Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers running game

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #1

    Packers running game

    After watching 3 games now, I'd like to point out the obvious. WE CAN'T RUN THE FOOTBALL!
    Yesterday on 3rd and 1 we pased the ball. We need to be able to run the ball on 3rd down. Our defense can't stay fresh and play well when our offense is passing this often. If McCarthy can fix this the sky is the limit for the Pack this year.
    To much of a good thing is an awesome thing
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Yesterday, it wasn't so much that we couldn't as it was that we didn't even try it. You'll see the same thing this week. We had 9 rushes for 40 yards before Jackson's goalline attempts at the end.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

    Comment

    • #3
      The threat of Favre's arm is going to open up the run game more in the weeks ahead. Teams can't keep 8 guys in the box anymore and hope to win with a revitalized Favre and Jennings back in the lineup.

      I think the return of Morency will also help.
      My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by The Leaper
        The threat of Favre's arm is going to open up the run game more in the weeks ahead. Teams can't keep 8 guys in the box anymore and hope to win with a revitalized Favre and Jennings back in the lineup.

        I think the return of Morency will also help.
        As will the O-line coming together as a unit and being assignment sure (or zone sure).
        "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

        Comment

        • #5
          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
          Yesterday, it wasn't so much that we couldn't as it was that we didn't even try it. You'll see the same thing this week. We had 9 rushes for 40 yards before Jackson's goalline attempts at the end.
          YES...Totally!!!

          I'd be more concerned if the Pack attempted to run 20 - 25 times and only got 40 yards. Sure, I'd love to see the Packers have a 100+ rushing game. But they were playing a team that is known for being great against the run. The PAtriots exploited the Chargers weakness, if they have one, and that is the secondary. I had hoped McCarthy would do the same and he did.

          But in all honesty, when the Pack did run the ball yesterday, they ran ok.

          Comment

          • #6
            IMO the fact that we are not even trying is quite telling.

            Same game plan IMO next week. Pass Pass Pass and run one out of every 4 or five plays. And win.

            As long as it's the W at the end who cares at this point.
            TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

            Comment

            • #7
              The name of this thread is an oxymoron.
              "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

              KYPack

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by Fritz
                The name of this thread is an oxymoron.
                you're an oxymoron
                To much of a good thing is an awesome thing

                Comment

                • #9
                  Wins are great but I don't think our defense should be on the field this much due to our lack of running the ball and clock management. We almost lost that game and the Eagles game.
                  To much of a good thing is an awesome thing

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    The Packers have been doing a good job of controlling the clock with the short passing game. San Diego only ran 6 more plays than the Packers yesterday. The time of possession was SD 32, GB 28. With the depth the Packers have on the DL, that discrepancy is not a big problem.
                    I can't run no more
                    With that lawless crowd
                    While the killers in high places
                    Say their prayers out loud
                    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                    A thundercloud
                    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      We actually have a time of possession advantage after 3 games.
                      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                        We had 9 rushes for 40 yards before Jackson's goalline attempts at the end.
                        9 rushes for 40 yards is pretty good actually, I'm not sure there are many teams that would be unhappy if after their first 9 rushing plays they had gained 40 yards.

                        I actually saw progress in the running game in the first half yesterday when we were still running the ball. The Packers were able to gash some of those inside runs for the kind of positive yardage that good teams do.

                        Realistically, we didn't run the ball yesterday because the game plan was not to. Last week, the Patriots (who killed the Chargers) ran 5 times in the first quarter for 15 yards, and 6 times in the second quarter for 26 yards (18 of which came during the 2 minute drill when the Chargers were not playing a run oriented defense, so after 9 carries the Patriots had only 23 yards rushing.) In the second half, holding a 24-0 lead the Patriots ran the ball more in order to just kill clock. The Patriots did not beat the Chargers by running the ball, instead they won by defense and passing, and the Packers were never in position to kill the clock by running with a lead until the very end of the game.

                        So why should anybody be concerned about the running game yesterday? The Patriots demonstrated last year against Minnesota that the trick to beating teams with fierce rushing defenses is to just not run the ball, line up and pass on every down, and you know what? It works.
                        </delurk>

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          We have to get the time of possesion #'s up if we are going to continue to be successful.

                          Patriots are good. Here's what they've done.
                          week 1 @ Jets 33-27 advantage Pats
                          week 2 vs. Chargers 35-25 advantage Pats
                          week 3 vs. Bills 34-26 advantage Pats

                          clearly the Pats dominate the clock with their offense, which allows thier defense to be fresh. this is what we need to continue winning. We could easily be 1-2 instead of 3-0.
                          To much of a good thing is an awesome thing

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            If they were 0-3 and weren't movin the ball well, I would be worried..I have to believe the running game will eventually get going..Right now the passing game is working just fine.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Packface
                              Patriots are good. Here's what they've done.
                              week 1 @ Jets 33-27 advantage Pats
                              week 2 vs. Chargers 35-25 advantage Pats
                              week 3 vs. Bills 34-26 advantage Pats
                              The Patriots have also been ahead by 14 points early in every game. That makes controlling time of possession far easier.

                              We don't have the talent across the board that NE has, so why make the comparison? The bottom line is that we are 3-0, regardless of time of possession or any other relevant or ridiculous measurement you can dig up.
                              My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                              Working...
                              X