out.....LOL....what's the nig secret?
                Ras, watch yourselfj! That talk belongs on the KKK board.

                Damn laptop keyboard......BIG secret.....big........

                anyway, nfl.com just calls it a future draft pick. Doesn't say conditional.

                Comment


                • #23
                  People won't find out for a while and by the time the do they won't be able to get a feel for what TT is willing to give up for a RB.

                  Who knows why the secrecy. It's the way the do buisness over there. Denver and NE are the same way. These guys are paranoid.
                  Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Rastak
                    Originally posted by vince
                    Originally posted by Rastak
                    I think people are going to find out.....LOL....what's the nig secret?
                    Ras, watch yourselfj! That talk belongs on the KKK board.

                    Damn laptop keyboard......BIG secret.....big........

                    anyway, nfl.com just calls it a future draft pick. Doesn't say conditional.
                    You're right that - unless the pick is conditional - there is no good reason not to disclose it, as it will come out eventually anyway. My guess is that the writer is mistaken.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by vince
                      You're right that - unless the pick is conditional - there is no good reason not to disclose it, as it will come out eventually anyway. My guess is that the writer is mistaken.
                      My guess is that TT is just a secretive guy and it really is a pick, just not one that he's willing to share until he absolutely has to.
                      Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                      Comment


                      • #26



                        These guys say it's a 6th. I wouldn't be at all suprised if this is accurate.
                        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          That's corroborated by this article...


                          The Packers had offered Rayner to the Giants in the Saturday trade that brought running back Ryan Grant to Green Bay. Instead, the Giants wanted a draft pick, which turned out to be a sixth-round pick that contained no conditions on Grant being on the roster for any certain length of time.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Makes sense. It would jive perfectly with the undisclosed title and contridict the condition title which is exactly what was said after the trade. No suprised, just some confusion because we're not used to seeing the undiclosed title with a pick.
                            Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              As usual, the information comes out - which is why I don't know why Ted wouldn't just disclose it and move on.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I was just reading through some Giants forums. They thought the guy was a good running back. Some guys were pissed that he was traded. Nobody said he sucked. It was pretty universal that he was good. Similar to the Carolina vibes that we got from Jarrett Bush last year. Also, TT giving up a 6th gives me a little optimism. That is like another team giving up a 4th and Sherman giving up a 2nd.
                                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X