Could be down to 1 TE on Sun

[Lurker64]

Can we not fight in the 1 TE thread? There's plenty of less relevant threads you guys can fight in.

[Packnut]

Re: BS

Look I know I made you look foolish over the Manuel thing just to name one, but let it go. If you wanna start, bring it.

Yeah, that's what I thought.........

[Merlin]

We don't need another TE as long as the other 52 men on the roster are the BPA's. Nice team management.

[rpiotr01]

Any way we can put together a trade package for Tony Gonzalez? We have plenty of space to absorb his new contract, and it makes no sense at all for him to stay with KC, they're not going to do anything for the next year or so.

Just for sh*ts and giggles, what would it take, Corey Williams and a third?

I know Carl Peterson is a maniac, I know he would have wanted a 1st rounder for Larry Johnson, but Gonzalez is past his prime, if only by a year or so, but still on the downside. He's not the best of the best, a Gates or Crumpler, but he's definitely top of the second tier.

[woodbuck27]

Let's say the Pack go 10-6 and make the playoffs this year. Will you edit the sig to praise Ted Thompson? Or will you change your tune like packnut and then rip Thompson for not putting us over the top? Just want this clarified.

We won't go 10-6 Harvey so what's your point?

Ted Thompson will have to demonstrate that he even has a clue how to be a competent GM before he gets any grace fr. some Packer fans that clearly see him as he is.

Some of us have the guts to call Ted Thompson out (via this forum), for his stuck in the mud approach or inflexibility to go for upgrades (Re: the 'O') on the present roster.

The price we have to pay for our integrity to face this man's slowness is worth that integrity.

GO PACKERS !

[Lurker64]

Anybody who speaks authoritatively on what our record will or won't be this season honestly isn't worth listening to. We've played 1 game, so the only record we know we won't have this year is 0-16. 1-15, 2-14, 3-13, 4-12, 5-11, 6-10, 7-9, 8-8, 9-7, 10-6, 11-5, 12-4, 13-3, 14-2, 15-1, an 16-0 are all still distinct possibilities. If you know for a fact what our record will or won't be, please give me stock tips.

Crazy things happen in football, if you say we're not going 10-6, suppose for example that Green Bay wins this weekend (which is certainly not hard to imagine.) Suddenly we've started 2-0, compared to previous years when we've had awful records out of the gate. Considering that last year's team started 1-4 and made it to 8-8 (while losing a few games that were very close and certainly winnable), what on earth would make you think that this year's team couldn't start 2-0 and make it to 10-6?

[Merlin]

Let's say the Pack go 10-6 and make the playoffs this year. Will you edit the sig to praise Ted Thompson? Or will you change your tune like packnut and then rip Thompson for not putting us over the top? Just want this clarified.

We won't go 10-6 Harvey so what's your point?

Ted Thompson will have to demonstrate that he even has a clue how to be a competent GM before he gets any grace fr. some Packer fans that clearly see him as he is.

Some of us have the guts to call Ted Thompson out (via this forum), for his stuck in the mud approach or inflexibility to go for upgrades (Re: the 'O') on the present roster.

The price we have to pay for our integrity to face this man's slowness is worth that integrity.

GO PACKERS !

To quote a koolaid drinker "If you aren't for TT then you aren't a true Packers fan" or some shit like that...

[MJZiggy]

Let's say the Pack go 10-6 and make the playoffs this year. Will you edit the sig to praise Ted Thompson? Or will you change your tune like packnut and then rip Thompson for not putting us over the top? Just want this clarified.

We won't go 10-6 Harvey so what's your point?

Ted Thompson will have to demonstrate that he even has a clue how to be a competent GM before he gets any grace fr. some Packer fans that clearly see him as he is.

Some of us have the guts to call Ted Thompson out (via this forum), for his stuck in the mud approach or inflexibility to go for upgrades (Re: the 'O') on the present roster.

The price we have to pay for our integrity to face this man's slowness is worth that integrity.

GO PACKERS !

The problem with having the guts to call TT out (via this forum) is that he DOESN'T READ THIS FORUM!!!! Maybe try his office--you'll have better luck reaching him there.

[Scott Campbell]

Some of us have the guts to call Ted Thompson out (via this forum).......

Gee, maybe you'll get a Purple Heart, you big, brave man.

[The Shadow]

[quote="woodbuck27"]
Some of us have the guts to call Ted Thompson out (via this forum), for his stuck in the mud approach or inflexibility to go for upgrades (Re: the 'O') on the present roster.
The price we have to pay for our integrity to face this man's slowness is worth that integrity /quote]


Jeezus! You make Nathan Hale seem tentative, meek, and inconfident.
Come down off the barricades. It's FOOTBALL, not a threat to civilization.