I wonder how the "Most Improved Clicks" category is determined.
Is it:
(1) largest increase in total clicks, as a raw number, or
(2) largest percentage increase in clicks, or perhaps
(3) largest improvement in rank?
It can't be #1, because otherwise the Packers should obviously win that by a ton. It can't be #3, because the Colts are ranked #5 in most improved clicks, yet they're in 2nd place---same place as last year. But if it's #2, then the Packers should be ranked ahead of the Colts, since the Colts have increased their total over last year by about 25% or so, while the Packers have increased over last year by about 250%.
Edit: I looked at the numbers more closely. They are using method #1, but are throwing out the Packers from consideration. By all rights, we should have a sweep!
They should edit the rule to read: "Most Improved Clicks! We're donating 2007 cans of Campbell's Chunky Soup on behalf of the team other than the Green Bay Packers that improves the most."
Is it:
(1) largest increase in total clicks, as a raw number, or
(2) largest percentage increase in clicks, or perhaps
(3) largest improvement in rank?
It can't be #1, because otherwise the Packers should obviously win that by a ton. It can't be #3, because the Colts are ranked #5 in most improved clicks, yet they're in 2nd place---same place as last year. But if it's #2, then the Packers should be ranked ahead of the Colts, since the Colts have increased their total over last year by about 25% or so, while the Packers have increased over last year by about 250%.
Edit: I looked at the numbers more closely. They are using method #1, but are throwing out the Packers from consideration. By all rights, we should have a sweep!
They should edit the rule to read: "Most Improved Clicks! We're donating 2007 cans of Campbell's Chunky Soup on behalf of the team other than the Green Bay Packers that improves the most."




Comment