Who do you all think decided on the ZBS. Did TT tell M3 that was what he wanted the offense to run or did M3 convince TT this was the way to go? Or was it that TT left it up to M3 and Jags convinced M3 the ZBS was the way to go??? I know Jags learned it in Atlanta but I don't know M3's history so I don't know if he was exposed to it somewhere along the line or not? I'm just curious why the big switch away from a more power running game that I would think would be better suited to Green Bay once the cold and snow hits...but then again maybe not...I'm not a football guru.
Also, why do you think TT has ignored the need at receiver, TE and running back? I guess if you look at Denver you might conclude that any old back can work in the ZBS but that doesn't explain his lack of effort in filling the TE or wide-receiver positions with quality people and now we are looking at heading into the Giant weekend with possibly 3 wideouts, 1 tight-end and three healthy running backs...two rookies and Grant who has been with the Pack for about a week now???
I'm not a TT apologist or a TT basher, but he will have to answer for these problem areas if the offensive woes continue. You wonder if Harlan would pull the plug or leave it up to his successor???
Also, why do you think TT has ignored the need at receiver, TE and running back? I guess if you look at Denver you might conclude that any old back can work in the ZBS but that doesn't explain his lack of effort in filling the TE or wide-receiver positions with quality people and now we are looking at heading into the Giant weekend with possibly 3 wideouts, 1 tight-end and three healthy running backs...two rookies and Grant who has been with the Pack for about a week now???
I'm not a TT apologist or a TT basher, but he will have to answer for these problem areas if the offensive woes continue. You wonder if Harlan would pull the plug or leave it up to his successor???



Comment