If Favre keeps playing like he is, I hope he stays around for a few more years. However, you have to feel for ARod a bit. It has to be tough sitting on the bench for 3 or more years. I'm glad his attitude is still good.
Two questions:
1) Favre's decision making this year has been rock solid. I continually hear McCarthy's phrase about not throwing "late over the middle" and it seems like Favre has cut down on that a lot. How much credit do you give McCarthy for Favre's game management?
2) McCarthy made the comment, when talking about Tavaris Jackson, that it is ideal for a QB to play in his 3rd year. This is Rodgers 3rd year and he looked "ready" in the pre-season. Assuming a likely scenario of the Packers making the playoffs but not winning the Super Bowl, I have to think that Favre comes back in 2008. Do you think that the most likely option, then, is that Rodgers gets traded and we draft a QB from a stable of pretty good options (Brennen, Brohm, Woodson, Booty, etc)? He's gotta be "chomping at the bit" and from what I understand, he's missing out on a lot of $ due to lack of playing time.
MIKE VANDERMAUSE: McCarthy tries to downplay his role in Favre’s decision-making and great start, but I am convinced the coach has a little something to do with Favre’s performance this season. For starters, he stresses not making mistakes. In addition, he displays a lot of confidence in Favre and has let him call or change more plays at the line of scrimmage than ever before. I think McCarthy and Favre have an excellent working relationship.
As for Aaron Rodgers’ future, I still believe it will be in Green Bay. I think Favre will stick around through 2008 and ride the current Packers’ resurgence to a potential deep playoff run. Rodgers told the Press-Gazette’s Rob Demovsky a couple weeks ago he wouldn’t ask for a trade, even if Favre stays beyond this season.
1) Favre's decision making this year has been rock solid. I continually hear McCarthy's phrase about not throwing "late over the middle" and it seems like Favre has cut down on that a lot. How much credit do you give McCarthy for Favre's game management?
2) McCarthy made the comment, when talking about Tavaris Jackson, that it is ideal for a QB to play in his 3rd year. This is Rodgers 3rd year and he looked "ready" in the pre-season. Assuming a likely scenario of the Packers making the playoffs but not winning the Super Bowl, I have to think that Favre comes back in 2008. Do you think that the most likely option, then, is that Rodgers gets traded and we draft a QB from a stable of pretty good options (Brennen, Brohm, Woodson, Booty, etc)? He's gotta be "chomping at the bit" and from what I understand, he's missing out on a lot of $ due to lack of playing time.
MIKE VANDERMAUSE: McCarthy tries to downplay his role in Favre’s decision-making and great start, but I am convinced the coach has a little something to do with Favre’s performance this season. For starters, he stresses not making mistakes. In addition, he displays a lot of confidence in Favre and has let him call or change more plays at the line of scrimmage than ever before. I think McCarthy and Favre have an excellent working relationship.
As for Aaron Rodgers’ future, I still believe it will be in Green Bay. I think Favre will stick around through 2008 and ride the current Packers’ resurgence to a potential deep playoff run. Rodgers told the Press-Gazette’s Rob Demovsky a couple weeks ago he wouldn’t ask for a trade, even if Favre stays beyond this season.




Comment